| infinity | sarnold: Waiting for this test build to finish, but looks like it's a 1-line patch for you, and you can just include that in your security release. | 00:01 |
|---|---|---|
| sarnold | infinity: yay \o/ :) thanks | 00:03 |
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| infinity | sarnold: http://paste.ubuntu.com/6298101/ <-- Test-built, seems to DTRT. | 00:22 |
| === salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
| sarnold | infinity: thanks! | 00:24 |
| === Tm_Tr is now known as Guest48664 | ||
| === freeflying is now known as freeflying_away | ||
| ScottK | xnox: Feel free to ask me if I'm willing to look at a bug, but assignment rights require a contract. | 02:22 |
| ScottK | stgraber: Would you please have a look at the upstartification proposed in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quassel/+bug/1244036 ? | 02:22 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 1244036 in quassel (Ubuntu) "Quasselcore should use an Upstart script instead of a sysv initscript" [Undecided,New] | 02:22 |
| stgraber | ScottK: looks to me like he wants "start on filesystem and static-network-up" instead, but the start on condition he's using isn' wrong either. Just because I'm picky, the respawn stanza is usually put before the script section so it's easier to spot. | 02:27 |
| stgraber | besides that, it should all work fine assuming quasselcore doesn't fork/daemonize | 02:28 |
| stgraber | oh and hardcoding /usr/bin is usually not considered a good thing | 02:28 |
| ScottK | So just excec quasselcore? | 02:29 |
| ScottK | exec even | 02:29 |
| ScottK | stgraber: ^^^ | 02:29 |
| stgraber | yep | 02:30 |
| ScottK | Thanks. | 02:30 |
| === freeflying_away is now known as freeflying | ||
| Mirv | slangasek: yes phablet-test-run works through adb | 03:55 |
| pitti | rbasak: thanks (this early> rolling release!! *cough*) | 04:04 |
| pitti | Good morning | 04:04 |
| Mirv | robru: xnox: I didn't really push on getting the qtmultimedia in. as I was asked I provided some information and prepared the branch from my side, assuming someone working on the bug is doing the pushes. otherwise I'd have pinged a friendly core-dev about the branch or made the lp:ubuntu/* MP. doing that MP now as robru requested. | 04:05 |
| robru | Mirv, yes, sorry. I don't have upload rights so I can't sponsor it or anything. but I really need that in ASAP please. | 04:05 |
| robru | for trusty | 04:06 |
| Mirv | yep the MP seems the best way to go, and I can ping also didrocks who can sponsor from the packaging branch directly | 04:06 |
| robru | ok, great, thanks Mirv | 04:06 |
| pitti | rbasak: so, we are producing cloud images, just no /current symlink | 04:06 |
| Mirv | np | 04:06 |
| pitti | rbasak: but "prepare-testbed -b 20131024.3 amd64" FTW :) | 04:07 |
| === freeflying is now known as freeflying_away | ||
| mati75 | hello | 06:11 |
| mati75 | I have question about upload patched packages to ubuntu repository | 06:11 |
| === Guest48664 is now known as Tm_Tr | ||
| pitti | mati75: (just ask your question) | 07:20 |
| ricotz | doko__, hi, graphviz 2.34.0-0ubuntu4 missed to handle the soname bump "libgvc5: /usr/lib/libgvc.so.6" | 07:20 |
| ricotz | pitti, hi | 07:21 |
| pitti | hey ricotz | 07:21 |
| ricotz | i am curious aren't there checks for the proposed pocket to catch something like that ^ | 07:22 |
| slangasek | normally, it's expected that such changes cause the package to fail to build entirely. | 07:23 |
| ricotz | if there is no symbols file it wont fail | 07:24 |
| slangasek | not true; if the library package is done sanely, it will fail to build when it tries to install files that aren't there | 07:24 |
| ricotz | slangasek, right, but normally the soname isnt mentioned in the install file afaik | 07:25 |
| ricotz | but yeah, that of course would catch it | 07:25 |
| slangasek | if you have neither a symbols file nor a version-checking glob in your install rule, your library packaging is not sane | 07:26 |
| ricotz | alright ;) | 07:26 |
| mati75 | my debian package was copied to ubuntu trusty, but to fine working in ubuntu needs patch | 07:31 |
| mati75 | now I add to ppa: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/154951693/spacefm_0.9.0-1ubuntu1_source.changes | 07:33 |
| pitti | mati75: ah, thanks! happy to sponsor, do you have the link to the PPA? | 07:34 |
| mati75 | https://launchpad.net/~mati75/+archive/spacefm/+packages | 07:36 |
| pitti | mati75: oh, what doesn't work with the global menu? (woudl be nice to report this as a bug to the unity guys so that it can be fixed) | 07:37 |
| mati75 | pitti: yes, here is upsteam bug report: https://github.com/IgnorantGuru/spacefm/issues/49 | 07:40 |
| mati75 | pitti: ok, I try report to unity guys | 07:40 |
| pitti | mati75: ah; probably not an upstream bug, but one in the unity menu; I'll add that link to the changelog, ok? | 07:41 |
| pitti | mati75: uploaded with that | 07:43 |
| === iahmad is now known as iahmad|afk | ||
| === freeflying_away is now known as freeflying | ||
| mati75 | pitti: ok | 08:24 |
| borg_ | Hi, i still have this problem with python-qwt5-qt4: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pyqwt5/+bug/1243102 | 08:59 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 1243102 in pyqwt5 (Ubuntu Trusty) "python-qwt5-qt4 segfaults immediately in saucy" [Undecided,New] | 08:59 |
| borg_ | it was assigned to Scott Kittermann but he unasigned it | 09:00 |
| borg_ | how do i get this package rebuild and reuploaded? | 09:00 |
| borg_ | the source of the package is ok, but the build package is broken (no idea what happend during the build process) | 09:00 |
| === Zic is now known as Guest55478 | ||
| === doko__ is now known as doko | ||
| doko | apw, aarch64 ping | 09:29 |
| doko | chrisccoulson, hi, could you have a look at a libticaples merge this cycle? | 09:40 |
| doko | ricotz, feel free to fix. the graphviz packaging is "interesting" .... | 09:57 |
| xnox | =) | 10:06 |
| pitti | I guess it's too late to hold back graphviz in -proposed for that.. | 10:18 |
| cjwatson | given it's migrated, yes | 10:19 |
| brainwash | can a package maintainer or dev take a look at bug 1183580 please? the actual package maintainer appears to be inactive or just ignores this issue | 10:34 |
| ubottu | bug 1183580 in librcc (Ubuntu) "librcc segfaults on latest saucy" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1183580 | 10:34 |
| === Guest55478 is now known as Zic | ||
| === Sweetsha1k is now known as Sweetshark | ||
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| === MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch | ||
| === MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow | ||
| === freeflying is now known as freeflying_away | ||
| === freeflying_away is now known as freeflying | ||
| darkxst | cjwatson, I hear from upstream, that jenkins in running the glib installed tests, can we get the same for gjs? | 14:16 |
| cjwatson | darkxst: that's up to the gjs packaging I expect | 14:17 |
| Laney | It does that because I packaged the tests and made an autopkgtest for them | 14:17 |
| Laney | so do that | 14:17 |
| darkxst | Laney, ok will do, but how do I make an autopkgtest? | 14:18 |
| cjwatson | http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=autopkgtest/autopkgtest.git;a=blob_plain;f=doc/README.package-tests;hb=HEAD | 14:18 |
| Laney | You can probably copy debian/tests/* from glib2.0 | 14:19 |
| cjwatson | (linked from http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep8/) | 14:19 |
| darkxst | Laney, cjwatson ok cool, I will work it out ;) | 14:22 |
| Laney | darkxst: I think there's a bug that gnome-desktop-testing-runner always returns exit code 0 though | 14:26 |
| Laney | so the tests actually always pass *cough* | 14:27 |
| Laney | for example https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/Saucy/view/AutoPkgTest/job/saucy-adt-glib-networking/9/ARCH=amd64,label=adt/console should have failed | 14:27 |
| darkxst | Laney, then thats not a test ! | 14:27 |
| Laney | yeah the runner needs fixing | 14:27 |
| darkxst | Laney, ok, and I need sleep! big weekend of MTB'ing ahead | 14:30 |
| Laney | darkxst: maybe fixed in trunk actually, /me checks that | 14:34 |
| Laney | have fun mtbing | 14:34 |
| Laney | no, not fixed | 14:35 |
| darkxst | will do! night! | 14:38 |
| seb128 | ev, is errors.ubuntu.com having issues? it doesn't seem to be replying, not sure if that's my connection | 14:39 |
| seb128 | well it's replying but failing to load reports | 14:39 |
| pitti | seb128: timing out here, too, I don't even see the front page | 15:13 |
| seb128 | pitti, I've pinged #is about it, lamont said he's going to have a look | 15:14 |
| seb128 | pitti, hey, wie gehts? almost w.e for you? | 15:14 |
| lamont | believed to be a known issue | 15:14 |
| pitti | seb128: by and large, yes; just waiting for another ofono-phonesim fix to get published, and then re-re-re-running my messaging-app tests and hoping for the best :) | 15:15 |
| seb128 | pitti, ;-) | 15:15 |
| pitti | slangasek: WDYT about a blueprint how to automatically do TRIMming on SSDs? high time for 14.04 LTS IMHO, and also quite embarrassing to have to explain that to every Ubuntu user around me.. | 15:19 |
| pitti | slangasek: (there are two well-known approaches, just needs some discussion what is the better default) | 15:19 |
| stgraber | pitti: are you doing more than adding discard to any SSD+fs that supports it and doing an ATA wipe every once in a while? | 15:24 |
| === salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
| slangasek | pitti: sounds like a good topic | 15:29 |
| pitti | stgraber: I create a cronjob to call fstrim every week | 15:29 |
| pitti | stgraber: that can be generalized to iterate over mount points and checking if it's an SSD with TRIM capabilities, etc | 15:29 |
| pitti | stgraber: I think that's better than "discard", but that's a subject for discussion I think | 15:30 |
| pitti | stgraber: either way, whether discard or cron, we need to do it | 15:30 |
| pitti | drives get excruciatingly slow (I got 1.5 MB/s!) after half a year or so without out | 15:30 |
| pitti | s/out/it/ | 15:30 |
| stgraber | pitti: agreed. All my systems run on SSD here and have all been running with discard, haven't seen any obvious side effects and I have some with pretty busy SSDs running for 2-3 years now. But yeah, a vUDS discussion would be a very good thing as what we do by default is clearly wrong ;) | 15:31 |
| pitti | stgraber, slangasek: ack, I'll register a BP Monday | 15:34 |
| stgraber | pitti: thanks, can you subscribe me to it? | 15:35 |
| pitti | stgraber: sure | 15:35 |
| stgraber | awesome, thanks | 15:35 |
| pitti | it's primarily a "pick your pain" decision anyway, slow delete vs. a rather unpredictable I/O load every week (or whatever frequency we decide) | 15:36 |
| cjohnston | lool: did you get my email about the milestones for the trusty cycle? | 15:39 |
| === ryukafalz_ is now known as ryukafalz | ||
| lamont | seb128, pitti: shoujld be back | 15:56 |
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| === lfaraone_ is now known as lfaraone | ||
| === Nisstyre-laptop is now known as nisstyre | ||
| === kentb is now known as kentb-out | ||
| kenvandine | @pilot in | 18:05 |
| === udevbot changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Ubuntu 13.10 released! | Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support or app devel) | build failures -> http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of lucid -> saucy | #ubuntu-app-devel for app development on Ubuntu http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://bit.ly/lv8soi | Patch Pilots: kenvandine | ||
| === racarr is now known as racarr|sick | ||
| roadmr | stgraber: hello, I see the checkbox-0.14.10 package made it into proposed, did the diff turn out to be ok after all? | 18:33 |
| === salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
| === BenC- is now known as BenC | ||
| === BenC is now known as BENC | ||
| === BENC is now known as BenC | ||
| kenvandine | @pilot out | 20:09 |
| === udevbot changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Ubuntu 13.10 released! | Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support or app devel) | build failures -> http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of lucid -> saucy | #ubuntu-app-devel for app development on Ubuntu http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://bit.ly/lv8soi | Patch Pilots: | ||
| Noskcaj | rbasak, PING | 20:53 |
| Noskcaj | rbasak, Do you plan to merge pysvn any time soon? | 20:55 |
| brainwash | pitti: systemd-shim.c, line 118: the dbus signal does not get emitted occasionally after resuming from suspend. what could be the reason? | 20:59 |
| brainwash | pitti: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/saucy/systemd-shim/saucy/view/head:/src/systemd-shim.c#L118 | 20:59 |
| rbasak | Noskcaj: not right now; do you want to take it? | 21:15 |
| Noskcaj | rbasak, Sure | 21:16 |
| rbasak | Noskcaj: thanks! | 21:18 |
| infinity | Looks like at least one of the patches can probably be dropped. | 21:19 |
| bdmurray | slangasek: how does trusty get added to extras.ubuntu.com? bug 1244050 | 21:20 |
| ubottu | bug 1244050 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "upgrade to trusty fails because of failure to fetch from extras.ubuntu.com" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1244050 | 21:20 |
| infinity | Possibly both. | 21:20 |
| infinity | Noskcaj / rbasak: Looks like both our patches made it upstream, I'll just sync pysvn. | 21:24 |
| Noskcaj | infinity, ok | 21:24 |
| rbasak | infinity: thanks! | 21:25 |
| Noskcaj | It's a bit worrying that the actual maintainer of pysvn hasn't done much in the last 2 years | 21:26 |
| slangasek | stgraber: extras.ubuntu.com> ^^ ? | 21:27 |
| slangasek | bdmurray: I guess it's in some way an ARB function, but I'm not sure if the ARB is still a going concern | 21:27 |
| stgraber | slangasek: can't do anything about it, no longer on the TB | 21:28 |
| slangasek | stgraber: so it's a TB-controlled thing? | 21:28 |
| infinity | What TB? | 21:28 |
| Laney | Isn't it a mirrored PPA? | 21:28 |
| stgraber | slangasek: you need someone on the TB or on the ARB to copy a package between an existing series and trusty in the PPA, wait for it to publish, then remove it | 21:28 |
| stgraber | that way trusty is created on ppa.launchpad.net | 21:28 |
| stgraber | and a bit later, that gets mirrored over to extras.u.c | 21:29 |
| infinity | Which PPA is this? | 21:29 |
| slangasek | and the ARB doesn't exist anymore either? | 21:29 |
| slangasek | bdmurray: so... I guess you can assign it to the technical board :) | 21:29 |
| infinity | I'm sure we can make this happen without a TB. | 21:29 |
| infinity | stgraber: Which PPA? | 21:29 |
| stgraber | infinity: https://launchpad.net/~app-review-board/+archive/ppa | 21:29 |
| Laney | the ARB has members | 21:30 |
| infinity | Nothing published there for saucy, either. Shiny. Though I assume the copy/delete trick happened. | 21:30 |
| stgraber | yep, I did it back in saucy | 21:30 |
| stgraber | http://ppa.launchpad.net/app-review-board/ppa/ubuntu/dists/ | 21:30 |
| stgraber | I believe the latest extras.u.c upload was in quantal | 21:31 |
| infinity | Curious that no one's tried to get it to publish for all arches. | 21:31 |
| infinity | Anyhow, if you can't find an ARB person to do it, we can get a duckie to. | 21:32 |
| bdmurray | okay thanks | 21:33 |
| stgraber | highvoltage, ajmitch: around? | 21:33 |
| infinity | ajmitch: You arou... What he said? | 21:33 |
| stgraber | if we had governance bodies who could make that decision, it'd be nice to get rid of extras.u.c with 14.04 since this clearly isn't used | 21:37 |
| slangasek | stgraber, bdmurray: if extras.u.c should go away for 14.04 anyway, then that means we should really quirk it in u-r-u | 21:48 |
| CajunTechie | Hey guys, off-topic I know but how do I get in touch with the folks at developer.ubuntu.com? | 21:49 |
| stgraber | slangasek: it'd have to be discussed with the CC and TB, but since nothing was published in the past two cycles, it'd seem reasonable to consider this a failure and move on | 21:49 |
| stgraber | in which case we'll indeed need some code to get it out of any system that used to have it enabled | 21:50 |
| sarnold | CajunTechie: this is probably a reasonable starting point: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-website-content | 21:52 |
| CajunTechie | Sarnold: Nope. Not a mention of it on that site. Can nobody submit apps through developer.ubuntu.com right now? | 21:55 |
| sarnold | CajunTechie: let's take a quick step back :) what are you trying to accomplish? :) | 21:56 |
| CajunTechie | Sarnold: I'm trying to submit a new application. It worked last night for the original submission. Then I needed to update and it gives me a 400 error | 22:00 |
| sarnold | CajunTechie: aha! thanks :) try #ubuntu-app-devel ? | 22:07 |
| CajunTechie | Thanks! Didn't know about that one. You're a life-saver Sarnold :-) | 22:10 |
| sarnold | CajunTechie: happy to help, I hope you can get the problem sorted out quickly! :) | 22:10 |
| Noskcaj | mdeslaur, Can you look at https://code.launchpad.net/~noskcaj/ubuntu/trusty/libxrandr/libxrandr ? It builds, but the lintian warning about changes to the diff makes me unsure i did this right | 22:11 |
| mdeslaur | Noskcaj: sure, when I get a minute | 22:14 |
| ev | bdmurray: thanks for landing the t-series update to the retracer config | 22:22 |
| bdmurray | ev: no problem, I also added T to errors | 22:24 |
| bdmurray | ev: I haven't submitted an RT for the update though | 22:24 |
| ev | bdmurray: we're literally working on the stagingstack retracers deployment now, so it won't be too long until we have proper cloudy retracers set up | 22:27 |
| slangasek | chiluk: hi, I've just assigned bug #1242746 to you... it appears there's a regression reported in the procps SRU | 22:35 |
| ubottu | bug 1242746 in procps (Ubuntu) "SIGSEGV when file2str reads zero bytes" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1242746 | 22:35 |
| mdeslaur | Noskcaj: looked good, uploaded, thanks! | 23:12 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!