[00:15] <jose> wgrant: hey, around?
[00:17] <wgrant> jose: Hi
[00:17] <jose> hey, would you mind a PM?
[00:17] <wgrant> Sure
[03:53] <vadi> Hiya. I'm suddenly having difficulty building a package on LP after not having done so for a while. My build, log available at https://launchpadlibrarian.net/155013232/buildlog_ubuntu-saucy-i386.mudlet_1%3A2.1-4ubuntu4_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz, is failing with "gpgv: Can't check signature: public key not found". However, I don't understand why, because I am still signing my build when I do debuild - "Successfully signed dsc and changes files" and d
[04:12] <wgrant> vadi: That's not an error, just a normal warning.
[04:12] <wgrant> "dpkg-source: info: fuzz is not allowed when applying patches
[04:12] <wgrant> dpkg-source: info: if patch 'project_file' is correctly applied by quilt, use 'quilt refresh' to update it"
[04:12] <wgrant> That's the error.
[04:12] <wgrant> dpkg-source: error: LC_ALL=C patch -t -F 0 -N -p1 -u -V never -g0 -E -b -B .pc/project_file/ --reject-file=- < mudlet-2.1/debian/patches/project_file gave error exit status 1
[04:13] <vadi> Ah. Okay, makes sense. I'll follow its prompting then.
[04:21] <vadi> If I do this fix, I would not adversely affect building my packages for earlier versions of Ubuntu, would I? Since removing fuzz would just be increasing the accuracy of the patch.
[05:47] <cjwatson> vadi: Not if you're building the same source package (or very nearly) for earlier versions.
[05:48] <vadi> Thank you
[05:48] <cjwatson> vadi: The relevant target for the accuracy of the patch is the upstream tarball you're using.
[05:50] <vadi> It's my own software in this case. Yeah.
[14:54] <bjsnider> something's not right
[14:55] <bjsnider> i can't update my ppa's description
[14:55] <bjsnider> got build failures with no log
[16:52] <ankrj> Hello, an anyone tell me how I can apply for the Ubuntu Server membership on Launchpad?