[08:31] <tjaalton> synced libwacom and updated the driver
[08:33] <tjaalton> someone should push xorg-server git
[08:33] <mlankhorst> isn't it?
[08:34] <tjaalton> -3u3 is not there, -3u4 was just a changelog entry
[08:35] <tjaalton> ah it's you :)
[08:35] <mlankhorst> oh indeed
[12:58] <tjaalton> mlankhorst: lts-pkg-rename seems to move the tarball and not copy it, that's wrong
[12:58] <tjaalton> copying would be better
[12:59] <mlankhorst> tjaalton: no
[12:59] <tjaalton> uscan downloads the original tarball with the upstream name, and links to it. so the link is moved, but uscan won't work again since the upstream tarball is there
[12:59] <mlankhorst> it's meant to be run from lts-stack, where you have the unrenamed package in $PWD/Stack
[13:00] <tjaalton> i don't follow
[13:00] <tjaalton> can't just run it on the git tree and run reset afterwards?
[13:00] <tjaalton> for sru's 
[13:00] <mlankhorst> well lts-stack copies $PWD/Stack to $PWD/Stack-lts and then operates on it
[13:00] <mlankhorst> well I guess you could, I just don't in general
[13:13] <tjaalton> grr hate bzr
[13:14] <tjaalton> so I want to see the diff from a revision?
[13:17] <tjaalton> oh bzr diff -rNNN
[13:17] <tjaalton> was missing -r
[17:43] <bryce> in ~/.bazaar/bazaar.conf, add under [ALIASES]   show = log -p -c
[17:54] <tjaalton> hmm sounds familiar :)
[17:54] <tjaalton> ok, added this time
[20:37] <darthduck> Hello all
[20:39] <darthduck> I'm looking to attempt to backport some xinput fixes from upstream into the xserver-xorg-core package for precise, while avoiding an ABI change
[20:39] <darthduck> (so that it will still run OK with "legacy" AMD binary drivers)
[20:41] <darthduck> I've reproduced LP 1015183 in precise, and my company would like me to fix it.  :)
[20:42] <darthduck> I've got some questions about the build process with git, vs quilt.
[20:44] <darthduck> The series file calls out patches 505, 506, and 507.  I believe I need to remove those patches before applying the newer upstream source, from whot's touch-grab-race-condition-56578-v3 branch.
[20:45] <darthduck> But I'm not sure if that's truly necessary with the git workflow.  
[20:48] <darthduck> The other question I have (and feel free to point me to a doc) is what's the BKM for the whitespace changes?
[20:49] <darthduck> In other words, would it be acceptable to run x-indent.sh on files I intend to modify, before I modify them, so upstream patches apply more cleanly?
[20:50] <darthduck> Or is that not surgical enough?
[21:00] <darthduck> To contact me off-line, you can email me: camaro nut at gmail dot com (no spaces)
[21:24] <tjaalton> darthduck: can't you just use a backport stack from quantal or raring?
[23:06] <darthduck> ricotz: nope.  I'd love to.  But the ABI changed.  fglrx for legacy boards (4000 series and older) won't work with anything past the precise X server.
[23:07] <darthduck> er... sorry, s/ricotz/tjaalton/
[23:11] <RAOF> darthduck: If you want to get the packages SRUd (ie: into precise-updates), then running x-indent.sh on files is not really going to fly :(
[23:20] <darthduck> RAOF: OK, understood.
[23:20] <darthduck> Ideally I'd like to eventually get them into precise-updates, as long as I'm taking the effort to make it work, might as well make it available to anyone else in the same situation.