[08:31] synced libwacom and updated the driver [08:33] someone should push xorg-server git [08:33] isn't it? [08:34] -3u3 is not there, -3u4 was just a changelog entry [08:35] ah it's you :) [08:35] oh indeed [12:58] mlankhorst: lts-pkg-rename seems to move the tarball and not copy it, that's wrong [12:58] copying would be better [12:59] tjaalton: no [12:59] uscan downloads the original tarball with the upstream name, and links to it. so the link is moved, but uscan won't work again since the upstream tarball is there [12:59] it's meant to be run from lts-stack, where you have the unrenamed package in $PWD/Stack [13:00] i don't follow [13:00] can't just run it on the git tree and run reset afterwards? [13:00] for sru's [13:00] well lts-stack copies $PWD/Stack to $PWD/Stack-lts and then operates on it [13:00] well I guess you could, I just don't in general [13:13] grr hate bzr [13:14] so I want to see the diff from a revision? [13:17] oh bzr diff -rNNN [13:17] was missing -r [17:43] in ~/.bazaar/bazaar.conf, add under [ALIASES] show = log -p -c [17:54] hmm sounds familiar :) [17:54] ok, added this time === JanC_ is now known as JanC === jono is now known as Guest23572 [20:37] Hello all [20:39] I'm looking to attempt to backport some xinput fixes from upstream into the xserver-xorg-core package for precise, while avoiding an ABI change [20:39] (so that it will still run OK with "legacy" AMD binary drivers) [20:41] I've reproduced LP 1015183 in precise, and my company would like me to fix it. :) [20:41] Launchpad bug 1015183 in HWE Next "Inconsistent mouse events for Acer T231H multitouch monitor" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1015183 [20:42] I've got some questions about the build process with git, vs quilt. [20:44] The series file calls out patches 505, 506, and 507. I believe I need to remove those patches before applying the newer upstream source, from whot's touch-grab-race-condition-56578-v3 branch. [20:45] But I'm not sure if that's truly necessary with the git workflow. [20:48] The other question I have (and feel free to point me to a doc) is what's the BKM for the whitespace changes? [20:49] In other words, would it be acceptable to run x-indent.sh on files I intend to modify, before I modify them, so upstream patches apply more cleanly? [20:50] Or is that not surgical enough? [21:00] To contact me off-line, you can email me: camaro nut at gmail dot com (no spaces) [21:24] darthduck: can't you just use a backport stack from quantal or raring? [23:06] ricotz: nope. I'd love to. But the ABI changed. fglrx for legacy boards (4000 series and older) won't work with anything past the precise X server. [23:07] er... sorry, s/ricotz/tjaalton/ [23:11] darthduck: If you want to get the packages SRUd (ie: into precise-updates), then running x-indent.sh on files is not really going to fly :( [23:20] RAOF: OK, understood. [23:20] Ideally I'd like to eventually get them into precise-updates, as long as I'm taking the effort to make it work, might as well make it available to anyone else in the same situation.