| boodroscotch | Hi, I'm trying to build a package for a PPA, but only the i386 version is building, not the amd64 version. The error seems to be the builder completely skipping two lines in the rules file: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/155681652/buildlog_ubuntu-saucy-amd64.mpv_1.0~git20131102-try2_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 01:45 |
|---|---|---|
| boodroscotch | here is the package in question: https://launchpad.net/~blinxwang/+archive/mpv-builds/+packages | 01:46 |
| boodroscotch | any help would be appreciated | 01:46 |
| StevenK | boodroscotch: Are the two lines in the rules file under the binary-indep target? | 01:47 |
| boodroscotch | yes, here is the rules file in question: http://pastebin.com/YKy9SdHN | 01:53 |
| boodroscotch | StevenK | 01:53 |
| boodroscotch | the amd64 builder skips straight to $(MAKE) -C mpv for some reason | 01:54 |
| cjwatson | boodroscotch: Defining both build and override_dh_auto_build is confusing and unwise. I would recommend moving the contents of your build target into override_dh_auto_build and deleting the build target. | 02:41 |
| cjwatson | boodroscotch: The amd64 builder is not skipping to $(MAKE) -C mpv; it's ignoring your build target altogether and executing $(MAKE) -C mpv install as part of dh_auto_install's default behaviour. This is because it's running build-arch rather than build, since it's defined by way of the catch-all % target. As I say, the least confusing way to resolve this is not to define build at all. | 02:43 |
| cjwatson | boodroscotch: You'd see the exact same behaviour if you built locally with debuild -B. | 02:43 |
| boodroscotch | cjwatson: ah, so like this? http://pastebin.com/Z9ZeXV93 | 02:49 |
| cjwatson | boodroscotch: Yes, that looks more likely to work. I'd drop the dh_testdir (pointless, dh already handles it), but that's a detail. | 02:52 |
| cjwatson | (Boarding shortly, so unlikely to be able to help further for a day or so.) | 02:53 |
| boodroscotch | cjwatson: It works. Thank you so much! Have a safe flight! | 02:53 |
| cjwatson | Good stuff | 02:54 |
| cjwatson | thanks | 02:54 |
| Fudge | wgrant regarding the architectures we copied firefox from mozilla teams security ppa to hold back 24 in the vinux/precise-updates ppa but i copied all the binaries oops. cjwatson helped me get remove-package from bzr ubuntu-tools but there are still 225 binaries left and I am having trouble getting a list or identifying ones I have missed. | 03:53 |
| wgrant | Fudge: http://ppa.launchpad.net/vinux/precise-updates/ubuntu/pool/main/f/firefox/ | 04:01 |
| Fudge | mate thank you.... :D I need to learn more about the http structure of LP apparently | 04:04 |
| === ampelbein_ is now known as Ampelbein | ||
| drstikko | Hi can anyone help me out? I have code uploaded to code,launchpad.net I have my own account. But for me it is unclear what the next steps should be to add this code to a ppa package. | 11:22 |
| kprkpr | Hello, anyone can help me deleting a project? I created by error a proyect and I dont know how to delete it.. | 17:50 |
| tsimpson | kprkpr: your best option is to ask for it be deleted via https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | 17:52 |
| kprkpr | thanks | 17:53 |
| === mattw is now known as Guest32193 | ||
| drstikko | anyone experienced with bzr-builder? | 19:44 |
| drstikko | is it possible to generate a rule file from a makefile? | 19:58 |
| drstikko | I have a successful build with recipe from code to ppa, but package does not contain a binary. Anyone can help me with that? | 23:47 |
| StevenK | drstikko: A recipe builds a source package. That source package will then get built into a binary package. | 23:52 |
| drstikko | StevenK, yes I understand, but a buikd request does both right? | 23:53 |
| StevenK | drstikko: If the recipe build succedded, then a source package build will be started automatically, yes. The recipe page also shows the status of the source package builds. | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!