[08:13] <xnox> infinity: I think I got boost as far as I can. See removal plan at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boost1.53/+bug/1245005 . Can you please go over it & sanity check it?
[08:13] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1245005 in orthanc (Ubuntu) "Please remove boost1.49 & 1.53 from trusty-release" [Medium,Confirmed]
[09:47] <ogra_> cjwatson, ARGH !
[09:47] <ogra_> cdimage@nusakan:~$ mark-current -p ubuntu-touch -s saucy -i daily-preinstalled -a armhf 20131031.1
[09:47] <ogra_> ...
[09:48] <ogra_> IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/www/full/ubuntu-touch/saucy/daily-preinstalled/20131031.1/.marked_good'
[09:48] <ogra_> and in fact ...
[09:48] <ogra_> cdimage@nusakan:~$ ls /srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/www/full/ubuntu-touch/saucy/daily-preinstalled/
[09:48] <ogra_> 20131018  pending
[09:48] <ogra_> oh
[09:48] <ogra_> ignore me !
[09:48] <ogra_> sorry, not enough coffee yet
[15:13] <cjwatson> Laney: ben tested as best I can and merged; RT drafted for once it's in the release pocket.  I think I then just need to migrate the config history across and deal with updating the wrapper scripts once the RT's been processed.
[15:16] <cjwatson> I've checked that it makes the ocaml tracker look a lot more sensible, which I'm fairly sure is due to the dose switch
[15:16] <cjwatson> And we can drop deduplicate-packages as you've already discussed in Debian bug mail
[15:44] <seb128> bdmurray, infinity, slangasek: hey, could you get https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/saucy/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=ido approved?
[15:45] <seb128> bdmurray, infinity, slangasek: some gtk changes made that bug more frequent in saucy and it would be nice to get the fix in
[15:45] <seb128> (having indicator-appmenu and hud approved would be nice as well if somebody feels like reviewing those then)
[16:40] <bdmurray> seb128: there is a new upload for hud?
[16:40] <seb128> bdmurray, new upload?
[16:40] <seb128> bdmurray, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/saucy/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=hud
[16:41] <bdmurray> seb128: well there is one in -proposed already that was flagged as causing some regressions
[16:41] <seb128> bdmurray, hum?
[16:41] <seb128> bdmurray, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hud suggests there is none in proposed (it moved to updates)
[16:41] <seb128> bdmurray, do you have a bug/reference for the regression?
[16:41] <bdmurray> seb128: right, sorry
[16:42] <bdmurray> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/phased-updates.html
[16:44] <seb128> bdmurray, is there any way to see those issues from launchpad? (e.g tags or something)
[16:45] <bdmurray> seb128: what do you mean? these don't exist as bugs in Launchpad since they are reported by users of the stable release and bug filing is turned off by default.  Long term we plan to open bugs in Launchpad for these types of crashes.
[16:46] <seb128> bdmurray, I'm just wondering if I can get email notification in some way for those
[16:47] <bdmurray> seb128: generally the uploader of the package is email regarding the regression which in this case is ps-jenkins@lists.canonical.com
[16:47] <seb128> bdmurray, right, I'm not even sure that goes something, not to the packager that asked for the upload in any case
[16:48] <seb128> something->somewhere
[16:48] <seb128> bdmurray, that's the email of the upload bot
[16:49] <seb128> bdmurray, in any case the hud SRU moved to updates and the current in the queue fix extra things
[16:50] <bdmurray> seb128: do you know if it will fix any of these new crashes?
[16:50] <seb128> bdmurray, I'm not sure, those issues seem buggy
[16:50] <seb128> e.g https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/d190cec8ca35dbef61a89965aa0339d7837910fe
[16:50] <seb128> This problem failed to retrace.
[16:51] <seb128> bdmurray, I wonder if that's typical "the old version which was still loaded hit the old bug, but apport reported the installed package version which was the new version"
[16:51] <bdmurray> that wasn't one inthe report and failed to retrace ones are not considered a regression
[16:52] <seb128> bdmurray, I don't know about the other ones, but I can ping ted about them
[16:52] <bdmurray> seb128: that'd be great
[16:52] <seb128> bdmurray, in any case the SRU was fixing the most common saucy error, the new one has much less frequent on the report ... still would be good to investigate
[16:55] <slangasek> bdmurray: so do you have a handle on this ido package seb128 mentioned, or should I have a look?
[16:56] <bdmurray> slangasek: I'll take a look at that.  I'd like a second opinion on releasing cloud-init (from -proposed) early though.
[17:00] <bdmurray> seb128: with regards to your comment regarding 'typical "old version was still loaded...' comment that should be fixed with bug 1039220
[17:00] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1039220 in apport (Ubuntu Quantal) "don't report crashes for programs that don't match the file on disk (like for kernel crashes)" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1039220
[17:01] <seb128> bdmurray, hum,k, I wonder if we still have cases where it happens
[17:13] <xnox> pytango/armhf has finished building 57min ago, yet rmadison -S says it's not in trusty-proposed yet. Should I just wait, or is something wrong?
[17:14] <cjwatson> looking
[17:17] <cjwatson> It looks like we're having a couple of gigantic publisher runs, is all
[17:18] <cjwatson> libav and chromium security updates in succession, each to lots of series
[17:19] <cjwatson> chromium has a number of half-gigabyte debs so it takes a while just for the publisher to fetch them from the librarian never mind anything else
[17:21] <bdmurray> seb128: do you know the errors bucket for the crash for bug 1243654?
[17:21] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1243654 in hud (Ubuntu Saucy) "window-stack-bridge crashed with SIGSEGV in BamfWindow::windowId()" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1243654
[17:22] <bdmurray> I found it never mind
[17:24] <seb128> bdmurray, thanks
[17:44] <cjwatson> xnox: it's there now
[18:01] <cjwatson> FYI: publisher down pending investigation of I/O errors
[18:04] <slangasek> bdmurray: cloud-init> LGTM, it's a targeted fix and has been verified
[18:04] <bdmurray> slangasek: okay, thanks I'll release it
[21:17] <mapreri> Hi! i would like to do an SRU to fix the bug #1242413. I havn't upload rights, but I can find a sponsor easily. Can I make a debdiff and submit a SRU bug with it? (following the wiki page, of course)
[21:17] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1242413 in nautilus-dropbox (Ubuntu) "nautilus-dropbox needs a dependency on libappindicator1" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1242413
[21:27] <xnox> mapreri: yeap, makde a debdiff, attach to the bug report and subscrib "ubuntu-sponsors" to the bug.
[21:29] <mapreri> xnox: great, I think several people need that fix (at least, on the Italian ML there are a lot of people complaining...)
[21:31] <xnox> Can python2.7 be hinted past openvswitch ADT failure? (openvswitch is being worked on to fix it's dkms module)
[23:40] <xnox> cjwatson: i ported ubuntu-keyboard to the new libpinyin, merge proposal upstream is here https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/ubuntu-keyboard/libpinyin4/+merge/193859 but the "C.I." merger builds my merge-proposal without "trusty-proposed" enabled, so can't install new libpinyin. =/
[23:41] <xnox> that should unblock db removal, and pinyin transition into -release.