=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha [07:58] Moin, pls set the bug #1248041 to "Won't fix" [07:58] Launchpad bug 1248041 in thunar-vfs (Ubuntu) "Missing libthunar-vfs-1-dev package in Saucy 13.10" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1248041 === greyback is now known as greyback|lunch [13:02] I am contributing to Ubuntu . After adding a patch to my bug report in launchpad , I saw a comment that only says ," tags: added: patch " . What does it mean ???? [13:05] That just means an automatic process noticed that you had added a patch and tagged .just ignore it [13:12] So does it mean my bug fix is over ? I mean the review part of my bug fix ? [13:28] no === greyback|lunch is now known as greyback [14:37] dhanu: please read https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates?action=show&redirect=SRU [14:37] (I am assuming this is a SRU, BTW) === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha [16:09] Please triage the bug #1247852 [16:09] Launchpad bug 1247852 in Ubuntu One Client "Ubuntu One Pauses and starts every 3 minutes" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1247852 [16:27] j_f-f_: since the package is the upstream one for U1, only the developers can change status. BugControl can only deal with Ubuntu packages [16:28] j_f-f_: er, rephrasing: BugControl cannot change status to Triaged [16:38] hi hggdh, ok [16:48] j_f-f_: and, BTW, thank you for your help :-) [16:49] :-) [17:02] hggdh: is my trekweb.org email address actually 100% approved to send to the bugsquad list? [17:02] i just got a bounce that it isn't [17:02] and it's already subscribed [17:25] can someone of the ubuntu bug control team invalidate this bug for trusty (it was fixed in the very early trusty time with a new upstream release upload) and set in progress/whishlist the saucy targhet? I'm going to update the title/description in order to prepare it to SRU, but I can't nominate the series. [17:25] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus-dropbox/+bug/1242413 [17:25] Launchpad bug 1242413 in nautilus-dropbox (Ubuntu) "nautilus-dropbox needs a dependency on libappindicator1" [Undecided,In progress] [17:52] mapreri: can you point me at the commit that fixes it? [17:52] because you stated that you want it to be "Invalid" against Trusty, if it's already fixed in Trusty I'll Fix Released it [17:52] but nominate it for Saucy because someone higher up than bug control needs to approve the series nomination for Saucy [17:53] (nominated for Saucy though) [17:57] mapreri: also, have you actually gone and *confirmed* that Trusty is not affected? [18:11] mapreri: you should apply the SRU templates though and get it ready for SRU whether it's had a nomination approved for Saucy or not, though... and show evidence that it's actually fixed in Trusty [18:33] TheLordOfTime: checking [18:33] hggdh: thanks. [18:39] TheLordOfTime: and you are not under mod ;-). I wonder what happened [18:42] no idea [18:43] contact the system maintainer then, see if they broke it? [18:44] heh [18:44] can you send another one in? Now I really want to look at the headers (I approved the other one, so it is gone) [18:44] it'll be a test one though, do you mind? [18:44] or do you just want me to resend my response, and claim "Whoops dupe!" [18:45] I do not mind, at all [18:45] anything will do -- after all, it is *your* email sending it, and I can always claim "no recollection" [18:45] :-) [18:46] oops, meeting time. BBI5min [18:46] shoot. Be back in 45 min [18:46] sent one [18:47] i mentioned it was a requested test message, so it can be ignored [18:47] cool [18:47] hggdh: it got throug happarently [18:47] no idea why it didn't earlier [18:47] maybe it had to do with a digital signature issue, Alberto said the sig on my message was invalid... [18:47] yeah, I do not see it in the mod's queue. Cosmic rays [18:47] hehe [18:48] hi I have a question... I've yesterday ask for triage the bug #1241796. Have I that's not done right? [18:48] Launchpad bug 1241796 in modemmanager (Ubuntu) "USB GSM-Modem ID 12d1:1506 doesn't hold the connection" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1241796 [18:48] j_f-f_: hopefully someone else will be able to look into it now, I got a meeting. Will be back in 45 min, though [18:49] hggdh Thanks [19:21] j_f-f_: OK, good you got the ubuntu package this time [19:22] "this time" [19:22] penguin42: has he failed at this before? XD [19:23] TheLordOfTime: It was wired to ModemManager rather than ModemManager(ubuntu) yesterday [19:24] j_f-f_: Still knowing nothing about modern modems, do you know what the relation between ModemManager and pppconfig is - i.e. was the user right to use pppconfig and expect modemManager to do the right thing? But assuming that's right, what severity would you give it? === thomi_ is now known as thomi [19:43] ah [21:01] TheLordOfTime: umh... I decided to check on my own, since before I asked to check to a my fried, if that issue was fixed or not in trusty, and it isn't. So I'm going to upload in that bug a debdiff for trusty and one for saucy. Once somebody upload the trusty one I'm going to submit the SRU request. I have the describtion for the SRU bug ready on my PC. I feel like an idiot... I though it was fixed "somehow" :| Thanks anyway for the support. [23:08] mapreri, okay, cool, I'd get it in Trusty first then. Comment on the bug that Trusty is affected by the bug too. :) [23:09] oop nevermind, saw it just now... [23:10] mapreri, I did mark it as "Confirmed" though for Saucy, so it doesn't just say "new". Just wait for the sponsors now :)