[07:58] <j_f-f_> Moin, pls set the bug #1248041 to "Won't fix"
[07:58] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1248041 in thunar-vfs (Ubuntu) "Missing libthunar-vfs-1-dev package in Saucy 13.10" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1248041
[13:02] <dhanu> I am contributing to Ubuntu . After adding a patch to my bug report  in launchpad , I saw a comment  that only  says ," tags: added: patch " . What does it mean ????
[13:05] <athira> That just means an automatic process noticed that you had added a patch and tagged .just ignore it
[13:12] <dhanu> So does it mean my bug fix is over ? I mean the review part of my bug fix ?
[13:28] <athira> no
[14:37] <hggdh> dhanu: please read https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates?action=show&redirect=SRU
[14:37] <hggdh> (I am assuming this is a SRU, BTW)
[16:09] <j_f-f_> Please triage the bug #1247852
[16:09] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1247852 in Ubuntu One Client "Ubuntu One Pauses and starts every 3 minutes" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1247852
[16:27] <hggdh> j_f-f_: since the package is the upstream one for U1, only the developers can change status. BugControl can only deal with Ubuntu packages
[16:28] <hggdh> j_f-f_: er, rephrasing: BugControl cannot change status to Triaged
[16:38] <j_f-f_> hi hggdh,  ok
[16:48] <hggdh> j_f-f_: and, BTW, thank you for your help :-)
[16:49] <j_f-f_> :-)
[17:02] <TheLordOfTime> hggdh: is my trekweb.org email address actually 100% approved to send to the bugsquad list?
[17:02] <TheLordOfTime> i just got a bounce that it isn't
[17:02] <TheLordOfTime> and it's already subscribed
[17:25] <mapreri> can someone of the ubuntu bug control team invalidate this bug for trusty (it was fixed in the very early trusty time with a new upstream release upload) and set in progress/whishlist the saucy targhet? I'm going to update the title/description in order to prepare it to SRU, but I can't nominate the series.
[17:25] <mapreri> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus-dropbox/+bug/1242413
[17:25] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1242413 in nautilus-dropbox (Ubuntu) "nautilus-dropbox needs a dependency on libappindicator1" [Undecided,In progress]
[17:52] <TheLordOfTime> mapreri: can you point me at the commit that fixes it?
[17:52] <TheLordOfTime> because you stated that you want it to be "Invalid" against Trusty, if it's already fixed in Trusty I'll Fix Released it
[17:52] <TheLordOfTime> but nominate it for Saucy because someone higher up than bug control needs to approve the series nomination for Saucy
[17:53] <TheLordOfTime> (nominated for Saucy though)
[17:57] <TheLordOfTime> mapreri: also, have you actually gone and *confirmed* that Trusty is not affected?
[18:11] <TheLordOfTime> mapreri: you should apply the SRU templates though and get it ready for SRU whether it's had a nomination approved for Saucy or not, though... and show evidence that it's actually fixed in Trusty
[18:33] <hggdh> TheLordOfTime: checking
[18:33] <TheLordOfTime> hggdh: thanks.
[18:39] <hggdh> TheLordOfTime: and you are not under mod ;-). I wonder what happened
[18:42] <TheLordOfTime> no idea
[18:43] <TheLordOfTime> contact the system maintainer then, see if they broke it?
[18:44] <hggdh> heh
[18:44] <hggdh> can you send another one in? Now I really want to look at the headers (I approved the other one, so it is gone)
[18:44] <TheLordOfTime> it'll be a test one though, do you mind?
[18:44] <TheLordOfTime> or do you just want me to resend my response, and claim "Whoops dupe!"
[18:45] <hggdh> I do  not mind, at all
[18:45] <hggdh> anything will do -- after all, it is *your* email sending it, and I can always claim "no recollection"
[18:45] <hggdh> :-)
[18:46] <hggdh> oops, meeting time. BBI5min
[18:46] <hggdh> shoot. Be back in 45 min
[18:46] <TheLordOfTime> sent one
[18:47] <TheLordOfTime> i mentioned it was a requested test message, so it can be ignored
[18:47] <hggdh> cool
[18:47] <TheLordOfTime> hggdh: it got throug happarently
[18:47] <TheLordOfTime> no idea why it didn't earlier
[18:47] <TheLordOfTime> maybe it had to do with a digital signature issue, Alberto said the sig on my message was invalid...
[18:47] <hggdh> yeah, I do not see it in the mod's queue. Cosmic rays
[18:47] <TheLordOfTime> hehe
[18:48] <j_f-f_> hi I have a question... I've yesterday ask for triage the bug #1241796.  Have I that's not done right?
[18:48] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1241796 in modemmanager (Ubuntu) "USB GSM-Modem ID 12d1:1506 doesn't hold the connection" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1241796
[18:48] <hggdh> j_f-f_: hopefully someone else will be able to look into it now, I got a meeting. Will be back in 45 min, though
[18:49] <j_f-f_> hggdh Thanks
[19:21] <penguin42> j_f-f_: OK, good you got the ubuntu package this time
[19:22] <TheLordOfTime> "this time"
[19:22] <TheLordOfTime> penguin42: has he failed at this before?  XD
[19:23] <penguin42> TheLordOfTime: It was wired to ModemManager rather than ModemManager(ubuntu) yesterday
[19:24] <penguin42> j_f-f_: Still knowing nothing about modern modems, do you know what the relation between ModemManager and pppconfig is - i.e. was the user right to use pppconfig and expect modemManager to do the right thing?  But assuming that's right, what severity would you give it?
[19:43] <TheLordOfTime> ah
[21:01] <mapreri> TheLordOfTime: umh... I decided to check on my own, since before I asked to check to a my fried, if that issue was fixed or not in trusty, and it isn't. So I'm going to upload in that bug a debdiff for trusty and one for saucy. Once somebody upload the trusty one I'm going to submit the SRU request. I have the describtion for the SRU bug ready on my PC. I feel like an idiot... I though it was fixed "somehow" :| Thanks anyway for the support.
[23:08] <TheLordOfTime> mapreri, okay, cool, I'd get it in Trusty first then.  Comment on the bug that Trusty is affected by the bug too.  :)
[23:09] <TheLordOfTime> oop nevermind, saw it just now...
[23:10] <TheLordOfTime> mapreri, I did mark it as "Confirmed" though for Saucy, so it doesn't just say "new".  Just wait for the sponsors now :)