| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| Laney | cjwatson: great, nice work | 09:05 |
|---|---|---|
| Laney | I set up a configs branch; did you find that? | 09:08 |
| Laney | https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-transition-trackers/ubuntu-transition-tracker/configs | 09:08 |
| Laney | bitrotted but you get the idea | 09:08 |
| Laney | and I think there was independent work on the level calculation which benefits haskell/ocaml in addition to the dose switch | 09:08 |
| cjwatson | xnox: OK, cool, have you asked #ubuntu-ci-eng to help with the merger issue? | 10:05 |
| cjwatson | Laney: Yep, next step is to port commits over to that branch | 10:06 |
| cjwatson | Laney: And indeed, I'm keen on getting the improved level calculation although the correctness issue with :any is definitely more important | 10:06 |
| Laney | Sure is | 10:11 |
| xnox | cjwatson: merged automake-1.14 is in new =) i poke on #ubuntu-ci-eng about merger. | 10:50 |
| cjwatson | xnox: Yeah, still slogging my way through morning tasks | 10:58 |
| sil2100 | Hi guys! Anyone from the SRU team having some free time for a saucy SRU? We need to get ubuntu-download-manager SRUed, it's in the unapproved saucy queue right now | 13:22 |
| sil2100 | The bug in mention: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-download-manager/+bug/1240656 | 13:22 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1240656 in ubuntu-download-manager (Ubuntu) "disable debug logging by default" [Critical,In progress] | 13:22 |
| cjwatson | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/ <- new tracker in place | 14:33 |
| stgraber | mdeslaur: ping | 14:57 |
| mdeslaur | stgraber: I'm not really here, but what's up? | 14:57 |
| stgraber | mdeslaur: I'm looking at http://launchpadlibrarian.net/155309983/xorg-server-lts-quantal_2%3A1.13.0-0ubuntu6.3~precise1_2%3A1.13.0-0ubuntu6.5~precise1.diff.gz and I'm wondering whether that's really aimed at precise-proposed rather than landing straight in -security | 14:58 |
| stgraber | (that's xorg-server-lts-quantal 2:1.13.0-0ubuntu6.5~precise1 in the queue) | 14:59 |
| mdeslaur | wth...one sec, looking | 15:00 |
| stgraber | so if you can confirm this is indeed intended for -security, I'll get it pushed directly in there so it doesn't have to stay a week in proposed | 15:00 |
| mdeslaur | stgraber: that looks completely wrong | 15:00 |
| mdeslaur | the changelog says "xorg-server" as the package name | 15:01 |
| mdeslaur | not xorg-server-lts-quantal like it's supposed to | 15:01 |
| mdeslaur | stgraber: something exploded there | 15:01 |
| stgraber | yeah, I believe they do some kind of automated mangling, so the changelog stays identical to the source, debian/control gets mangled and the .changes contains the right target | 15:01 |
| mdeslaur | stgraber: I am _completely_ confused what that's all about | 15:03 |
| mdeslaur | stgraber: that _definitely_ shouldn't be in the archive at all I believe | 15:04 |
| mdeslaur | stgraber: as it will overwrite the newer security release | 15:05 |
| stgraber | tjaalton: around? | 15:06 |
| mdeslaur | stgraber: even the one in precise-proposed shouldn't be there | 15:06 |
| mdeslaur | as that one also overrides the last security update | 15:06 |
| stgraber | ok, so it looks like this is a straight copy ot precise of xorg-server 2:1.13.0-0ubuntu6.5 in quantal | 15:08 |
| stgraber | 2:1.13.0-0ubuntu6.5 in quantal hasn't yet been approved into quantal-proposed, it's in the queue, here: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/155309276/xorg-server_2%3A1.13.0-0ubuntu6.1_2%3A1.13.0-0ubuntu6.5.diff.gz | 15:08 |
| mdeslaur | stgraber: ah, ok, that makes more sense then | 15:09 |
| stgraber | so are you saying we have security updates that are in precise in our xorg-server-lts-quantal package that aren't in the xorg-server of quantal in version 2:1.13.0-0ubuntu6.5? | 15:09 |
| mdeslaur | stgraber: the changelog you liked me to originally only had part of the changes listed in it | 15:09 |
| stgraber | yeah, that one was horribly confusing... I ended up doing another debdiff locally to try and understand that mess :) | 15:09 |
| mdeslaur | stgraber: xorg-server (2:1.13.0-0ubuntu6.5) from quantal-proposed can be pushed as xorg-server-lts-quantal 2:1.13.0-0ubuntu6.5~precise1 | 15:10 |
| stgraber | so I guess I'll go and review the quantal upload first, and if that one looks good, accept the precise backport of it into -proposed | 15:10 |
| mdeslaur | stgraber: I'm a bit surprised that we don't need to mangle the package name in the changelog...but if it works, then fine | 15:10 |
| stgraber | right and since 6.5 is bugfix only, that'll go to -proposed. 6.4 was the security upload (which apparently made it to precise as a patch on top of 6.1) | 15:12 |
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| tjaalton | stgraber: yes, I'll check that out.. | 15:13 |
| stgraber | tjaalton: I think it looks good in the end, the diffs were just extremely confusing :) | 15:13 |
| tjaalton | yeah, they always are :/ | 15:13 |
| tjaalton | maybe even more so this time | 15:15 |
| stgraber | tjaalton: so that will overwrite the existing xorg-server-lts-quantal in precise-proposed (2:1.13.0-0ubuntu6.3~precise1), I guess that's fine? | 15:15 |
| stgraber | hmm, 6.3 didn't have a tracking bug apparently and has been superseded by the security update, so I can't release it to precise-updates anyway, so overwriting it's | 15:16 |
| stgraber | tjaalton: and accepted into precise-proposed. Note that because of the way those backports are done, the tracking bugs don't appear on our reports (pending-sru), so you'll need to come ping us once testing is done | 15:17 |
| stgraber | (since we otherwise we won't notice and the package will stay in -proposed forever) | 15:17 |
| stgraber | s/we // | 15:17 |
| tjaalton | right, overwriting the old one is fine | 15:18 |
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| stgraber | cjwatson: ping | 15:22 |
| stgraber | cjwatson: your partman-auto upload to precise-proposed points to bug 1197766 which is missing the usual SRU paperwork | 15:22 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1197766 in partman-auto (Ubuntu Precise) "Different partition layout after recovery with keep home partition" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1197766 | 15:22 |
| cjwatson | stgraber: I'm kind of reliant on Franz verifying it since I don't know how ubuntu-recovery works | 15:24 |
| stgraber | cjwatson: ok, I'll let it through then | 15:28 |
| cjwatson | stgraber: I think the description should be sufficient to reproduce if you have the slightest clue how to set up u-r :-) | 15:30 |
| stgraber | cjwatson: yeah, so long as you have a tester lined up, that's fine :) | 15:31 |
| cjwatson | sil2100: ^- there, I got round to it after all | 15:33 |
| cjwatson | sil2100: (but please see that it gets released to trusty ASAP as well) | 15:33 |
| sil2100 | cjwatson: thank you! :) | 15:37 |
| sil2100 | cjwatson: sure thing, we anyway want to release as much as we can today | 15:37 |
| === mbarnett` is now known as mbarnett | ||
| stgraber | usual release/cdimage/sru/mir vUDS session: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/core-1311-release please subscribe if you can attend | 16:40 |
| === ivanka is now known as ivanka-train | ||
| === thomi_ is now known as thomi | ||
| ogra_ | ogra@chromebook:~/Desktop$ rmadison ubuntu-ui-toolkit | 19:52 |
| ogra_ | curl: (56) Recv failure: Connection reset by peer | 19:52 |
| ogra_ | is that on my side ? | 19:52 |
| ogra_ | ah, no, cant ssh either | 19:53 |
| apw | ogra_, not working for me | 19:53 |
| ogra_ | or ping | 19:53 |
| ogra_ | ah, now ping works again | 19:53 |
| ogra_ | weird | 19:53 |
| ogra_ | apw, well, my fist ssh attempt got me connection refused ... now it just returns me siletly to a prompt | 19:54 |
| ogra_ | ogra@chromebook:~/Desktop$ ssh people.canonical.com | 19:54 |
| ogra_ | ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host | 19:54 |
| apw | ogra_, sounds like it is rebooting to me | 19:58 |
| ogra_ | yeah | 19:58 |
| ogra_ | IS just confirmed | 19:58 |
| ogra_ | what about the 10sec boottime i'm always asked about ... | 19:58 |
| ogra_ | doesnt apply to servers eh ? | 19:59 |
| ogra_ | :P | 19:59 |
| stgraber | we'd need pretty expensive SSDs to get fsck to run on lillypilly in less than 10s :) | 19:59 |
| stgraber | that or we could just kick the security team out of that box ;) | 19:59 |
| ogra_ | hehe | 19:59 |
| jdstrand | hey | 20:04 |
| jdstrand | we don't usually DoS the box | 20:05 |
| kenvandine | jdstrand, *usually* :-p | 20:08 |
| jdstrand | *shrug* | 20:08 |
| jdstrand | what can I say? | 20:08 |
| * ogra_ wonders what else actually got rebooted ... | 20:19 | |
| ogra_ | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/trusty/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/0.1.46+14.04.20131105.1-0ubuntu1 was copied 1h ago ... it should long have showed up in proposed | 20:19 |
| ogra_ | stgraber, ^^ any idea ? | 20:33 |
| stgraber | seems like LP is a bit confused | 20:34 |
| ogra_ | yeah, that much i guessed myself :D | 20:34 |
| stgraber | I'm trying to make the package show up again in -proposed so britney can pick it up from there, let's see what happens | 20:36 |
| ogra_ | k | 20:38 |
| stgraber | last publisher failed because of missing access to the seeds | 20:39 |
| stgraber | yeah, the publisher looks stuck | 20:40 |
| stgraber | infinity, cjwatson: ping | 20:40 |
| stgraber | the publisher has been running for 1h30 now, the reboot of lillypilly seems to have got it stuck somewhere in seed processing | 20:41 |
| * stgraber tries webops | 20:45 | |
| highvoltage | what in the world is webops? | 20:46 |
| stgraber | highvoltage: the team responsible for keeping those services online | 20:47 |
| highvoltage | ah right | 20:47 |
| infinity | stgraber: Hrm? | 20:47 |
| stgraber | infinity: publisher stuck on pepo | 20:48 |
| infinity | How would a reboot of lillypilly relate, though? That was the "hrm". :) | 20:48 |
| stgraber | infinity: my best guess is that pepo accesses the seeds and as people.canonical.com went down, it got confused and stuck somehow | 20:49 |
| stgraber | infinity: that's based on some odd error from the kubuntu seeds in the publisher logs around the time it got stuck | 20:49 |
| infinity | Well, extra-override generation isn't critical to the publisher succeeding, we can just kill it and see if it's happy on the next run. | 20:50 |
| stgraber | infinity: yeah, that was my guess and why I asked webops to kick it (though nobody replied yet). I'm just in ubuntu_archive, not in lp_archive so can't do the kicking myself. | 20:51 |
| infinity | stgraber: Kicked. It threw some lovely OOPSen, should recover on the next run. | 20:51 |
| stgraber | seems much happier now | 20:54 |
| stgraber | ogra_: ubuntu-ui-toolkit is in proposed now | 21:23 |
| ogra_ | stgraber, thanks a lot | 21:29 |
| infinity | xnox: I fixed orthanc for you. Slacker. ;) | 21:56 |
| xnox | infinity: you are so ..... big indian. | 22:04 |
| xnox | infinity: i've said before if I have a nice powerpc box, i'd fix things =) | 22:04 |
| infinity | xnox: If you ask nicely, I have one for you. | 22:05 |
| infinity | (We may get a decent porter again soon anyway, but soon isn't today) | 22:05 |
| xnox | infinity: ok, if need arises I'll ask you =) | 22:06 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!