[00:13] <cmaloney> Bah, sorry to have missed him.
[03:54] <shakes808> Good evening all
[04:02] <shakes808> help
[04:02] <shakes808> .. for got the slash sorry.
[04:03] <cmaloney> Hey shakes808
[04:03] <cmaloney> How goes?
[04:03] <shakes808> Goes well.
[04:04] <shakes808> Can't complain too much haha
[04:04] <shakes808> how about yourself?
[04:04] <cmaloney> Same ol' same ol'.
[04:05] <shakes808> Months end just happened, was it crazy? How are things at the job?
[04:05] <cmaloney> Meh, the usual
[04:05] <cmaloney> I don't get much involved with that. :)
[04:06] <shakes808> That must be nice to not have that extra stress.
[04:06] <shakes808> What is new in the land of CHC?
[04:06] <shakes808> I have been meaning to go to one, but work has been crazy
[04:06] <cmaloney> I try to not volunteer myself for extra stress
[04:06] <shakes808> haha
[04:06] <shakes808> +1
[04:06] <cmaloney> We've been meeting at the Starbucks down Woodward
[04:07] <cmaloney> Caribou closed.
[04:07] <shakes808> Yeah, I saw somehting about that
[04:07] <shakes808> How is the new locale working?
[04:07] <shakes808> Do they have a room?
[04:07] <cmaloney> They're set to open on November 11th
[04:07] <cmaloney> Starbucks? They're smaller and more crowded.
[04:08] <shakes808> Is there a library in that area that has a room? Something like the monthly open source meetings?
[04:09] <shakes808> I know at the Clinton Township library, they have some pretty large rooms. But that would be way out of your way.
[04:10] <waf> i think the Caribou will reopen as Peets next Monday, the 11th
[04:10] <cmaloney> shakes808: We used to rent out the Clinton Macomb rooms when I lived there
[04:10] <waf> so we're really only homeless for this coming wednesday
[04:10] <cmaloney> unfortunately I'm no longer a resident.
[04:10] <waf> (assuming we can meet at Peets)
[04:15] <cmaloney> yeah
[04:16] <shakes808> convienent
[04:16] <cmaloney> Apparently they had a theft there. SOmeone stole their computer.
[14:14] <cmaloney> GOod morning
[14:14] <cmaloney> Oh, and apparently someone stole the 18ft trailer that was there as well (Peet's)
[14:16] <cmaloney> http://royaloak.patch.com/groups/police-and-fire/p/construction-trailer-stolen-at-peets-vandals-strike-cars-and-more
[14:34] <brousch> cmaloney: Welcome to Detroit!
[14:35] <rick_h_> cmaloney: ouch!
[14:36] <cmaloney> brousch: That's just it: Royal Oak isn't Detroit.
[14:36] <cmaloney> We're above this sort of shit.
[14:37] <cmaloney> At this rate I'm wondering if Peet's will even open in this area or just pack up and go home. :)
[14:37] <cmaloney> But there are signs on the building, and they were making some good progress
[14:37] <cmaloney> so that's a plus.
[14:38] <brousch> Royal Oak falls within my definition of Detroit
[14:38] <cmaloney> Time to redefine
[14:39] <brousch> Sounds to me like my definition got some verification :P
[14:40] <cmaloney> Slippery slope, sir. Slippery slope.
[14:40] <cmaloney> Don't make me bust out the Holland Michigan stereotypes. :)
[14:40] <brousch> Everything East of my beloved Ann Arbor, from the thumbpit to the state line
[14:41] <cmaloney> Seriously? Port Huron is Detroit?
[14:41] <brousch> I should probably set a northern limit north of Flint
[14:41] <cmaloney> It's closer to Canada than Detroit.
[14:42] <cmaloney> So how is Lake Michigan this time of year? ;)
[14:42] <cmaloney> Great headline: "Election Day: Polls Open, City Clerk Predicts Turnout"
[14:44] <brousch> Maybe a better definition would be anything 20 miles from the windsor tunnel
[14:45] <cmaloney> brousch: How about we stick to calling Royal Oak a suburb?
[14:52] <brousch> 25 miles from the 94/96 intersection is pretty much exactly what I think of Detroit
[14:52] <jrwren> royal oak is what? 3-4miles from detroit border? of course its detroit related crime, there is little of value in detroit to take,so ya gotta leave detroit to take the value
[14:52] <jrwren> brousch: huh? the 94/96 interchange is pretty much downtown detroit.
[15:41] <rick_h_> ok, http://r.bmark.us/u/69b17e058207e2 is kind of cool
[15:45] <brousch> jrwren: Yeah, but that location compared to the Windsor Tunnel pushed the 25 mile radius to where I wanted it
[15:57] <jrwren> brousch: that makes good sense.
[16:22] <cmaloney> Wow, thats pretty expensive
[16:22] <cmaloney> But strangely enough I'd love to have one
[16:22] <cmaloney> just not sure $400+ is worth it.
[16:23] <greg-g> I dont' understand the appeal
[16:34] <jrwren> its a toy.
[16:34] <jrwren> some people love toys.
[16:35] <cmaloney> You could use it as an expensive security camera
[16:35] <cmaloney> or for a robot that needs 360 view.
[16:35] <jrwren> the applications are endless!
[16:36] <rick_h_> greg-g: they've got a panda-cam in the DC zoo, now it could be 360, and closer to the panda's butt than ever before!
[16:36] <greg-g> but no monitor can display 360* images, so you end up just looking at a stupidly stitched image or 4 separate and overlapping stills?
[16:36] <cmaloney> greg-g: Remember Quicktime VR?
[16:36] <cmaloney> You could do something similar to that without a whole lot of pain
[16:36] <greg-g> yeah, it sucked ass
[16:37] <cmaloney> Bah, it was revolutionary
[16:37] <greg-g> and died
[16:37] <cmaloney> you could see inside the star trek TNG enterprise
[16:37] <greg-g> ooohhhh boy!
[16:37] <greg-g> ;)
[16:37]  * greg-g stops being a troll
[16:37] <rick_h_> lol
[16:37] <cmaloney> Hey, you could see that the shuttle had a VT100 terminal in back
[16:37] <rick_h_> I think panda butts is a more compelling use case
[16:37] <cmaloney> Could also be useful for telepresence.
[16:38] <rick_h_> do you see what I see? all 360 degrees of it!
[16:38] <cmaloney> Or for a Paintball gun that nails the neighbor kids if they get too close to your lawn
[16:38] <greg-g> I don't see the telepresence benefit, honestly
[16:39] <rick_h_> greg-g: real estate!
[16:39] <cmaloney> greg-g: Museum tours
[16:39] <greg-g> now the anti-annoying neighbor use case, I'm on board
[16:39] <rick_h_> greg-g: you can walk around the whole house in 360
[16:39] <cmaloney> with shitty music!
[16:39] <greg-g> YES
[16:39] <rick_h_> woooo
[16:39] <rick_h_> now we're making $$
[16:39] <jrwren> you guys suck.
[16:39] <greg-g> SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY!
[16:39] <rick_h_> stick that thing on a roomba with wifi control
[16:39] <cmaloney> We could use Raspberry Pi robots to make real estate videos
[16:40] <cmaloney> with Brick Pi and Lego Mindstorms!
[16:40] <jrwren> prototype or STFU
[16:40] <greg-g> I'd totally invest in a rPi powered 360 degree camera telepresence robot with cloud connectivity for the enteprise environment.
[16:41] <greg-g> (bingo?)
[16:42] <cmaloney> And there you have it
[16:43] <cmaloney> And remember: the adult industry is usually at the forefront of technology
[16:43] <cmaloney> the possibilities are endless.
[16:43] <cmaloney> 360 view of a bored camera crew.
[16:44] <greg-g> porn without the camera crew.... oh wait....
[16:45] <cmaloney> Telepresence porno
[16:45] <cmaloney> thousands of robots trying to get a better look
[16:45] <greg-g> annnnnd on that note
[16:45] <cmaloney> I'm an idea machine
[16:46] <jrwren> when the first autonomous robot decides to interact in that "scene" we'll have something far worse than skynot on our hands.
[16:46] <cmaloney> PUPPIES WITH A 360 DEGREE WIDE-ANGLE LENS!
[16:46] <jrwren> tehkitties
[16:47] <greg-g> ef kitties, doggies are where its at
[16:47] <cmaloney> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=argCvDpk_KQ
[16:47] <cmaloney> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hc4DNmq-y8M
[16:47] <cmaloney> ;)
[16:48] <brousch> cmaloney: You could make money with the 360 degree puppycam
[16:48] <brousch> Need to wrap it in Kong material though
[17:41] <cmaloney> https://github.com/tony/tmuxp
[17:41] <cmaloney> I don't get it.
[21:56] <jrwren> when you stumble upon something and it makes you proud: https://github.com/libevent/libevent/blob/master/README#L216
[21:56] <jrwren> when you remember they were tiny, trivial, patches... *shrug*
[22:00] <cmaloney> jrwren: That's awesome. :)
[22:00] <cmaloney> It's moments like that which make me happy to be an OSS developer.
[22:00] <jrwren> me too
[22:01] <jrwren> i was doing a diff and happened upon the +Jay R. Wren in the README :)
[22:01] <jrwren> it made me happy
[22:01] <greg-g> heh, and I was just reading a discussion about how FB wrote their own event library and that they're using a forked version of libevent 1.x for their HipHopVM project
[22:01] <jrwren> I should send 'em more patches
[22:01] <greg-g> indeed
[22:01] <jrwren> greg-g: libevent gets a lot of abuse :(
[22:01] <jrwren> gevent isn't even using it anymore :(
[22:02] <greg-g> it makes our life hard at WMF as we want to use hhvm, but the libevent shit is blocking easy packaging
[22:02] <jrwren> ah yeah, I can see how that would be difficult
[22:02] <greg-g> they're at least having an open dialog with a debian developer about it
[22:02] <jrwren> did they fork in incompatibly?
[22:02] <greg-g> yeah
[22:02] <jrwren> how bad?
[22:02] <greg-g> enough?
[22:03]  * greg-g is exactly sure
[22:03] <jrwren> i was dealing with a fork too, but libevent is really great C code, its probably easy to work around
[22:03] <greg-g> but yeah, congrats :)
[22:03] <jrwren> oh its been there for a year. i just happened upon it today:)
[22:03] <greg-g> oh, h3eh
[22:03] <greg-g> -3
[22:03] <cmaloney> Still, congrats.
[22:04] <cmaloney> Just because it's old doesn't mean it's not worthy.