| RAOF | racarr: ^^^ Looks like kgunn would like the meeting to be on this week :) | 00:05 |
|---|---|---|
| racarr | Oi | 00:06 |
| RAOF | racarr: Oh, by the way - do we have an input driver model? | 00:23 |
| RAOF | My vague understanding of our current input stack is that it expects to open an evdev device and go to town. | 00:24 |
| RAOF | I ask this for the reasonably transparent reason that I'll soon be wanting to fold a touchpad driver into the mix. | 00:26 |
| racarr | RAOF: Yes basically open an evdev device and go to town | 00:33 |
| racarr | actually though all that is constrained to EventHub which emits droidinput::RawEvents | 00:34 |
| racarr | and you could call that the driver | 00:34 |
| RAOF | So I get to implement an input driver API. Huzzah! | 00:34 |
| racarr | but its hardly a driver model | 00:34 |
| racarr | RAOF: Living the dream ;) | 00:34 |
| duflu_ | Ping kgunn | 02:36 |
| === duflu_ is now known as duflu | ||
| RAOF | duflu: Maybe you can talk with him at the meeting this afternoon? :) | 03:06 |
| duflu | RAOF: That one that no one has come to for a month and I think we informally canceled? | 03:06 |
| RAOF | Yeah, that one. | 03:06 |
| RAOF | kgunn was on earlier mentioning that he was going to show up this time. | 03:07 |
| duflu | Awesome. If only anyone replied to my email about canceling it... or turned up | 03:08 |
| duflu | RAOF: Am I in the right hangout? I uninstalled my calendar plugin today so am guessing | 06:02 |
| RAOF | Gah. Why hasn't the email with the hangout link come in yet? | 06:03 |
| duflu | RAOF: No. I suspect kgunn canceled it after my email :) | 06:04 |
| RAOF | Still only static? | 06:05 |
| kgunn | RAOF: duflu i'm here...but meeting is in 1 hr i think | 06:06 |
| kgunn | we had daylight savings last weekend...bet that's the prob | 06:06 |
| duflu | kgunn: Oh. It's on your timezone? | 06:07 |
| duflu | kgunn: RAOF and I are in, and we don't expect anyone else | 06:07 |
| kgunn | hmmm....lemme check | 06:07 |
| kgunn | yeah...i'm showing 1 hr from now | 06:08 |
| kgunn | and alexandros is good about showing right ? | 06:08 |
| duflu | kgunn: We kind of agreed to cancel it after alf and I were the only attendees for several weeks :) | 06:09 |
| kgunn | yeah... | 06:09 |
| kgunn | we need to come up with a decent time | 06:09 |
| kgunn | i sort of feel like we should maybe have like 3 rotating spots or something | 06:10 |
| RAOF | Maybe. | 06:10 |
| duflu | kgunn: If you want to chat at all today, we're "all" in the hangout now :) | 06:11 |
| kgunn | ok | 06:11 |
| racarr | wait are wedoing it now? | 06:12 |
| tvoss_ | good morning | 06:20 |
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| mlankhorst | g'day | 08:31 |
| duflu | mlankhorst: hallo | 08:39 |
| mlankhorst | alf_: hey, did you ever end up merging the mesa / mir changes back? :P | 09:56 |
| alf_ | mlankhorst: are you referring to the EGLImage changes? | 09:56 |
| mlankhorst | yeah | 09:57 |
| alf_ | mlankhorst: yes, they are in RAOF's github repo | 09:57 |
| mlankhorst | ok what about the mir changes? | 09:57 |
| alf_ | mlankhorst: I don't remember exactly what additional changes were needed on the Mir side, but nested mir works now with lp:mir (or at least it worked last I checked) | 09:59 |
| mlankhorst | ah k | 10:00 |
| * alan_g smells a missing test case | 10:01 | |
| mlankhorst | hehehe, 'git merge ubuntu' on raof's branch then commenting out the mir patch in debian/patches/series works :P | 10:07 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|afk | ||
| === alan_g|afk is now known as alan_g | ||
| mlankhorst | alf_: but what about my fixes ? I disabled vt switching in the nested case | 11:40 |
| alf_ | mlankhorst: hmm, I am not sure... do you have a link to your changes/branch? | 11:41 |
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| mlankhorst | http://paste.debian.net/64293/ | 11:44 |
| alf_ | mlankhorst: instead of passing a nullptr it would preferable to pass a NullObject, in this case a NullVirtualTerminal. There is an implementation of that in include/test/mir_test_doubles/null_virtual_terminal.h, so we just move that to src/server/graphics/gbm and use it (and also change the tests to use that too) | 11:51 |
| mlankhorst | :/ | 11:53 |
| mlankhorst | hm lets see.. | 11:53 |
| mlankhorst | alf_: http://paste.debian.net/64300/ -- enjoy? | 12:16 |
| alf_ | mlankhorst: Looks good, thanks (only some nits). I will shepherd it into trunk if you want. | 12:19 |
| mlankhorst | please :) | 12:19 |
| alf_ | mlankhorst: ok | 12:20 |
| mlankhorst | seems acceptance-tests.ServerShutdown/OnSignal and ServerShutdown.server_removes_endpoint_on_abort hang? | 12:21 |
| alf_ | mlankhorst: Is it a consistently reproducible? I remember there was a bug about something similar, but I think it was resolved. | 12:23 |
| mlankhorst | sort of, it happens in my chroot | 12:25 |
| alf_ | mlankhorst: hmm, I get a consistent failure (not a hang) in ServerShutdown/OnSignal.removes_endpoint_on_signal/2 | 12:33 |
| alf_ | mlankhorst: ...but only if I run the tests manually. If I use ctest everthing works. | 12:34 |
| mlankhorst | oh seems to be random here | 12:34 |
| mlankhorst | some other tests can fail too | 12:34 |
| mlankhorst | heh maybe my system is too fast :P | 12:39 |
| mlankhorst | C++ exception with description "Failed to find server" thrown in the test body. | 12:40 |
| mlankhorst | /home/mlankhorst/nfs/xorg/mir/tests/mir_test_framework/testing_process_manager.cpp:240: Failure | 12:40 |
| mlankhorst | Value of: server_process_was_started | 12:40 |
| mlankhorst | Actual: false | 12:40 |
| mlankhorst | Expected: true | 12:40 |
| alf_ | mlankhorst: btw, are you using the latest development-branch? | 12:41 |
| mlankhorst | not sure, last commit i have is from nov 3 :P | 12:45 |
| mlankhorst | Restore: mir (0.1.0+14.04.20131030-0ubuntu1) trusty; urgency=low | 12:45 |
| mlankhorst | hm nov5 | 12:45 |
| alf_ | mlankhorst: ok | 12:46 |
| alf_ | mlankhorst: actually, the patch may not be needed after all... we create a different kind of platform when nested ("native platform") which doesn't use the VT at all | 12:58 |
| alf_ | mlankhorst: did you actually have a problem with the current state of the code? | 12:58 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch | ||
| dandrader | greyback, ping | 13:16 |
| greyback | dandrader: pong | 13:19 |
| dandrader | greyback, working on the mir-with-qtscenegraph prototype? | 13:20 |
| greyback | dandrader: yep | 13:20 |
| dandrader | greyback, let me know when you're something I could use to start experimenting with the input part of it | 13:21 |
| dandrader | greyback, or if you need help with it | 13:21 |
| dandrader | s/you're/you've | 13:21 |
| mlankhorst | alf_: oh is that different? :P | 13:23 |
| mlankhorst | i think it used to be needed | 13:23 |
| mlankhorst | my bad then | 13:23 |
| greyback | dandrader: thanks, I'll remember that :) I've a good day or 2 of hacking to get the basics going, but then I'll ping you | 13:25 |
| === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g | ||
| Prf_Jakob | alf_: hey | 15:01 |
| alf_ | alf_: hi! | 15:01 |
| alf_ | Prf_Jakob: hi! | 15:01 |
| Prf_Jakob | I'm thinking a bit longer term here, but would you guys be okay with using egl to accessing buffers? | 15:02 |
| Prf_Jakob | I'm thinking of trowing together a extension for shadowfb type blitting to images. | 15:02 |
| Prf_Jakob | (disclaimer: I'm on the EGL WG at Khronos). | 15:04 |
| alf_ | Prf_Jakob: Do you mean for the client to access buffers, or for the server to access buffers? | 15:04 |
| Prf_Jakob | It can be done in multiple ways, but one way would be that the server creates hardware image, you prime/dma-buf it over to the client (can be hidden in the toolkit) and then create a shadow on the client side which it uses for fast access. | 15:06 |
| Prf_Jakob | Alternativly you could prime over the shadow image. | 15:07 |
| Prf_Jakob | Both would require you to still load the hardware driver (in our case our mesa dri driver) in the client. | 15:08 |
| alf_ | Prf_Jakob: I think it would be a useful extension that will cover some of the direct pixel access use cases, although there would still be apps/toolkits that for whatever reason don't want to do EGL/GL at all. | 15:15 |
| alf_ | tvoss_: ^^ Was there a specific driving case for "software" buffers? | 15:15 |
| Prf_Jakob | alf_: yet they are okay with gbm :/ | 15:16 |
| tvoss_ | alf_, plymouth was the original one, yeah | 15:16 |
| alf_ | Prf_Jakob: that's a good point | 15:17 |
| Prf_Jakob | I mean at that point you have already pulled in the dri driver and all the gl bits into the process VM anyways. | 15:18 |
| alf_ | Prf_Jakob: Actually, a pure "software" client, doesn't load gbm. It currently only uses DRM to map dumb buffers. | 15:19 |
| Prf_Jakob | Ah | 15:19 |
| Prf_Jakob | Not to comfirtable putting that much of acceleration API in the kernel. | 15:20 |
| alf_ | Prf_Jakob: :) | 15:20 |
| Prf_Jakob | Trying to eat the gpu cake and keeping the not using gpu API cake. | 15:22 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|tea | ||
| === alan_g|tea is now known as alan_g | ||
| === dandrader is now known as dandrader|lunch | ||
| === dandrader|lunch is now known as dandrader | ||
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| kgunn | goin' to work out | 18:38 |
| === dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk | ||
| === dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader | ||
| === seb128 is now known as 3JTAAAD4U | ||
| racarr | finally making some good progress on my persistent goal of | 23:13 |
| racarr | improving theinput acceptance testing framework... | 23:13 |
| racarr | hopefully should be able to make an MP with a net line of codeloss :) | 23:13 |
| RAOF | Huzzah! | 23:14 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!