=== Guest90505 is now known as LoganCloud
=== LoganCloud is now known as Guest11784
=== Guest11784 is now known as LoganCloud
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
[05:24] <jose> wgrant: ping
=== wedgwood is now known as Guest32887
=== joey- is now known as joey
=== glebihan_ is now known as glebihan
=== stokachu_ is now known as stokachu
=== BradCrittenden is now known as bac
[13:41] <sreedevi> Hello, I am working on a minor bug in launchpad, I submitted a proposal to merge my branch to the main branch. This is pending for review, Could anyone please help me with this?
[13:47] <cjwatson> You're working on a project hosted on Launchpad, not on Launchpad itself
[13:47] <cjwatson> So we can't help you here
[13:47] <cjwatson> Try #ubuntu-motu
[13:48] <cjwatson> Alternatively, you could just wait - it's already listed in the sponsorship queue at http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring/
[13:48] <cjwatson> So it should be dealt with in not all that long
[13:50] <sreedevi> cjwatson: Ok, Thank you
[13:56] <sreedevi> cjwatson:I hope review will take time, right?
[13:59] <cjwatson> It probably won't be immediate
=== Guest32887 is now known as wedgwood
[14:22] <sreedevi> cjwatson:Ok
[14:22] <sreedevi> cjwatson :)
[17:20] <ibere_SP> hi, I'm a Lubuntu team member: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Ibere-Fernandes . Our Team Leader of Communications left the team and he was supposed to hand the ownership of https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-comms to me. He gave no somebody else that's not even active at Launchpad. Can you help us solve this mistake, pls?
[17:21] <ibere_SP> you can confirm the mistake by reading this thread: https://lists.launchpad.net/lubuntu-comms/
[17:26] <czajkowski> ibere_SP: you'll need to file a question on launchpad
[17:26] <czajkowski> ibere_SP:  https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion
[17:27] <ibere_SP> czajkowski, ok. Thank you. How long do they take to reply? Our Communications launchpad account has been handled to a complete stranger.
[17:28] <czajkowski> ibere_SP: it will be tomorrow as they are based in AU
[17:29] <czajkowski> or possibly 4 hrs time if you're based in the UK
[17:29] <czajkowski> timezones are messing with me this week
[17:29] <ibere_SP> czajkowski, ouch... Thank you for you reply. I'm based in Brazil. Isn't there any other fast track?
[17:30] <czajkowski> ibere_SP: has something been done to warrant the urgency?
[17:32] <ibere_SP> czajkowski, we've tried to contact the mistaken owner  but we had no reply yet. The other members of Lubuntu-comms are trying to contact him/her too. There's a discussion about it in the public list: https://lists.launchpad.net/lubuntu-comms/
[17:33] <czajkowski> ibere_SP: ok well the 4 hr wait then is the best thing tbh. wgrant and StevenK will be on in a few hours
[17:33] <ibere_SP> czajkowski, I've also contacted the previous lubuntu-comms Team Leader, but no reply either.
[17:33] <czajkowski> file the question and it'll be taken care of
[17:33] <czajkowski> ibere_SP: people dont always reply straight away.
[17:33] <ibere_SP> czajkowski, ok. thank you.
[17:33] <dobey> that doesn't sound urgent
[17:34] <ibere_SP> czajkowski, true. thank you.
[17:34] <dobey> annoying, but not a huge problem. it's not a private team or anything.
[17:34] <czajkowski> dobey: ello
[17:34] <dobey> hi czajkowski
[18:02] <Legendario> hi, is it possible to use launchpad to make debian packages for debian?
[18:03] <cjwatson> Not directly.  https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/188564
[18:03] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 188564 in Launchpad itself "Build also packages for Debian in PPA's" [Low,Triaged]
[18:04] <cjwatson> Of course you can host code in bzr branches on Launchpad that will be built for Debian
[18:50] <lfaraone> that's hilarious, I was just grepping my channel archives for that exact bug :)
[18:51] <cjwatson> lfaraone: firefox url bar -> "ppa debian" -> down arrow -> enter
[18:52] <lfaraone> cjwatson: so, https://code.google.com/p/debppa/ ? :P
[18:53] <cjwatson> shocking hosting of Debian facility on a non-free hosting service
[18:53]  * cjwatson trolls gently
[18:53] <lfaraone> "I thought SourceForge is open source?"
[18:54]  * lfaraone was once told by a Googler that Google Code was basically a forked SF codebase
[18:54] <cjwatson> quite an extensive fork I think ...
[18:55] <cjwatson> it just amuses me how when LP's code was unavailable everyone was "oh I have PRINCIPLES I'm not hosting things there" and now it's all "rah rah github rah rah google code"
[18:55] <lfaraone> cjwatson: but yeah, Debian-software-built-in-Launchpad is something my company would pay money for.
[18:56] <lfaraone> or rather, debs-built-for-Debian-via-Launchpad
[18:56] <cjwatson> if your company hasn't already told some kind of account managery person in Canonical then it probably should
[18:56] <lfaraone> cjwatson: feel free to PM me an email.
[18:56] <cjwatson> I'm not sure I have a suitable one
[18:56] <cjwatson> was hoping you already had a support contract or something
[18:57] <lfaraone> Hah. No, we're using Debian, but have customers who want to use Ubuntu. Hence the inquiry :)
[18:57] <cjwatson> for the most part I am happy for the money-dealing-with parts of the company to remain a mystery to me ;-)
[18:58] <cjwatson> I should see if I can track down the last internal thread I found about this, but it was years ago ... perhaps a longer-standing Launchpadder can remember better
[19:03] <dobey> lfaraone: the e-mail on the commercial launchpad page is probably the best place to contact for that
=== zorael is now known as zorael^
=== zorael^ is now known as zorael
=== zorael is now known as zorael^
=== zorael^ is now known as zorael
=== zorael is now known as zorael^
=== zorael^ is now known as zorael
=== zorael is now known as zorael^
=== zorael^ is now known as zorael
=== zorael is now known as zorael^
=== zorael^ is now known as zorael
[23:25] <czajkowski> wgrant: ello
[23:25] <wgrant> czajkowski: Hi
[23:25] <czajkowski> all quiet on the southern front :)
[23:28] <RAOF> Hm. Is there a way I can access the Launchpad API from client-side javascript? The naive approach runs into cross-site scripting limitations.
[23:28] <wgrant> RAOF: No, that would be a bit of a CSRF hole; a browser won't permit it.
[23:29] <RAOF> Is there any particular reason that the unauthenticated API couldn't have the "go to town" flag set?
[23:32] <wgrant> We could potentially enable some kind of CORS on the OAuth domain.
[23:34] <RAOF> Which is the basically the reverse of what I want, I think :)
[23:35] <RAOF> My goal is to embed a “latest version!” button that pulls the latest version data from my launchpad project page.
[23:36] <wgrant> RAOF: How's that the reverse?
[23:37] <RAOF> I wouldn't expect the clients to be OAuth'd?
[23:37] <RAOF> Oh, I guess I could embed the credentials in the website source.
[23:37] <wgrant> Ah, not quite.
[23:37]  * RAOF is, as you might have guessed, not a domain expert here :)
[23:37] <wgrant> api.launchpad.net requires OAuth, potentially anonymous OAuth
[23:37] <wgrant> launchpad.net/api uses your Launchpad HTTP cookie.
[23:38] <wgrant> It'd be safe to allow cross-origin requests to api.launchpad.net, because the presence of the user's cookie doesn't affect anything.