[07:19] <darkxst> ricotz, hi
[07:20] <ricotz> darkxst, hi
[07:20] <ricotz> just requested more space for the staging ppa
[07:20] <darkxst> can you push a new mozjs24 based on the RC, https://people.mozilla.org/~sstangl/mozjs-24.1.0.rc2.tar.bz2
[07:21] <darkxst> ricotz, oh cool!
[07:21] <darkxst> also a new snapshot of gjs wip/js24 branch
[07:21] <ricotz> darkxst, did they "fix" the library/pc-naming change?
[07:22] <darkxst> ricotz,  the so-name stuff? they won't take that upstream
[07:22] <ricotz> and the versioning of js-config
[07:22] <darkxst> oh yes, that is fixed in this RC
[07:23] <ricotz> no, i mean the pc files was called mozjs-24.1.pc and the soname was "bumped"
[07:24] <darkxst> right upstream branch was bumped to 24.1
[07:25] <darkxst> should the pc file not be versioned like that?
[07:25] <ricotz> they should keep the naming based on 24.0 imo
[07:26] <ricotz> otherwise if there are new releases every version bump will be a pita
[07:26] <darkxst> normally the new version are 24.0.x
[07:26] <ricotz> the whole package naming would have to change
[07:26] <darkxst> there must have been a ABI change I assume
[07:27] <ricotz> no, there scripting in this manner is just unfortunate
[07:28] <darkxst> no, someone specifically bumped it too 24.1
[07:28] <ricotz> to match it with firefox/thunderbird
[07:29] <darkxst> even firefox/thunderbird, don't normally have .1 releases
[07:30] <ricotz> if this is actually wanted, ok -- but afaics this is just following the versioning
[07:30] <ricotz> ok, it looked to me that they just stripped the "0" while it kind of never was used
[07:34] <darkxst> ricotz, I will double check with upstream
[07:34] <ricotz> darkxst, thanks
[07:59] <ricotz> darkxst, will push a package of rc2 to ricotz/staging
[08:01] <darkxst> ricotz, thanks, wip/js24 branch should work fine with rc2
[08:01] <ricotz> havent synced it with the debian changes yet though
[08:02] <ricotz> regarding multiarch
[08:03] <darkxst> ricotz, powerpc is broken, I know
[08:03] <darkxst> (on debian also)
[08:06] <darkxst> I had a quick look at their package, they missed the test fixes (which are still stuck in -proposed due to ppc failure)
[15:40] <x-Na_> Hmmh, any help coming from here conserning the situation where gnome-shell (3.8 or 3.10) crashes when using gdm and switching users?
[21:09] <Ace> hello?
[23:16] <darkxst> x-Na_, can you get a backtrace and add it to Bug 1247352