| === duflu_ is now known as duflu | ||
| pero | where can i get the actual extension for chromium's unity web apps? i've lost it and get it back it no matter what (reinstalling chromium-browser, unity-webapps-common, etc) | 03:17 |
|---|---|---|
| tvoss | Saviq, ping | 07:44 |
| tvoss | Saviq, for when you wake up: https://code.launchpad.net/~thomas-voss/unity-mir/refactor-oom-score-adj-to-rely-on-process-cpp/+merge/194797 | 07:47 |
| tvoss | and https://code.launchpad.net/~thomas-voss/unity-mir/refactor-process-group-operations-to-rely-on-process-cpp/+merge/194804 | 07:47 |
| Saviq | tvoss, I like all the red | 08:56 |
| === tjaalton_ is now known as tjaalton | ||
| tvoss | Saviq, :) | 09:14 |
| Saviq | tvoss, missing debian/control entry, though | 09:15 |
| tvoss | Saviq, yup, fixing | 09:16 |
| tvoss | Saviq, please don't top-approve, yet | 09:16 |
| Saviq | tvoss, k | 09:17 |
| tvoss | Saviq, updated | 09:23 |
| Saviq | tvoss, cheers | 09:23 |
| tvoss | Saviq, now if only jenkins was with us again | 09:24 |
| Saviq | tvoss, ;) | 09:24 |
| cooljckd | hi guys | 09:37 |
| cooljckd | anybody on the keyboard ? | 09:37 |
| cooljckd | i just wanted to ask you guys in there is any repo for ubuntu in mauritius | 09:39 |
| cooljckd | if* | 09:39 |
| cooljckd | i mean a server locally in mauritius | 09:40 |
| cooljckd | because the moment we have to download everything from the uk | 09:40 |
| cooljckd | and it sucks | 09:41 |
| cooljckd | to have to download updates on a daily basis from here with this type of bandwidth | 09:41 |
| cooljckd | i mean what would cost you make a git server on the island and commit resent security updates to it automatically from anywhere | 09:43 |
| greyback | cooljckd: you should be able to choose a repo closer geographically. Did you look in "Software & updates" ? | 09:43 |
| cooljckd | nop | 09:43 |
| cooljckd | it doesnt work that way | 09:44 |
| cooljckd | let me explain why | 09:44 |
| greyback | cooljckd: open that app, there's a dropdown for "Download from" where you can choose other servers | 09:44 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|afk | ||
| cooljckd | the local telecom company is a jerk all outgoing connection is being reroute to the uk | 09:45 |
| cooljckd | which make every bandwidth wise | 09:46 |
| cooljckd | suck | 09:46 |
| greyback | *all* outgoing connections? That's ridiculous | 09:46 |
| cooljckd | so even if you choose another repo it stills sucks | 09:46 |
| cooljckd | l know its crazy | 09:47 |
| greyback | well then you need to talk to your local telecom company | 09:47 |
| cooljckd | but seems they dont trust the local operators | 09:47 |
| greyback | routing all traffic half way around the world is crazy sounding | 09:47 |
| cooljckd | well all can be proven | 09:48 |
| cooljckd | of course | 09:48 |
| cooljckd | if you dought my info | 09:48 |
| cooljckd | just check for yourself | 09:48 |
| greyback | no I don't doubt you | 09:48 |
| cooljckd | so i've to the uk recently | 09:49 |
| cooljckd | i bandwidth there is 33 mb for the average jo | 09:49 |
| cooljckd | its cool to work there | 09:49 |
| cooljckd | dont get me wrong i love to travel but i still like my country | 09:50 |
| cooljckd | and im trying to find a way to make think ok for me and everybody using linux | 09:51 |
| cooljckd | in mauritius | 09:51 |
| cooljckd | have a better experience | 09:51 |
| cooljckd | using there fav os | 09:51 |
| greyback | sure. But unfortunately there's no mirror on Mauritius right now :( | 09:51 |
| cooljckd | was there any | 09:51 |
| greyback | not that I know of | 09:52 |
| cooljckd | i vpn and ssh to germany everyday | 09:52 |
| cooljckd | and i dont have any problem | 09:53 |
| cooljckd | working from out here | 09:53 |
| greyback | cooljckd: maybe there'd be interest in establishing a mirror. Have you talked with these guys: http://lugm.org/ | 09:53 |
| cooljckd | well i guess i just keep looking for a distro that can suit my needs | 09:54 |
| cooljckd | thanks for answering anyway | 09:54 |
| greyback | good luck | 09:54 |
| cooljckd | hehe | 09:54 |
| cooljckd | luck has nothing to do with this | 09:54 |
| cooljckd | its a teritorial thing | 09:55 |
| cooljckd | i mean you cant expect some windows lovers to let linux traffic out now can you | 09:55 |
| greyback | Well I'd hope your ISPs are linux users | 09:56 |
| cooljckd | well maybe someday maybe | 09:56 |
| cooljckd | in 30 years | 09:56 |
| cooljckd | perhaps | 09:56 |
| cooljckd | when worlds ends and the zombies invades | 09:57 |
| cooljckd | anyway i hope im still there then | 09:57 |
| cooljckd | bye | 09:57 |
| cooljckd | cheers | 09:57 |
| greyback | bye! Hope you find a solution somehow :) | 09:58 |
| === alan_g|afk is now known as alan_g | ||
| nic-doffay | tsdgeos, can we land this today? https://code.launchpad.net/~nicolas-doffay/unity8/search-history-persist/+merge/193935 | 11:11 |
| tsdgeos | nic-doffay: the landers are dead | 11:11 |
| nic-doffay | tsdgeos, ah still. | 11:12 |
| tsdgeos | nic-doffay: any reason you need it today? | 11:12 |
| tvoss | tsdgeos, the landers sounds a bit like the elders :) | 11:16 |
| tsdgeos | :D | 11:16 |
| nic-doffay | tsdgeos, not particularly. | 11:17 |
| tsdgeos | oka | 11:18 |
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| tsdgeos | dandrader: i added you to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1250412 | 11:36 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1250412 in Ubuntu UI Toolkit "InverseMouseArea does not work with TouchEvents" [Undecided,New] | 11:36 |
| tsdgeos | if you can share some thoughts on it | 11:36 |
| tsdgeos | it'd be cool | 11:36 |
| tsdgeos | dednick: man, i can't repro the crash anymore :( | 11:37 |
| dednick | tsdgeos: hm. | 11:37 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, well, it's an InverseMouseArea, not an InverseTouchArea. :P | 11:37 |
| tsdgeos | dandrader: i know | 11:38 |
| tsdgeos | dandrader: so i guess you're suggesting we strip the code that makes MouseArea work with TouchEvents? | 11:39 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, added a comment | 11:40 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, I don't think MouseArea has any code about touch events | 11:41 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, it's all in QQuickWindow | 11:41 |
| tsdgeos | QQuickWindow has | 11:41 |
| tsdgeos | let's kill it | 11:41 |
| tsdgeos | by your suggestion | 11:41 |
| tsdgeos | doesn't make any sense | 11:41 |
| tsdgeos | ok, you were joking | 11:42 |
| tsdgeos | i'll stop continuing your joke as it's obvious it's not working | 11:42 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, I wonder why they did it like that. If it's an optimization or something... | 11:42 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, I stumbled upon it while doing the "touch ownership" work. I had to use a Qt private API in order to dispatch a touch event to an item | 11:43 |
| dandrader | there's a QQuickItemPrivate::dispatchTouchEvent() "public" method that QQuickWindow calls | 11:43 |
| dandrader | intenally it just call QQuickItem::touchEvent() | 11:44 |
| dednick | tsdgeos: mine isn't either | 11:44 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, It might be worth proposing a Qt patch to make touch events go through the regular QObject::event | 11:45 |
| tsdgeos | dednick: maybe something changed at the model level that sends stuff in a different order | 11:45 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, in the worst case, if they reject it, we will at least know why they did it like that | 11:45 |
| tsdgeos | dandrader: good luck with that (yeah i've had a bad day with our Qt friends today) | 11:45 |
| tsdgeos | dednick: hopefully i'll be able to fake the test with the info you got yesterday, let's cross fingers :D | 11:46 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, well, I will hunt down the author of that dispatch code and ask why it's like that... | 11:48 |
| dandrader | (easier than proposing a patch) | 11:48 |
| tsdgeos | good luck :-) | 11:48 |
| tsdgeos | obviously they are ont sure it's right | 11:48 |
| tsdgeos | since the code has stuff like | 11:48 |
| tsdgeos | // XXX todo - should sendEvent be doing this? how does it relate to forwarded events? | 11:49 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, hmm, that's pretty old code, from the beginnings of QML. I bet it was just an overlooked... | 11:52 |
| dandrader | s/an// | 11:52 |
| tsdgeos | one can hope :-) | 11:52 |
| dandrader | :) | 11:52 |
| === boiko_ is now known as boiko | ||
| dandrader | ok, I'm motivated enough to come up with a patch now | 11:53 |
| Cimi | where is Unity.Application? | 11:53 |
| Cimi | in which package? | 11:53 |
| greyback | Cimi: libunity-mir1 | 11:55 |
| Cimi | greyback, it's already the newest version | 11:55 |
| Cimi | greyback, that means I have wrong includes maybe | 11:55 |
| greyback | Cimi: probably yeah | 11:57 |
| tsdgeos | unity-mir ? | 11:57 |
| tsdgeos | Cimi: ↑↑↑ | 11:57 |
| greyback | Mirv: ping | 11:57 |
| Saviq | om26er, re: https://code.launchpad.net/~om26er/unity8/helper_dont_try_unlock_if_already_unlocked/+merge/194839 | 11:59 |
| Saviq | om26er, IIUC the RuntimeWarning should be raised if it's already unlocked | 12:00 |
| Saviq | om26er, does that not happen for you? | 12:00 |
| Saviq | om26er, please make sure veebers has a look at that MP | 12:00 |
| om26er | Saviq, it seems to be not working here. with the screen unlocked it tried the swipe() and failed | 12:00 |
| om26er | Saviq, yes, I was going to email him that | 12:01 |
| Cimi | I added http://paste.ubuntu.com/6404934/ | 12:02 |
| Cimi | but it still doesn't find unity.application | 12:03 |
| Cimi | how do you do this in cake? | 12:03 |
| Mirv | greyback: pong | 12:03 |
| greyback | Mirv: heya, I think I know the answer to this before I ask, but worth a try: I'm working with Qt5.2 from the beta2 PPA. There wouldn't be debug symbols available for it, would there? | 12:04 |
| Mirv | greyback: those are compiled with -debug & CONFIG+=debug, so qtbase5-dbg, qtdeclarative5-dbg etc should in theory be what the doctor ordered? | 12:06 |
| greyback | Mirv: ah really?! Yay! | 12:07 |
| * greyback was searching for *-dbgsym, duhh | 12:07 | |
| greyback | Mirv: magic, thank you | 12:07 |
| Mirv | greyback: yeah, I kept those local changes from the trusty 5.1.1 builds. you're welcome. | 12:07 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, About Qt work: I should work on the "stable" branch, right? | 12:11 |
| tsdgeos | dandrader: stable is for 5.2.1, release is for 5.2.0, devel is for 5.3.0 | 12:11 |
| tsdgeos | at this point i thikn stable == rlease | 12:12 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, so I suppose things on stable are fed to devel? | 12:12 |
| tsdgeos | kind of | 12:12 |
| tsdgeos | i think so yes | 12:13 |
| Cimi | cmake ^^ | 12:29 |
| tsdgeos | dednick: meh i can't find a way to create a test that causes the crash | 12:40 |
| tsdgeos | mhr3: there was any release to any scope package yesterday? | 12:40 |
| tsdgeos | doesnt' seem like there was | 12:45 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, found a bug about the qquickitem::event issue https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-32004 | 12:50 |
| tsdgeos | :D | 12:50 |
| tsdgeos | now we just need them to fix it ;-) | 12:51 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, will try to get that bug from Frederik | 12:52 |
| tsdgeos | oka | 12:52 |
| mzanetti | mhr3: everything should be fixed now: https://code.launchpad.net/~mzanetti/unity8/music-preview/+merge/193803 | 13:03 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch | ||
| greyback | Wellark: ping | 13:05 |
| === dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk | ||
| mzanetti | Saviq: o/ | 13:11 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, welcome back | 13:11 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: thanks. from what I see jenkins is currently off | 13:11 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, yeah, in transit | 13:11 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: should I re-top-approve approved branches? | 13:12 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, if there are some that should be re-top-approved, sure | 13:12 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: e.g.: https://code.launchpad.net/~mzanetti/unity8/launcher-small-tweaks/+merge/191380 | 13:12 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, we're in auto mode now (well, when jenkins is back, that is) | 13:12 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: ah ok... yeah. wasn't sure if you still want to trigger one by one | 13:13 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, that one was never top-approved was it :) | 13:13 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: I think it was | 13:13 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, why would it be un-top-approved then? | 13:13 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, jenkins didn't report anything on it | 13:13 |
| Saviq | re: autolanding at least | 13:13 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: I assumed you un-approved them in order not to flood jenkins when it starts picking up stuff again | 13:14 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, ass-you-me | 13:14 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, I didn't un-approve anything, let me see my mail history | 13:14 |
| mzanetti | not sure I follow the whole pun | 13:14 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, "when you assume, you make an ass of u and me" | 13:15 |
| mzanetti | ah | 13:15 |
| greyback | sounded like an invitation to me ;) | 13:15 |
| Saviq | greyback, not for you | 13:15 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, on that note, I'm still able to break the view behind switching previews quite easily | 13:16 |
| * mzanetti checks | 13:16 | |
| greyback | Saviq: I can live with that | 13:17 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, just swipe between two previews at row boundary, or at category end | 13:17 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, seems to be easiest to reproduce with the last results in a scope | 13:18 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: ok. but this was working. | 13:18 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, it is working, but sometimes it isn't ;D | 13:18 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: with latest trunk it's 100% broken here | 13:18 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, maybe something else affected it | 13:19 |
| mhr3 | tsdgeosnot really, why? | 13:19 |
| mzanetti | I'll try to fix | 13:19 |
| mhr3 | tsdgeos, not really, why? | 13:20 |
| Saviq | tsdgeosnot | 13:20 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: shouldn't the Audio element use the media player service implicitly? | 13:22 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, that's a good question | 13:22 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, it could indeed | 13:22 |
| mzanetti | Saviq: I'd say yes. on meego it does for example | 13:22 |
| mzanetti | because we want *all* Audio {} elements to shut up when there is a phone call incoming for example | 13:23 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, yeah | 13:23 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, right, so once we provide a QtMultimedia backend for our media service, that would still work fine | 13:23 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, ok then, +1 | 13:23 |
| mzanetti | I'd say so | 13:24 |
| === dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader | ||
| mhr3 | mzanetti, wrt the music preview, could you make the whole track row clickable? | 13:27 |
| mzanetti | mhr3: technically sure. design-wise I personally wouldn't like that. let me ask rosie | 13:28 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, have you compiled qtdeclarative recently? | 13:38 |
| Saviq | dednick, "[nick-dedekind] Search label should hide when dash isn't focused: INPROGRESS" I think that was fixed | 13:48 |
| Saviq | dednick, and re: "[nick-dedekind] Replace the SEARCH label with current lens name or the search query (in double quotes) when page header goes out of view - proportionally to header's visible portion: INPROGRESS" please ask design folk that's still the desired solution | 13:48 |
| dednick | Saviq: partially. still available when previewing which screws it up becuse it tries to show keyboard. | 13:49 |
| Saviq | dednick, ok | 13:49 |
| dednick | ok, will ask about other one | 13:49 |
| Saviq | dednick, [...] as they've been iterating the search behaviour recently | 13:49 |
| dandrader | tsdgeos, nevermind. I had an outdated qtbase | 13:50 |
| === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g | ||
| hashken | I was trying out the GMail Unity Webapp | 13:54 |
| hashken | Whenever I open the GMail webapp from dash, GMail is just opened as a tab in the current Firefox Window and also there is no GMail icon in the launcher. | 13:54 |
| hashken | Searching online shows a lot of people facing such problems. | 13:55 |
| hashken | My impression was that when an webapp is opened it will open in it's own window with it's own icon and behave separately from firefox | 13:55 |
| hashken | What is the actual behavior that is to be expected? | 13:56 |
| mhr3 | Saviq, is there a way to take screenshots with mir now? | 13:58 |
| mhr3 | Saviq, designers miss that a lot :) | 13:59 |
| Saviq | mhr3, there's a script | 14:04 |
| mhr3 | Saviq, oh? | 14:04 |
| Saviq | mhr3, http://lmgtfy.com/?q=ubuntu+phone+mir+screenshot ;) | 14:05 |
| mhr3 | lmgtfy... :P | 14:05 |
| dednick | Saviq: so apparently the whole dash is being redesigned. so... | 14:06 |
| kgunn | dednick: !? | 14:08 |
| dednick | kgunn: well, i don't really know the extent of redesign, but the doc "Dash Visual Design 14.04" is no longer "entirely" valid. Some new dash toolkit coming in. | 14:09 |
| kgunn | dednick: ah..yeah | 14:10 |
| kgunn | dednick: less freaked out...that's the template stuff | 14:10 |
| dednick | kgunn: ok, just saw the doc. was just a bit of sensationalisation. | 14:13 |
| kgunn | dednick: well...where designers are involved...that's totally possible "let's start over!" :) | 14:14 |
| nic-doffay | Cimi, are you busy with this? https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity8/+bug/1152150 | 14:15 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1152150 in Unity 8 "[DASH] diagonal swipe is recognized as a scroll" [High,Confirmed] | 14:15 |
| Cimi | nic-doffay, we have to dig this probably outside shell | 14:29 |
| Saviq | nic-doffay, Cimi, yeah, it's a lower-level (Qt-level) thing | 14:35 |
| nic-doffay | Saviq, does your comment on this still stand currently? https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity8/+bug/1224552 | 14:41 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1224552 in Unity 8 "[Dash] Category expansion transition has varaible speeds" [High,Triaged] | 14:41 |
| nic-doffay | About measuring by the category height. | 14:41 |
| Saviq | nic-doffay, yes | 14:41 |
| nic-doffay | Saviq, what do you mean by a two-step animation? | 14:42 |
| Saviq | nic-doffay, only the visible part of the category should be resized / animated - the rest should be expanded / collapsed in one frame | 14:44 |
| Saviq | nic-doffay, so, when expanding → animate to shell height within a duration, then just change the height to the target value | 14:44 |
| Saviq | nic-doffay, when collapsing → change the height to shell height, then animate to target value | 14:45 |
| Saviq | nic-doffay, makes sense? | 14:45 |
| nic-doffay | Saviq, yep gotcha. | 14:48 |
| === dandrader is now known as dandrader|lunch | ||
| mhr3 | Saviq, need to pick your brainz - re the scopes plugin, your idea was to keep providing the current functionality and register new types different higher version, so we'd have qmlRegisterType<Scope>("Scope", 0, 1, ...) and qmlRegisterType<NewScope>("Scope", 0, 2, ...), is that right? | 15:15 |
| mhr3 | Saviq, and then when everything is "ready" we'd remove the 0.1 stuff? | 15:15 |
| Saviq | mhr3, yeah, sounds about right | 15:15 |
| Saviq | mhr3, and then the dash app would import 0.2 already | 15:15 |
| Saviq | mhr3, you could also have a completely separate plugin | 15:16 |
| Saviq | mhr3, if you went for a major version bump | 15:16 |
| Saviq | mhr3, then you'd install it in Unity.1, for example | 15:16 |
| mhr3 | Saviq, yea, i was just thinking which one makes more sense | 15:16 |
| Saviq | mhr3, depends on how similar the APIs will be | 15:16 |
| mhr3 | it's unlikely you'd use both at the same time... | 15:16 |
| mhr3 | well... ultimately the api is just exposing a bunch of models | 15:17 |
| Saviq | mhr3, also, for minor versions | 15:17 |
| mhr3 | so it could be kept fairly consistent | 15:17 |
| Saviq | mhr3, you can in theory use the same object, but mark certain methods as per-revision | 15:17 |
| mhr3 | don't think we'd need that atm | 15:17 |
| Saviq | yeah I know | 15:17 |
| Saviq | mhr3, I think it's fine to keep in a single plugin - this way you won't need to copy stuff around | 15:18 |
| mhr3 | Saviq, my current dilemma is whether to branch the repo and start removing stuff, or branch the repo and just start adding stuff :) | 15:19 |
| Saviq | mhr3, the versioning system is more about backwards compatibility, which we don't care about for the moment | 15:19 |
| Saviq | mhr3, the unity8 repo? | 15:19 |
| mhr3 | Saviq, no, the scopes plugin repo | 15:20 |
| Saviq | mhr3, for the new version, you mean? | 15:20 |
| Saviq | mhr3, what would you remove? | 15:20 |
| mhr3 | Saviq, yes, i'd basically remove everything old api related | 15:20 |
| mhr3 | so really just the headers would stay | 15:21 |
| mhr3 | not even all of them :) | 15:21 |
| Saviq | mhr3, well, we want both version to work for the time being, no? | 15:21 |
| Saviq | mhr3, from the same source? | 15:21 |
| mhr3 | do we? :) | 15:21 |
| mhr3 | that's my ultimate question i guess | 15:21 |
| Saviq | mhr3, I think so, yes, to support the current unity dash and the new dash app | 15:22 |
| Saviq | mhr3, well, plan is to transition to new scopes by 14.04 anyway, isn't it | 15:22 |
| mhr3 | in that case it's clear what needs to be done | 15:22 |
| Saviq | mhr3, so we'd remove the old plugin before then anyway | 15:22 |
| mhr3 | sil2100, that reminds me, zmqpp in universe yet? :) | 15:26 |
| vesar | Saviq, hi dude. Would you have any quick solution to my problem? I'm trying to run mzanetti's branch on device and when ./run_on_device -s it gives me following: http://paste.ubuntu.com/6405829/ | 15:27 |
| vesar | Saviq, I did also touch /userdata/.writable_image && reboot before that already | 15:28 |
| Cimi | mterry, hey | 15:32 |
| mterry | Cimi, hello! | 15:32 |
| Cimi | mterry, I tried running your latest revision on the desktop, it fails with unity.applciation | 15:36 |
| mhall119 | seb128: thostr_ is gone, but https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/client-1311-mediascanner-roadmap still need to be accepted for the uds-1311 sprint | 15:37 |
| mterry | Cimi, yeah, because we use OSKController or some such | 15:37 |
| Cimi | mterry, yes, but why doesn't work on the desktop? | 15:38 |
| Cimi | mterry, missing include? | 15:38 |
| seb128 | mhall119, can you do that? I've some launchpad issues from that box (need to remember it when I'm back to my desktop a bit later otherwise) | 15:38 |
| mterry | Cimi, no. Because the desktop doesn't provide a Unity.Application plugin, like Touch does. It will work on Touch, or you can point it at a mock Unity.Application on your desktop. unity8 builds a mock version for running on a desktop and I pointed the wizard at that when testing | 15:39 |
| seb128 | mhall119, or is there somebody else around who can accept it? | 15:39 |
| mterry | Cimi, let me see if I can find my command line | 15:39 |
| mterry | Cimi, nope, it's left my bash history. But basically I'd build unity8 trunk, then set QML2_IMPORT_PATH to unity8's builddir/tests/mocks/ or some such | 15:40 |
| mterry | Cimi, or just comment out the OSKController bit | 15:40 |
| mterry | Cimi, and the Unity.Application import | 15:40 |
| mhr3 | vesar, was that about the music-preview branch? | 15:41 |
| mhr3 | vesar, if so i should have that on my device in a sec | 15:41 |
| sil2100 | mhr3: yes! Actually it's in universe - 3.2.4 is enough? | 15:42 |
| mhr3 | where sec == ~10minutes :) | 15:42 |
| mhr3 | sil2100, are you sure about that? aren't you talking about zmq itself? we need the c++ bindings for it -> zmqpp | 15:43 |
| Cimi | mterry, ok | 15:45 |
| Cimi | mterry, I cannot test the wifi page, I don't have wifi on my virtual machine | 15:45 |
| mhall119 | seb128: I can, I just don't want to accept BPs for tracks that aren't mine, unless the track lead asks me to of course :) | 15:45 |
| Cimi | mterry, can you see what's working there until I get the phone working? (my ubuntu phone does not boot) | 15:46 |
| mhall119 | seb128: accepted, it'll be imported into summit in the next hour or so | 15:46 |
| mterry | Cimi, you are running saucy still? :) | 15:46 |
| seb128 | mhall119, thanks | 15:46 |
| mhall119 | np | 15:46 |
| Cimi | mterry, trusty | 15:46 |
| mterry | Cimi, OK, I can test | 15:46 |
| mterry | Cimi, which branch? | 15:46 |
| Cimi | mterry, yours | 15:46 |
| mterry | Cimi, k | 15:47 |
| tsdgeos | dednick: did my answer solve your concern about the test? | 15:48 |
| dednick | tsdgeos: yep. thanks | 15:51 |
| vesar | mhr3, no it's one launcher related branch | 16:03 |
| vesar | mhr3, thanks anyway | 16:03 |
| mhr3 | vesar, yea, sorry, don't have that one | 16:04 |
| mhall119 | davidcalle: ping me when you're around | 16:08 |
| davidcalle | mhall119, pong | 16:10 |
| mhall119 | davidcalle: hey, so I'm working on these scopes API docs | 16:11 |
| mhall119 | I started parting the python html docs, but then remembered that we should be promoting C, is that still correct? | 16:11 |
| mterry | Cimi, I don't see anything on the WiFi page in my branch | 16:12 |
| davidcalle | mhall119, it is, but server-side scopes can still be in Python | 16:12 |
| mterry | Cimi, I see the page, just no content. No stderr output either | 16:12 |
| Cimi | mterry, does the wifi plugin on the system settings work at least? | 16:12 |
| mterry | Cimi, fair question... | 16:12 |
| mhall119 | davidcalle: do you think we should make docs for both? | 16:12 |
| mterry | Cimi, yeah | 16:12 |
| Cimi | mterry, it's a good start | 16:13 |
| Cimi | mterry, I just need to get this bloody thing working | 16:13 |
| davidcalle | mhall119, I think so. Even if there is still no formal process to submit them for inclusion, the server is open to new scopes. | 16:13 |
| Cimi | thing = phone | 16:13 |
| mterry | Cimi, in case I didn't mention, I proposed the team branch for merging. So don't commit back to that same one if you land a wifi fix. I'd like to land the team branch and then propose further fixes directly to system-settings trunk | 16:14 |
| mhall119 | davidcalle: ok, one more thing, is there anything in the docs that indicates that a class is for a specific "section"? | 16:14 |
| mhall119 | like, there classes are for previews, these classes are for filtering, these classes are for the search scopes, etc | 16:14 |
| Cimi | mterry, ok | 16:14 |
| davidcalle | mhall119, I'm not sure about C scopes, but for Python ones, it's not that straightforward. Python scopes must have a set of methods with specific names which return specific objects. They are ran by the scope-runner app, which call these methods. | 16:16 |
| Cimi | mterry, ok phone works, how do I test the app on the phone? | 16:17 |
| mterry | Cimi, I haven't done it in a while.... if things still work the same, you should be able to actually install it | 16:18 |
| mterry | like the .deb | 16:18 |
| mterry | and reboot | 16:18 |
| Cimi | ok | 16:18 |
| Cimi | mterry, but the wizard? | 16:18 |
| davidcalle | mhall119, so, I can help you finding what is what in the doc, but I don't think it will be useful (for Python) if these "specific methods" are not documented as well. | 16:19 |
| mhall119 | davidcalle: are the docs at http://developer.ubuntu.com/api/devel/ubuntu-13.10/python/Unity-7.0.html sufficient for writing a python scope? | 16:21 |
| mhall119 | that's what I'm using | 16:21 |
| davidcalle | mhall119, not without a tuto. | 16:25 |
| mhall119 | ok, well we have a tutorial for C, so I'll concentrate on those docs first | 16:25 |
| mhall119 | davidcalle: these giraffe docs are pretty sparse though, is there anywhere I can get a short description of what each class is used for, and perhaps what each method does? | 16:26 |
| === om26er is now known as om26er|food | ||
| davidcalle | mhall119, not that I know of. A lot of them are used by the scope-runner, not by scopes themselves, that's probably why they are not very explicit. | 16:35 |
| davidcalle | mhall119, I could get you some info about those that are actually used in scopes | 16:36 |
| tsdgeos | Saviq: http://pastebin.kde.org/pcfzadvzl :-) | 16:39 |
| tsdgeos | Saviq: looks "good enough" to me | 16:39 |
| tsdgeos | gonna run the tests now to see if it regresses something and will add my test too | 16:40 |
| tsdgeos | and submit | 16:40 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, "QV8Engine" :? | 16:40 |
| tsdgeos | Saviq: yeah the naming is amazing :D | 16:41 |
| Saviq | too many Vs | 16:41 |
| tsdgeos | their "semi-public" class is still called QV8Engine | 16:41 |
| tsdgeos | so they now have a QV8Engine::getV4() | 16:42 |
| tsdgeos | :D | 16:42 |
| tsdgeos | wonder why | 16:42 |
| === dandrader|lunch is now known as dandrader | ||
| Saviq | tsdgeos, cool, thanks for pushing | 16:42 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, it did feel it's an omission as opposed to a conscious decision... | 16:42 |
| tsdgeos | it does | 16:43 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, so that fixes the original 5.0 bug, too, I expect? | 16:43 |
| tsdgeos | Saviq: sure | 16:43 |
| tsdgeos | you you don't need the "variable" anymore | 16:43 |
| Saviq | cool beanz | 16:43 |
| tsdgeos | just pass it around and that's it | 16:44 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, awesome | 16:44 |
| nic-doffay | Saviq, are you aware of any property in FilterGrid which is bound to the shell height? | 17:00 |
| Saviq | nic-doffay, there isn't one, but it shouldn't be there | 17:00 |
| Saviq | nic-doffay, it's the LVWPH that should control that animation, so that it's consistent regardless of whether FilterGrid is used or anything else | 17:01 |
| nic-doffay | Saviq, I'm not sure I follow. Must the FilterGrid animation be removed then? | 17:03 |
| === om26er|food is now known as om26er | ||
| Saviq | nic-doffay, there's two separate animations there - we should think of fixing that | 17:04 |
| Saviq | nic-doffay, tsdgeos will know more, please make sure to talk to him about this tomorrow | 17:05 |
| tsdgeos | that's going to be a bit of a pain | 17:06 |
| tsdgeos | but yeah let's talk tomorrow | 17:06 |
| * tsdgeos eods | 17:06 | |
| Saviq | nic-doffay, but yeah, it feels like there should be no animation on height in FilterGrid itself, but there's probably a reason why it'st here | 17:07 |
| === jhodapp is now known as jhodapp|lunch | ||
| Wellark | greyback: pong | 17:10 |
| Wellark | greyback: sorry, didn't notice your ping on "this side" before | 17:10 |
| greyback | Wellark: no problem, I found what I needed anyway. | 17:10 |
| nic-doffay | Saviq, sure. | 17:10 |
| === dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk | ||
| === dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader | ||
| didrocks | mhall119: the french loco would want to discuss about their DPI (Dash Privacy Interface) at vUDS. Do you have a slot for it? https://blueprints.launchpad.net/dash-privacy-interface/+spec/community-1311-loco-projects-introducing-dash-privacy-interface | 17:57 |
| didrocks | mhall119: preferably in the last day slots | 17:58 |
| === jhodapp|lunch is now known as jhodapp | ||
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD | ||
| === salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
| === jhodapp is now known as jhodapp|afk | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!