| RAOF | Gah. Do we need another ‘how can we get SRUs to not be pointless-makework-for-all-concerned’ session? | 00:41 |
|---|---|---|
| RAOF | Also, VALAAAAAAAAAAAAA! | 00:56 |
| stgraber | RAOF: why did you release lilypond when some of the architectures failed to build? | 01:00 |
| stgraber | (powerpc regressed) | 01:00 |
| RAOF | Oh, I saw the arm64 dep-wait and went “ok, that's not important”. Didn't process the powerpc regression. :( | 01:01 |
| RAOF | Oops! | 01:01 |
| stgraber | slangasek: if you're around, bug 1250611 seems related to the recent shim-signed update | 01:42 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1250611 in grub2 (Ubuntu) "shim-signed update unrecognized option" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1250611 | 01:42 |
| stgraber | RAOF: around? | 02:12 |
| RAOF | stgraber: Yeah. | 02:13 |
| stgraber | RAOF: so I'm looking into bug 1250611 now, looks like we'll need a partial revert of shim-signed. I'm doing some tests now to figure out which release we need to revert and I'll be doing the uploads. Would be nice if you could do a speedy review once they hit the queue. | 02:13 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1250611 in grub2 (Ubuntu) "shim-signed update unrecognized option" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1250611 | 02:13 |
| stgraber | my plan is to let them build, then release to -updates immediately to fix the breakage | 02:14 |
| stgraber | confirmed to be limited to precise. I'll upload a simple revert of that part of the diff and let slangasek figure out whether we want to backport the grub-install option or not | 02:15 |
| RAOF | Sure. That sounds like a reasonable plan. | 02:17 |
| stgraber | RAOF: uploaded now, should be in the queue shortly | 02:17 |
| stgraber | I'll re-open the original bug report too since the revert also means that bug won't be fixed | 02:17 |
| RAOF | Ta. | 02:17 |
| stgraber | RAOF: it's in New because it's a source that doesn't exist in the release pocket | 02:19 |
| stgraber | RAOF: so you'll need to manually accept it and make sure to override it to main | 02:19 |
| RAOF | I just love manual steps I can get wrong :) | 02:20 |
| RAOF | stgraber: Accepted. | 02:22 |
| RAOF | Enjoy your meal! | 02:22 |
| stgraber | good. I'll let it build, test on a clean precise box this time (since apparently the one I used for the previous SRU had a backported grub ...) | 02:22 |
| stgraber | and if all checks out, release to -updates | 02:22 |
| RAOF | Should we be blocking the previous update while this is happening? | 02:24 |
| * RAOF doesn't know how to do that, but it seems like the existing upgrade is almost guaranteed to break | 02:24 | |
| stgraber | well, we could remove it or set its phased-percentage to 0 but that'd take one publisher run to happen and my plan is to have the new one tested by that time anyway | 02:24 |
| RAOF | stgraber: Fair enough. | 02:25 |
| stgraber | and there it's, build already, testing that one now | 02:25 |
| stgraber | fixed package confirmed to work here | 02:26 |
| stgraber | RAOF: can you run sru-accept -p shim-signed -v 1.5~12.04.2 -s precise 1250611 ? | 02:27 |
| stgraber | that'll push the usual bug comment | 02:27 |
| stgraber | (the package was wrong in the bug report, so if you did it previously, it probably failed) | 02:28 |
| stgraber | RAOF: sru released, ignore that sru-accept, it'd just be even more confusing if the blurb was posted after the SRU is released :) | 02:33 |
| stgraber | ok, I think that particular mess has been resolved. | 02:37 |
| * stgraber gets back to his evening activities | 02:38 | |
| slangasek | stgraber: thanks for the quick reaction on the shim-signed regression. I guess no one ever actually ran through the test case that was on the SRU bug? | 04:30 |
| slangasek | (at least, not for precise) | 04:31 |
| chrisccoulson | could someone please approve that flash upload before i upload the other releases? ^^ | 16:06 |
| chrisccoulson | jdstrand, would you mind approving flash please? :) | 16:25 |
| jdstrand | chrisccoulson: done | 16:31 |
| chrisccoulson | jdstrand, thanks. i've just uploaded the others now | 16:32 |
| jdstrand | chrisccoulson: done | 16:33 |
| chrisccoulson | thanks | 16:33 |
| jdstrand | chrisccoulson: oh, interesting, saucy didn't have it in release | 16:34 |
| jdstrand | that will obviously get fixed today | 16:35 |
| chrisccoulson | jdstrand, yeah, this is the first flash upload since saucy was released, and i don't normally do partner uploads before the release | 16:35 |
| jdstrand | I see | 16:35 |
| seb128 | could somebody review/approve https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/raring/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=popularity-contest ? | 18:43 |
| seb128 | (that's a SRU for raring, it has a buggy popularity-contest that sends report to Debian ... which the Debian guys have been complaining about for a while) | 18:44 |
| seb128 | (we got it fixed in saucy but didn't backport the fix to raring and it seems they keep getting report, I would like to reply to there email telling that we got the SRU in) | 18:45 |
| stgraber | seb128: done | 19:56 |
| seb128 | stgraber, thanks! | 20:02 |
| === doko_ is now known as doko | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!