[00:41] <RAOF> Gah. Do we need another ‘how can we get SRUs to not be pointless-makework-for-all-concerned’ session?
[00:56] <RAOF> Also, VALAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
[01:00] <stgraber> RAOF: why did you release lilypond when some of the architectures failed to build?
[01:00] <stgraber> (powerpc regressed)
[01:01] <RAOF> Oh, I saw the arm64 dep-wait and went “ok, that's not important”. Didn't process the powerpc regression. :(
[01:01] <RAOF> Oops!
[01:42] <stgraber> slangasek: if you're around, bug 1250611 seems related to the recent shim-signed update
[01:42] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1250611 in grub2 (Ubuntu) "shim-signed update unrecognized option" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1250611
[02:12] <stgraber> RAOF: around?
[02:13] <RAOF> stgraber: Yeah.
[02:13] <stgraber> RAOF: so I'm looking into bug 1250611 now, looks like we'll need a partial revert of shim-signed. I'm doing some tests now to figure out which release we need to revert and I'll be doing the uploads. Would be nice if you could do a speedy review once they hit the queue.
[02:13] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1250611 in grub2 (Ubuntu) "shim-signed update unrecognized option" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1250611
[02:14] <stgraber> my plan is to let them build, then release to -updates immediately to fix the breakage
[02:15] <stgraber> confirmed to be limited to precise. I'll upload a simple revert of that part of the diff and let slangasek figure out whether we want to backport the grub-install option or not
[02:17] <RAOF> Sure. That sounds like a reasonable plan.
[02:17] <stgraber> RAOF: uploaded now, should be in the queue shortly
[02:17] <stgraber> I'll re-open the original bug report too since the revert also means that bug won't be fixed
[02:17] <RAOF> Ta.
[02:19] <stgraber> RAOF: it's in New because it's a source that doesn't exist in the release pocket
[02:19] <stgraber> RAOF: so you'll need to manually accept it and make sure to override it to main
[02:20] <RAOF> I just love manual steps I can get wrong :)
[02:22] <RAOF> stgraber: Accepted.
[02:22] <RAOF> Enjoy your meal!
[02:22] <stgraber> good. I'll let it build, test on a clean precise box this time (since apparently the one I used for the previous SRU had a backported grub ...)
[02:22] <stgraber> and if all checks out, release to -updates
[02:24] <RAOF> Should we be blocking the previous update while this is happening?
[02:24]  * RAOF doesn't know how to do that, but it seems like the existing upgrade is almost guaranteed to break
[02:24] <stgraber> well, we could remove it or set its phased-percentage to 0 but that'd take one publisher run to happen and my plan is to have the new one tested by that time anyway
[02:25] <RAOF> stgraber: Fair enough.
[02:25] <stgraber> and there it's, build already, testing that one now
[02:26] <stgraber> fixed package confirmed to work here
[02:27] <stgraber> RAOF: can you run sru-accept -p shim-signed -v 1.5~12.04.2 -s precise 1250611 ?
[02:27] <stgraber> that'll push the usual bug comment
[02:28] <stgraber> (the package was wrong in the bug report, so if you did it previously, it probably failed)
[02:33] <stgraber> RAOF: sru released, ignore that sru-accept, it'd just be even more confusing if the blurb was posted after the SRU is released :)
[02:37] <stgraber> ok, I think that particular mess has been resolved.
[02:38]  * stgraber gets back to his evening activities
[04:30] <slangasek> stgraber: thanks for the quick reaction on the shim-signed regression.  I guess no one ever actually ran through the test case that was on the SRU bug?
[04:31] <slangasek> (at least, not for precise)
[16:06] <chrisccoulson> could someone please approve that flash upload before i upload the other releases? ^^
[16:25] <chrisccoulson> jdstrand, would you mind approving flash please? :)
[16:31] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson: done
[16:32] <chrisccoulson> jdstrand, thanks. i've just uploaded the others now
[16:33] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson: done
[16:33] <chrisccoulson> thanks
[16:34] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson: oh, interesting, saucy didn't have it in release
[16:35] <jdstrand> that will obviously get fixed today
[16:35] <chrisccoulson> jdstrand, yeah, this is the first flash upload since saucy was released, and i don't normally do partner uploads before the release
[16:35] <jdstrand> I see
[18:43] <seb128> could somebody review/approve https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/raring/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=popularity-contest ?
[18:44] <seb128> (that's a SRU for raring, it has a buggy popularity-contest that sends report to Debian ... which the Debian guys have been complaining about for a while)
[18:45] <seb128> (we got it fixed in saucy but didn't backport the fix to raring and it seems they keep getting report, I would like to reply to there email telling that we got the SRU in)
[19:56] <stgraber> seb128: done
[20:02] <seb128> stgraber, thanks!