[08:33] <dholbach> hiya
[08:34] <dholbach> are recipe pages timing out for anyone else?
[08:34] <dholbach> https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-packaging-guide-team/+recipe/ubuntu-packaging-guide-daily
[08:34] <dholbach> https://code.launchpad.net/~uak-admins/+recipe/uak-daily
[08:35] <StevenK> https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1201984 ?
[08:41] <dholbach> ah thanks StevenK
[09:52] <dodiesis> Hi all!
[09:52] <dodiesis> I need some help in suing the launchpad http API
[09:52] <dodiesis> I have to retrieve the personal project of an user
[09:52] <dodiesis> the same list I have when I go at https://launchpad.net/~dodiesis/+related-projects
[09:52] <dodiesis> of course I need it not in html... but in json
[09:53] <dodiesis> I tried with
[09:53] <dodiesis> wget -qO- https://api.launchpad.net/1.0/~dodiesis
[09:53] <dodiesis> but it does not contains what I need
[09:53] <dodiesis> Any help please?
[09:53] <dodiesis> probably something like
[09:53] <dodiesis> wget -qO- 'https://api.launchpad.net/1.0/projects?ws.op=latest&user=dodiesis'
[09:53] <dodiesis> Tnx!
[09:54] <wgrant> dodiesis: There isn't currently an API to retrieve that information.
[09:56] <dodiesis> wgrant: ok thanks... I read the docs.. I thought I was missing something
[09:57] <dodiesis> I will hack the html then, thanks
[09:57] <wgrant> Launchpad deals with a lot of different types of data in a lot of different ways, and there sadly isn't an API for everything yet.
[09:59] <dodiesis> no prob! I already did the html way.. I'm just afraid that someone will change the html-css... and my work wont work anymore
[10:00] <dodiesis> anyway: do you have some better hints that parsing the html from the website?
[10:00] <dodiesis> s/that/than/
[10:00] <wgrant> That's the only place that information is exposed today, I'm afraid.
[10:00] <dodiesis> ok tnx!
[10:01] <dodiesis> tnx.. bye!
[10:45] <ArcticLight> Hello, I have a question about Ubuntu Launchpad bugs... Is it possible to A) mark a bug as a possible regression and/or B) note which versions of Ubuntu contain the bug?
[22:52] <slackner> is there any possibility to speed up builds a bit / increase priority? 12 hours of wait time for an update (actual build time <1min) that fixes a remote code execution is a bit too long at my opinion :-/
[22:58] <wgrant> slackner: Sure, do you have links to the builds in question?
[22:59] <slackner> wgrant: https://code.launchpad.net/~mqchael/+recipe/pipelight-release
[23:00] <slackner> wgrant: thx :O :)
[23:01] <wgrant> :)
[23:07] <ehoover> wgrant: can open source projects buy a commercial PPA?
[23:08] <wgrant> ehoover: Sure.
[23:09] <wgrant> ehoover: Activating a commercial subscription on an open source project is slightly awkward, though: you need to add "Other/Proprietary" to the licenses, at least until you activate the subscription.
[23:09] <ehoover> wgrant: is it still $250? and would this for sure bump our build priority?
[23:10] <ehoover> wgrant: interesting, so it won't let you buy the subscription until you set the license that way?
[23:12] <wgrant> ehoover: Private PPAs always get a very high score, and we can add per-PPA score bumps for public PPAs for projects with a commercial subscription.
[23:12] <wgrant> There's no price difference, and indeed, you can't easily trigger the subscription purchase without having a commercial-requiring license set on the project at the moment.
[23:14] <ehoover> wgrant: ok, right now we put our builds in a couple of different PPAs - i assume we'd either have to consolidate or pay that $250 twice, is that accurate?
[23:15] <wgrant> ehoover: No, multiple PPAs are fine as long as they're roughly related to the one project.
[23:16] <ehoover> wgrant: awesome, at the moment we're split out as "netflix-desktop" and "pipelight" - but we've mostly consolidated over into the "pipelight" team except for PPAs
[23:16] <wgrant> Either way is fine :)
[23:21] <ehoover> wgrant: so, how should we setup our projects so that once we do this that it recognizes they're connected?
[23:23] <wgrant> ehoover: I'll need to do it manually for this case. So poke me or email commercial@launchpad.net.
[23:25] <ehoover> wgrant: ok, i'll chat with everyone and probably come back to you tomorrow :)
[23:30] <DarkPlayer> wgrant: in case we would decide for this option, would it be possible to change the owner of a ppa to a team without changing the repository url?
[23:32] <wgrant> DarkPlayer: Uhh, not really but sort of. You'd have to copy the packages from the PPA into some temporary archive, delete the PPA, rename the old owner, create a team in its place, create a new PPA with the same name as the old one, then copy the packages back in. But that would end up with a different archive signing key.
[23:33] <wgrant> You could alternatively add a team as an additional uploader for the existing PPA.
[23:34] <DarkPlayer> wgrant: the second options seems much more feasible, didn't know that it is possible
[23:35] <wgrant> It's not well-advertised, but you can use the API's newComponentUploader method on a PPA.
[23:35] <DarkPlayer> wgrant: okay, i am already used to the launchpad api to collect statistics
[23:36] <ehoover> ooo, fancy :)
[23:40] <maxb> obscure detail - that permits uploads, but not package deletions (last time I checked)
[23:40] <wgrant> Ah yes, true.
[23:41] <ehoover> eh, we can just contact each other if a deletion is necessary - that's not as critical as getting the new builds up
[23:53] <maxb> I should also say: thanks very very much for netflix-desktop :-) - it amused me no end when it took me 5 minutes to get netflix working on Ubuntu, compared to taking my brother something like an hour of struggling with Silverlight on Windows :-)