[02:54] <bjf> xnox, yup, well aware of the issues with the interlock schedule
[08:24] <diwic> Hi, I'm trying to decipher the workflow schedule...but not sure what everything means, so I'm just asking instead:
[08:25] <diwic> If I'm making a patch that I want to go into linux-lts-raring, when is my next deadline?
[08:28] <apw> diwic, i believe this was prep-week, so the next prep week is in two weeks time, but i am not authorative 
[08:33] <apw> diwic, that seems to jell with most of the kernels being in prepare or copy to proposed right now
[08:34] <apw> diwic, make sense?
[08:35] <diwic> apw, ok, thanks, so two weeks then...that should definitely be doable to get the hda backport in until then, I think
[09:16] <apw> diwic, there is always another cycle after as well
[09:18] <diwic> apw, right, but I understand this is urgent enough to warrant backporting, otherwise we could just wait for 12.04.4 instead
[09:28] <apw> diwic, if this is a big scarey patch set, you want it out for review sooner rather than later, so we have time to digest it
[09:29] <diwic> apw, fair enough, plan is to do it early next week
[14:57] <rtg> apw, did you see bug #1251035 ?
[14:57] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1251035 in linux (Ubuntu) "kernel stack trace when running openvswitch DEP-8 tests" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1251035
[15:24] <apw> rtg, will have a look, thanks
[15:25] <rtg> apw, I already bugged james on #ubuntu-server
[15:25] <apw> rtg, i have just pushed an update to unstable to reenable overlayfs
[15:25] <rtg> apw, good thing you let me know. was just rebasing against the latest merge
[15:26] <rtg> apw, hmm, not seeing it.
[15:37] <apw> rtg, try that
[15:37] <apw> rtg, it should be rebaseable
[15:37] <rtg> apw, better.
[15:41] <ppisati> back in 20
[15:48] <rtg> apw, pushed unstable, now build testing
[16:12] <bjf> ppisati, R U back ?
[16:25] <ppisati> bjf: yep
[16:31] <bjf> ppisati, bug 1248504 has a patch. is it waiting on anything to be submitted?
[16:31] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1248504 in linux (Ubuntu Saucy) "[saucy] [armhf] [calxeda] add mac address learning capabilities" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1248504
[16:32] <bjf> ppisati, same for bug 1248492
[16:32] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1248492 in linux (Ubuntu Saucy) "[saucy] [armhf] use pstore to save console log messages" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1248492
[21:11] <hallyn_> apw: hey, i think commit e51db73532955dc5eaba4235e62b74b460709d5b in trusty kernel is causing me grief.  (haven't tested a revert of it yet, but it seems the likely culprit)  Do you know where that one came into the tree?  (It's not in Linus' tree)
[21:11] <hallyn_> oh, or is it.  frown.
[21:11] <hallyn_> nm, i'm misplacing my blame.  i'll find the real culprit
[22:09]  * rtg -> EOD
[22:24] <apw> hallyn_, let me know what you find, indeed
[22:28] <hallyn_> apw: yeah, waiting for a tes kernenl to build.  at this point i have no idea why, just know i can't mount proc in a child userns
[22:29] <hallyn_> guess i should be bulding on tangerine.  inside kvm is just silly