| NikTh | How much time is needed for the change of the preferred contact address to take effect ? | 00:21 |
|---|---|---|
| wgrant | NikTh: I'm not sure. @ubuntu.com email aliases aren't managed by Launchpad; they're maintained by a Canonical IS script that just looks at Launchpad users and their preferred addresses. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuEmail is the documentation. | 00:36 |
| NikTh | wgrant: Thanks for the answer. What is matters most ? The preferred address in login.ubuntu.com or the preferred contact address in launchpad ? I guess the latest, but I need a second opinion. | 00:38 |
| wgrant | NikTh: The latter. | 00:38 |
| NikTh | wgrant: Is it necessary to open a question in "launchpad.answers" for the delay or I must wait for 24 hours at least ? What is your opinion ? Right now I have a delay of 4 hours almost. | 00:41 |
| NikTh | I have changed the preferred contact address, but some messages still coming in old address. Especially messages from mailing lists where I'm a subscriber with the @ubuntu.com alias. | 00:43 |
| benonsoftware | I just want to quickly add that I've been waiting a few days for my alias to change too. :) | 00:44 |
| NikTh | benonsoftware: Thank you for the info. | 00:44 |
| NikTh | So, the most appropriate will be to wait 24 up to 48 hours before I open a question for "Launchpad itself". | 00:45 |
| wgrant | NikTh: Hm, did some document say to open a question? | 00:46 |
| wgrant | Again, this isn't Launchpad functionality. | 00:46 |
| wgrant | It's a script managed by Canonical's IS team that happens to scrape data from Launchpad. | 00:47 |
| wgrant | The wiki page I linked suggests to email rt@ubuntu.com. | 00:47 |
| wgrant | The Launchpad team can't assist with this. | 00:47 |
| NikTh | wgrant: The wiki page you linked , I didn't read it ,yet. Sorry. I'm going for reading, right now. Thanks. | 00:49 |
| wgrant | NikTh: Oh, you've only waited four hours so far? | 00:50 |
| wgrant | AFAIK the script only runs daily at the very most. | 00:50 |
| wgrant | But some changes can take much longer to happen automatically. | 00:50 |
| wgrant | Four hours is nothing :) | 00:50 |
| NikTh | wgrant: Thanks for the help. | 00:52 |
| arun | wgrant: hello bro are u there? | 08:39 |
| arun_ | wgrant: are u there brother?? | 08:43 |
| arun_ | hello guys | 10:27 |
| arun_ | wgrant: are u there brother? | 10:41 |
| shadeslayer_ | hi, could someone explain https://code.launchpad.net/~netrunner-os/+archive/build-patch/+recipebuild/585780 | 20:16 |
| shadeslayer_ | the version in the PPA doesn't have an epoch | 20:16 |
| shadeslayer_ | but the one that it's trying to upload should have one | 20:16 |
| maxb | shadeslayer_: epochs are kind of weird - they count when it comes to evaluating version numbers, but don't show up in filenames everywhere you might expect them to | 21:31 |
| shadeslayer_ | yeah | 21:31 |
| shadeslayer_ | which is just weird | 21:31 |
| shadeslayer_ | I bumped it to 0ubuntu1.1 | 21:31 |
| shadeslayer_ | since I needed the epoch | 21:31 |
| maxb | I think it's likely an intentional decision in order to work better with un-epoched .orig.tar.gz files | 21:31 |
| maxb | Though clearly that looks a little on the pointless side when dealing with a native-format package | 21:32 |
| === nesthib is now known as Guest46214 | ||
| === Guest46214 is now known as nesthib | ||
| maxb | I think the general design idea is that versions should be unique even when ignoring the epoch, and the epoch is only there to force ordering comparisons to behave differently | 21:35 |
| shadeslayer_ | Got it :) | 21:52 |
| lifeless | the epoch is there to fix mistakes, thats all | 21:55 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!