[00:39] <Noskcaj> How do i tell why the bzr branch of a debian package hasn't updated? videocut in this case
[00:48] <slangasek> Noskcaj: http://package-import.ubuntu.com/status/
[00:49] <Noskcaj> thanks
[00:51] <slangasek> that page doesn't show any problems with videocut, though
[00:55] <Noskcaj> slangasek, strange. the two latest debian releases aren't in bzr
[00:56] <slangasek> hmm, quite
[00:56] <slangasek> how long ago was -13 uploaded?
[00:59] <Noskcaj> september 2nd
[00:59] <slangasek> hmm
[00:59] <slangasek> can you file a bug against the udd project about this?
[01:00] <Noskcaj> I'm not sure what to do, where, and i haven't checked the package import myself. but i'll try once i've had lunch
[01:42] <xnox> slangasek: Noskcaj: https://launchpad.net/debian/+source/videocut doesn't know about -13 and -14 uploads. So i'd take it up with AA, e.g. cjwatson can check via videocut didn't sync.
[01:42] <xnox> and udd, only takes stuff that launchpad has imported.
[01:42] <xnox> s/via/why/
[01:43] <Noskcaj> ok, thanks
[06:42] <mitya57> German text in videocut's 02-desktop-keywords.diff looks suspicious to me
[08:09] <Noskcaj> stokachu, Do you plan to merge keepalived? If not, i could do it
[08:09] <Noskcaj> (i think)
[08:49] <Noskcaj> kirkland, roaksoax: I've made some progress on testdrive in debian, some DDs are willing to take a look. Could one of you try and fix up the manpage(s)?
[10:28] <brainwash> so apparently nobody is able to resolve bug 1183580, why not simply distribute a working version of that library if it's not possible to build it properly?
[10:29] <brainwash> reported on 2013-05-23 :/
[10:46] <Ampelbein> brainwash: Because Ubuntu can't just distribute binaries that were built on Debian. It may or may not work currently, but there is no guarantee that it will work in the future.
[10:47] <Ampelbein> brainwash: For starters, this bug should have been reported to the developers of the software
[10:49] <brainwash> Ampelbein: the devs? who would that be?
[10:49] <Ampelbein> brainwash: According to the Homepage: field in debian/control: http://rusxmms.sourceforge.net/
[10:50] <brainwash> but there is nothing wrong with the debian package
[10:50] <Ampelbein> brainwash: The build environment in Ubuntu is different from Debian
[10:51] <Ampelbein> And if I were the developer, I sure would want to know that my software doesn't work when compiled in Ubunut.
[10:52] <brainwash> some might say it's ubuntu's fault
[10:52] <brainwash> and not care about this
[10:52] <Ampelbein> They are free to say what they want.
[10:54] <Ampelbein> If the developers are saying that they don't care, Ubuntu would be better off removing the software from the repository.
[10:54] <brainwash> the package maintainer should make sure that the package isn't broken
[10:56] <Ampelbein> Yes, but apparently no-one from MOTU/Ubuntu-Dev uses this particular software.
[10:56] <Ampelbein> So there isn't really a package maintainer in Ubuntu.
[10:57] <Ampelbein> I'm not disputing the fact that there is a bug in the package, btw. I'm just saying that it would help to notify the developers of this bug so they can possibly provide a fix.
[10:58] <brainwash> right, first we would need to test the latest upstream release I assume
[10:58] <Ampelbein> Comment 12 indicates that the new upstream fixes the problem
[11:00] <brainwash> maybe someone could build a new package, so we can test it in trusty and backport then
[11:05] <Ampelbein> let me try
[11:11] <brainwash> Ampelbein: thanks :)
[11:26] <Ampelbein> brainwash: I think I've identified the patch fixing the problem: http://paste.ubuntu.com/6431321/
[11:27] <Ampelbein> brainwash: I'll upload a package to my ppa, would you be available to test the resulting package?
[11:32] <brainwash> Ampelbein: sure
[11:34] <Ampelbein> brainwash: https://launchpad.net/~amoog/+archive/ppa will have saucy and trusty packages in about an hour (according to the build start estimate)
[11:37] <brainwash> Ampelbein: alright
[12:41] <brainwash> Ampelbein: your package does fix the segfault (trusty), good work :)
[20:22] <brainwash> Ampelbein: do you plan to write the SRU request for bug 1183580?
[20:23] <Ampelbein> brainwash: It's on my agenda
[20:23] <brainwash> Ampelbein: ok, thanks :)
[20:23] <Ampelbein> But if you want to do it, I'm not stopping you ;)
[20:23] <Ampelbein> Note however that the package first needs to get sponsored in trusty
[20:23] <brainwash> haven't done something like this yet, so I don't want to mess up
[20:23] <brainwash> right
[21:07] <Noskcaj> Can someone please merge gnome-control-center? the package rygel can be synced one 3.8 is in trusty
[21:20] <TheMuso`> doko: Previous versions of libdotconf didn't have a soname, and the new upstream maintainer fixed it.