[05:45] <Noskcaj> Ampelbein, Do you ever plan to upload the latest version of flatnuke? If not, i could try
[12:57] <Rhonda> Laney (or else), could you be convinced to do a wheezy-backport of ubuntu-dev-tools?
[12:58] <Laney> Rhonda: maybe bdrung or tumbleweed
[12:58] <Rhonda> The backport of devscripts breaks ubuntu-dev-scripts < 147~
[12:58] <Laney> tsk
[12:59] <Rhonda> Hmm, no mention for why in the manpage
[12:59] <Rhonda> Erm, changelog
[12:59] <Laney>  * Move add-patch, edit-patch, suspicious-source, what-patch, and wrap-and-sort from ubuntu-dev-tools into devscripts (Closes: #568481).
[12:59] <Laney> ?
[13:00] <Rhonda> That's too old
[13:00] <Rhonda> That was 2.11.0, and wheezy has 2.12.6
[13:00] <Laney> mmm
[13:00] <Rhonda> So that can't be the reason for the breaks < 147~
[13:01] <bdrung> hm, how does it break?
[13:01] <bdrung> is there a breaks in control?
[13:01] <Rhonda> yes
[13:01] <Rhonda> So devscripts from wheezy-backports currently would uninstall ubuntu-dev-tools
[13:03] <bdrung> ah, now i get it.
[13:03] <bdrung> * Convert Python scripts to python3 (Closes: #680313).
[13:03] <bdrung> ubuntu-dev-tools uses devscripts.logger and needs a Python 2 version of it
[13:03] <bdrung> so yes, we need to also backport ubuntu-dev-tools
[13:11] <Rhonda> That could have been more explicit in the changelog. :/
[13:15] <bdrung> Rhonda: the changelog of ubuntu-dev-scripts 0.147 is an indicator
[13:15] <bdrung> but you are right
[14:20] <Laney> bdrung: are you backporting it?
[15:28] <bdrung> Laney: i could, but feel free to do it
[15:29] <Laney> rather not :P
[15:30] <mfisch> dholbach: ping
[15:31] <dholbach> mfisch, in uds hangouts - how can I help?
[15:31] <mfisch> dholbach: yeah sorry, I'll email you later
[15:31] <dholbach> no worries
[19:09] <jtaylor> mh sweet ext4 data=writeback,commit=3600,nobarrier turns cowbuilder on disk almost into cowbuilder on ramdisk :D