[01:11] StevenK: https://code.launchpad.net/~wgrant/launchpad/antibfjo-1-set/+merge/195886 https://code.launchpad.net/~wgrant/launchpad/antibfjo-2-garbo/+merge/195887 https://code.launchpad.net/~wgrant/launchpad/antibfjo-2.5-no-garbo/+merge/195888 [01:12] wgrant: I'm just about to head off for ~15, I'll cast my eyes over them when I return. [01:12] kk [01:51] wgrant: I'm not sure whether to ostracise or congratulate you for use of a local variable 'bbq' [01:52] lol [01:53] wgrant: r=me * 3, -1-set has a comment [02:06] StevenK: Thanks [02:06] That comment isn't actually mine; it's copied from the Job.status equivalent. But it means "this %s is going to be replaced with self.id" [02:28] StevenK: https://code.launchpad.net/~wgrant/launchpad/antibfjo-3-branch-deletion/+merge/195890 https://code.launchpad.net/~wgrant/launchpad/antibfjo-4-use/+merge/195891 https://code.launchpad.net/~wgrant/launchpad/antibfjo-5-use-more/+merge/195892 [02:38] And https://code.launchpad.net/~wgrant/launchpad/antibfjo-7-no-set-pls/+merge/195894 [02:54] wgrant: What about asserting that the TTB no longer exists after the destroySelf() call? [02:55] StevenK: The FK proves that it's gone. [03:16] wgrant: In -4-use, you remove SPRB.buildqueue_record, but then use it? [03:19] StevenK: I pushed it up to BuildFarmJobMixin [03:19] As it's now common [03:19] Ah, right. [03:20] wgrant: -3-branch-deletion and -4-use are approved, moving onto -5-use-more [03:20] I guess -6-blah is a DB patch? [03:20] -0, -6, -8, -10 are DB patches [03:20] When does BPJ die a horrible death? [03:21] -10 drops the tables and columns [03:21] Is -10 up yet? [03:21] No. [03:21] Diff against target: 817 lines (+95/-164) 22 files modified [03:21] You are a terrible person. [03:21] Ah [03:21] I split it, but I guess it crept back over [03:23] I have fear that the query changes are in one hunk, and the sqlvalues() changes are in the next hunk [03:26] Argh, -7-no-set is even worse [03:26] Mostly deletions, though [03:27] Right [03:27] job_type will die horribly, too? [03:29] Yes [03:29] But it's still needed in -7 so we know how to look up the BFJO to destroy it. [03:31] That's all of them approved [03:31] One niggle in -6 [03:31] Er, -7 [03:32] I will decline to address it; I feel the unwrapping under the same name at the very start of the method is justified. [03:33] But thanks === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha