| === heathkid|2 is now known as heathkid | ||
| Nothing_Much | Anybody know how to use libhybris on the desktop? | 02:25 |
|---|---|---|
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| === _Lucretia__ is now known as _Lucretia_ | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| === chuck__ is now known as zul | ||
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| === anmar is now known as anmar|afk | ||
| === cmagina is now known as cmagina-lunch | ||
| ogra_ | bug 1237160 | 19:27 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1237160 in initramfs-tools-ubuntu-touch (Ubuntu) "initramfs-tools-ubuntu-touch interferes with update-initramfs on amd64" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1237160 | 19:27 |
| === cmagina-lunch is now known as cmagina | ||
| infinity | ogra_: Looks like it shouldn't be hardcoding those library paths, since I suspect we want that to work on x86 touch devices too, if they existed. | 20:04 |
| infinity | ogra_: (Or, say, x86 images for goldfish) | 20:04 |
| ogra_ | yeah, thats why i'm looking at it | 20:05 |
| ogra_ | it should also have a properly restricted Arch: field | 20:05 |
| ogra_ | we dont want it on amd64 | 20:05 |
| ogra_ | but thats independent from the general bug | 20:05 |
| infinity | ogra_: I see no reason it needs to be artificially arch-restricted. | 20:05 |
| ogra_ | we only want it on armhf and i386 ... and in a year or two on arm64 | 20:06 |
| infinity | ogra_: Only because that's all you have devices for right now. I still see it as an artificial restriction. | 20:06 |
| infinity | Oh, it's already arch-restricted anyway. :P | 20:07 |
| ogra_ | it definitely is an artificial restriction | 20:07 |
| ogra_ | but a wanted one | 20:07 |
| ogra_ | infinity, i dont hardcode any lib paths btw, it just uses copy_exec | 20:09 |
| ogra_ | but it expects armhf | 20:09 |
| infinity | ogra_: You totally hardcode library paths, I'm looking right at it. | 20:09 |
| infinity | hooks/touch:copy_exec /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 | 20:09 |
| ogra_ | oh ? | 20:09 |
| ogra_ | oh ! | 20:09 |
| ogra_ | ok | 20:09 |
| infinity | ogra_: See plymouth, which does a sed in debian/rules to get DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH into its hooks file. | 20:09 |
| ogra_ | will do | 20:10 |
| ogra_ | btw, did you ever get to make plymouth not pull in the x86 graphics libs ? | 20:10 |
| ogra_ | we'll need that fix soon | 20:10 |
| infinity | Wasn't that fixed ages ago? | 20:11 |
| ogra_ | nope | 20:11 |
| ogra_ | i think that fell off the table | 20:11 |
| ogra_ | and had no importance anymore | 20:12 |
| infinity | Pretty sure you're wrong. | 20:12 |
| ogra_ | (last time i bothered with it was the N7 desktop image... long before the denmark UDS) | 20:12 |
| infinity | http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-core/daily/current/trusty-core-armhf.manifest | 20:12 |
| infinity | ogra_: ^-- plymouth is in there, but no intel/nouveau/radeon stuff. | 20:12 |
| ogra_ | hmm, it definitely wasnt like that nback then | 20:13 |
| ogra_ | but then we ripped plymouth out on the N7 ... so it became a non issue | 20:13 |
| infinity | libdrm2 no longer pulls in the card-specific plugins at all. | 20:13 |
| ogra_ | ok | 20:13 |
| infinity | Which, in effect, leaves you with genric kms. | 20:13 |
| ogra_ | well, plymouth will get a Mir backend ... | 20:14 |
| ogra_ | which should add an abstraction layer | 20:14 |
| === anmar|afk is now known as anmar | ||
| sveinse | Anyone with experience with odroid-xu? | 21:57 |
| sveinse | I'm REALLY looking forward to having a native buildserver with some decent performance | 21:58 |
| sveinse | So question is if I can run 12.04 on it. <-- This all depends on having a kernel which is compatible with precise, I guess | 21:59 |
| infinity | sveinse: Any reasonably modern kernel should do with the precise userspace. | 22:12 |
| sveinse | infinity: Yeah, that is what I thought as well. Esp when 3.11.0 is available on precise | 22:13 |
| sveinse | They support 13.04 Ubuntu AFAIK, so there should be no problems using it on precise as well | 22:14 |
| sveinse | I.e. they have a kernel which works for 13.04 Ubuntu (that is how I read it) | 22:14 |
| sveinse | But there are some ubuntuisms in the kernel, aren't there? Like ureadahead | 22:15 |
| infinity | sveinse: The only interesting Ubuntuism is probably apparmor, but you can live without it. | 22:30 |
| sveinse | infinity: but are there some overview or patchset of all the ubuntuisms? We have a product running on precise on omap3, but the kernel is fully custom so we have no ubntuisms in there. And ureadahead is sorely missed many times | 22:31 |
| infinity | sveinse: Probably a better question for #ubuntu-kernel, but the short answer is "check git". | 22:42 |
| infinity | sveinse: You may also find this informative: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Specs/TrustyKernelDeltaReview | 22:42 |
| sveinse | infinity: heh, thanks | 22:42 |
| sveinse | Does canonical still use tegras for buildds? | 22:57 |
| infinity | sveinse: Canonical never used tegras for buildds. | 23:34 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!