=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-uds-plenary to: Currently no events are active in this room - http://summit.ubuntu.com/uds-1311/plenary/ - http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2013/11/20/%23ubuntu-uds-plenary.html
[00:48]  * t3rnary slaps t3rnary around a bit with a large trout
[01:11] <bjh33> hi
[01:16] <Muwanguzi7> Hi
[04:02]  * Peethu slaps Peethu around a bit with a large trout
[04:02] <cprofitt> Peethu: was it raw or cooked?
[04:02] <Peethu> just checkin in
[04:03] <Peethu> hate 13.10v.. installing 12.1 again
[04:04] <Peethu> cprofit: u thr
[04:05] <cprofitt> I am
[04:06] <cprofitt> Peethu: I am rather fond of 13.10
[04:06] <cprofitt> though I will be migrating my testing box to 14.04 soon
[04:07] <Peethu> i starter in case of ubuntu dev
[04:07] <Peethu> cprofit:
[04:07] <Peethu> did you tried in phone
[04:07] <Peethu> cprofit:
[04:09] <Peethu> seems like u r busy.. back later
[15:01] <balloons> howdy everyone
[15:01] <balloons> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/72cpi5ial81gk1qbofl262k96o?authuser=0&hl=en for anyone who wants to join the hangout
[15:03] <pleia2> balloons: I think you meant that for #ubuntu-uds-community-2
[15:03] <balloons> haha, ty pleia2
[16:04] <lool> mhall119: Heya, we'd need a followup session for the "System framework for apps" discussion (that just happened in Core 1), what's the best way to do this?
[16:04] <mhall119> lool: go to summit.ubuntu.com, propose a meeting using the link on the right
[16:05] <mhall119> if you have room in the Core rooms, put it in the Core track and ask one of those leads to schedule it
[16:05] <mhall119> otherwise put it on the hallway track and ask msm to schedule it
[16:57] <lool> mhall119: filed http://summit.ubuntu.com/uds-1311/meeting/22125/followup-session-for-system-framework-for-apps/ in the appdev track (where it originally was, but it was scheduled in core 1 due to lack of slots I guess); it doesn't really matter if this ends up in the hallway track though
[17:03] <lool> mhall119: (would you mind scheduling it?)
[17:28] <mhall119> lool: do you have a time you'd prefer?
[17:32] <mhall119> lool: or day?
[18:05] <lool> mhall119: no
[18:07] <lool> well, I'd like the lowest number of conflicts  :-)
[18:08] <mhall119> lool: 16:00 UTC tomorrow then
[18:08] <lool> thanks
[18:08] <mhall119> np
[18:09] <lool> ah crap, it's the time of the push notifications followup
[18:09] <lool> well I guess I'll divide my time
[18:19] <lool> (actually I was confused, it's all good)
[18:26] <lool> the apparmor parser also takes time
[18:26] <lool> content hub?  or HUD?
[18:28] <lool> QUESTION: do we need separate chroots for native builds and cross-builds due to multiarch deps still?
[18:29] <lool> I mean if I'm on trusty/amd64 and I want to a) cross-build to saucy/armhf and b) build for saucy/amd64, can I use a single chroot?
[18:30] <lool> ups ECHAN
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
[22:56] <Pieter-Wageninge> Hi