[01:08] <rick_h_> hatch: have the chrome dev summit videos not been put on youtube? I wanted to catch up but :(
[01:12] <hatch> rick_h_: not sure I haven't seen anything yet
[01:13] <rick_h_> hatch: yea, found the 'live stream' day one which is an 8hr video
[12:35] <bac> hi frankban, i qa'd matt's branch and landed it.  i did note some issue but wasn't sure whether they were blockers for the branch.  it moves us forward.
[12:35] <bac> s/issue/issues/
[12:37] <frankban> bac: yes I saw that, thank you! we have cards for setting up ssh keys and the envs.yaml file. Matt's branch is just the first step, so I guess that's ok. time for two reviews?
[12:37] <bac> frankban: sure
[12:38] <frankban> bac: thanks. quick one: https://codereview.appspot.com/30810043. more complex one: https://codereview.appspot.com/30760043
[12:40] <marcoceppi> Good morning everyone o/ I'm curious how the sandbox mode/simulator mode works in the gui. I'd like to leverage portions of it for a personal project (maintaining fake juju status in javascript), is it relatively pluggable or is it highly atuned to the gui?
[12:45] <rick_h_> marcoceppi: hmm, so it'd be big. It kind of work together with the db setup, the JS models. 
[12:45] <rick_h_> marcoceppi: we could probably get a hangout to walk through it sometime. 
[12:45] <marcoceppi> rick_h_: cool
[12:50] <bac> frankban: make check shows incomplete test coverage
[12:50] <bac> frankban: on your first review
[12:50] <frankban> bac: that's fixed by the second branch in review 
[12:50] <bac> frankban: ok
[13:07] <bac> frankban: does quickstart attempt to open the user's default browser or firefox?  my default is chromium (as set in 'System Info') but QS opens FF.
[13:07] <frankban> bac: it uses webbrowser.open, so it should be the default browser, for some definition of "default"
[13:08] <bac> huh
[13:08] <frankban> bac: http://docs.python.org/2/library/webbrowser.html#webbrowser.open
=== gary_poster|away is now known as gary_poster
[13:15] <gary_poster> hi everybody
[13:16] <frankban> morning gary_poster 
[13:16] <gary_poster> :-)
[13:16] <frankban> guihelp: anyone available for another review of https://codereview.appspot.com/30760043 (quickstart)?
[13:17] <gary_poster> I will after mail skim if no one else takes it
[13:17] <bac> frankban: i was just about to do it.  or are you asking for a second?
[13:17] <frankban> bac: I was asking for a second. thank you
[13:17]  * bac continues
[13:17] <frankban> thanks gary_poster 
[13:17] <gary_poster> welcome
[13:25] <rick_h_> I can look frankban 
[13:27] <frankban> rick_h_: cool thanks
[13:27] <frankban> gary_poster: ^^^
[13:27] <gary_poster> ok cool thanks rick_h_ and frankban 
[13:28] <rick_h_> the coffee it brewed and it's friday!
[13:28] <gary_poster> :-) yay
[13:33] <gary_poster> ok email is not exactly tamed, but the wild animals are at least identified
[13:33] <rick_h_> shoot to kill!
[13:34] <gary_poster> heh
[13:42]  * frankban biab
[13:43] <bac> rick_h_: you are doing frankban's review?  i'm starting QA so you can skip that part
[13:44] <rick_h_> bac: yes, thanks
[14:14] <benji> why are there paths that start with "./" all over the charm Makefile?
[14:16] <hatch> save the dots
[14:16] <rick_h_> they look cool!
[14:18] <bac> hatch: ha!
[14:20] <hatch> :D
[14:21] <benji> pfft
[14:22] <hatch> the worst part of tests is fixing them all
[14:27] <frankban> rick_h_: thanks for the review. I'd like charms.py to be replaced (or part of) a future bundles/charms library that the dpeloyer, charmworld and quickstart can share. But for the time being, I'd prefer for quickstart validation to avoid connecting to the network
[14:27] <antdillon> rick_h_, Hey Rick, you about?
[14:27] <rick_h_> frankban: ok, that's kind of what I was thinking as well. Maybe just a bug to mark integration that needs to occur?
[14:27] <bac> rick_h_: i am not going to do frankban's QA step 3 as it will take too long with my connection.  have a go at it if you want.
[14:27] <rick_h_> antdillon: yep
[14:28] <rick_h_> bac: ok, will try to go do that in a minute then. 
[14:28] <antdillon> rick_h_, Do you know if there is more api calls to manage.jujucharms.com/api/3/?
[14:28] <rick_h_> antdillon: http://charmworld.readthedocs.org/en/latest/api.html
[14:28] <antdillon> rick_h_, Awesome thanks
[14:29] <rick_h_> antdillon: regenerating the docs as they've not been updated for a couple of weeks, so maybe refresh in 5
[14:29] <rick_h_> antdillon: let me know if you've got any specific questions/api stuff you're looking for
[14:29] <antdillon> rick_h_, Cool thanks
[14:30] <frankban> rick_h_: sounds good. re changing the name of the check_charm_url utility. sounds good, maybe print_charm_url?
[14:30] <antdillon> rick_h_, Just wanna pull a specific charms details in a call
[14:31] <rick_h_> frankban: yea, I mean maybe that's just me. I didn't have a great alternative. I just was confused for a minute. 
[14:32] <frankban> rick_h_: ok, I'll make the changes, and also add a XXX in charms.py e.g. reuse code (whenever we have reusable code)
[14:32] <bac> frankban: review and most QA done
[14:32] <rick_h_> antdillon: ok, so that's just https://manage.jujucharms.com/api/3/charm/precise/mysql
[14:32] <antdillon> rick_h_, Yep got it, thank man, the docs are col
[14:32] <antdillon> cool*
[14:32] <rick_h_> antdillon: awesome, api ftw
[14:33] <frankban> bac: thanks
[14:35] <rick_h_> bac: so I just need to do #3 to complete qa?
[14:35] <bac> rick_h_: that is correct
[14:40] <rick_h_> frankban: ok, #3 is good, qa is all ok
[14:40] <frankban> rick_h_: great, thank you!
[14:42] <hatch> uuuuuuugh someone else wana fix these tests for me? Free coffee available in your kitchen if you do!
[14:42] <rick_h_> hatch: oh come on, it's an oppertunity. I'll let you take it
[14:42] <rick_h_> you broke it you bought it :P
[14:43] <frankban> rick_h_: how much time is required in your opinion to produce that kind of python charms/bundles validation library? the number of projects that can use that is very high: the guiserver, proof, quickstart, charmworld...
[14:44] <rick_h_> frankban: well most of it's written, so it's a matter of refactoring it out into a library and getting it back into all the tools. Maybe a week if all goes well? 
[14:44] <frankban> juju-deployer...
[14:44] <rick_h_> Maybe that's optimistic
[14:44] <hatch> haha darn, well I tried
[14:44] <rick_h_> to pull the library out is definitely ok in under a week, it's the work to get it into the each of those tools (and there's a few as you note) and some we don't control
[14:45] <rick_h_> frankban: but yea, I think we all want to see this happen. The proof stuff, validation, etc. It's a hefy chunk we keep replicating. 
[14:45] <rick_h_> and if those rules change it's going to suck for us
[14:46] <frankban> rick_h_: yeah, maybe two weeks/one developer. yes, I don;t expect charms to change so often, but bundles definitely can
[14:47] <rick_h_> frankban: yea, but validation can get better. And with two stable releases coming I figure there will be some shake up. I'm not sure what that will end up being yet though. 
[14:47] <rick_h_> I'm still curious if charms will be like py3. People try to write a charm that just works on each LTS and submit it to both paths, or do two different charms and sync changes when required. 
[14:49] <frankban> rick_h_: describe_gui_charm_url... how does it sound?
[14:51] <rick_h_> frankban: hmmm, I think check is ok now that I look at it more. Sorry. I mean it's printing, some validation, and logging. I guess if I had hit the utils.py file first maybe it wouldn't have seemed so out of place
[14:52] <frankban> rick_h_: from the charm author perspective, I don't think precise and trusty have too many differences (compared to py2/py3). E.g. we need to port the gui charm, and I guess we won't require a second code base for that
[14:52] <frankban> rick_h_: great, I'll leave check
[15:10] <hatch> bac: if you wouldn't mind, could you fire open Safari and let me know what version you have?
[15:11] <bac> hatch: that's a very personal question.  the answer of which is Version 7.0 (9537.71)
[15:11] <bac> (i think that is a Star Date)
[15:11] <hatch> thanks for opening up to me, Starfleet thanks you
[15:12] <bac> anything else?  shoe size? bagel topping preference?
[15:14] <frankban> :-)
[15:15] <hatch> lol nope that's it, I just needed to know what the most recent safari was on mavericks
[15:15] <hatch> I don't have mavericks installed yet
[15:17] <bac> frankban: are you going to get to bug 1252295 today?  if not i'd like to take it.
[15:17] <_mup_> Bug #1252295: guiserver bundle deployment error is empty <juju-gui (Juju Charms Collection):Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1252295>
[15:19] <frankban> bac: the guiserver part of that bug is fixed: we now return something like "no further details available". I think hazmat is working on the deployer part (prevent the deployer to return exceptions without messages)
[15:20] <bac> frankban: ah, ok.
[15:23] <frankban> bac: FWIW, bug 1251420 could be interesting
[15:23] <_mup_> Bug #1251420: reporting an error from the environment isn't formatted well <juju-gui (Juju Charms Collection):Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1251420>
[15:50] <gary_poster> jujugui call in 10
[15:58] <gary_poster> jujugui call in 2
[16:00] <gary_poster> hatch, yo yo yo
[16:35] <marcoceppi> gary_poster: got a few mins for a g+?
[16:36] <gary_poster> marcoceppi, on call will ping
[16:36] <marcoceppi> gary_poster: ack, thanks!
[17:08] <frankban> benji: still lbox problems?
[17:09] <benji> frankban: yep: "error: Failed to run "bzr push": exit status 3"
[17:09] <benji> frankban: this is the right branch for the charm trunk, correct? bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~juju-gui/charms/precise/juju-gui/trunk/
[17:10] <frankban> benji: yes
[17:11] <frankban> benji: is this lbox propose? anything useful from -debug?
[17:11] <benji> yep, "lbox propose"; I'll do a -debug run now
[17:12] <benji> 2013/11/22 11:11:44 Branch URL inferred: lp:~benji/charms/use-known-pip
[17:12] <benji> that doesn't look right
[17:12] <benji> oh: bzr: ERROR: Permission denied: "~benji/charms/use-known-pip/": : Project 'charms' does not exist.
[17:14] <frankban> benji: yes so lbox pushes the branch for you, and that's not the right location. 
[17:15] <benji> frankban: any hints as to a good location?
[17:16] <frankban> benji: I use this entries in my ~/.bazaar/locations.conf: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/6459507/  you can adjust them for your needs
[17:17] <benji> frankban: ah! thanks; I bet I lost a similar entry in my bzr decimation 
[17:19] <frankban> benji: I guess lbox infers the location only if not set, so a quick fix could also be a push --remember, but the location file is a cool thing (I really hope git will have something similar) and automates things 
[17:19] <benji> yep, it is nice
[17:20] <benji> grrr, lbox, it is OK if the first line of a commit message is over 50 characters!
[17:21] <benji> it's like someone created an evil AI that loves haiku
[17:21] <frankban> :-)
[17:33] <benji> frankban: do you have time to look at the fruit of my lbox, er labor?  https://codereview.appspot.com/31000043/
[17:33] <frankban> benji: sure
[17:40] <gary_poster> marcoceppi, hey.  ready.  you have a hangout or do you want me to make one?
[17:40] <marcoceppi> in a meeting gary_poster, will ping when I'm avail again :)
[17:40] <hatch> jcastro: can you take a look at my ghost charm and let me know if there is anything I need to do to get it approved? Or should I just push it to my name and then we can 'upgrade' it at that point?
[17:40] <gary_poster> marcoceppi, :-) k
[17:42] <hatch> so...many....tabs
[17:45] <marcoceppi> gary_poster: okay! https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/76cpj7q9igbirg4g5ov1ifeups?hl=en
[17:45] <jcastro> hatch, push it to your name, then file a bug against charms asking something like "I am ready for review!" and then assign the ~charmers team to the bug
[17:45] <jcastro> that'll put you in the queue
[17:47] <hatch> jcastro: ok cool, so should I blog about it once it's up or wait for charmers?
[17:47] <jcastro> I prefer to wait for charmers because the namespace is cleaner rather than ~jorge/blah
[17:47] <jcastro> but up to you
[17:48] <jcastro> it it works might as well blog it, post it on their forum
[17:48] <jcastro> and say something like "as soon as I pass peer review it'll just be `juju deploy ghost`, but in the meantime, GO DEPLOY THE WORLD." or something
[17:48] <hatch> haha
[17:49] <rick_h_> hatch: there was a guy at CHC working with ghost and I mentioned your charm in the wings
[17:49] <rick_h_> hatch: kind of cool, he's a ghost fan
[17:50] <hatch> jcastro: ok cool I'll make sure it proofs perfect this weekend and create a bug for it so that the review can be quick
[17:50] <hatch> rick_h_: oh cool - I would like some other users input into what additional features I should add
[18:09] <gary_poster> jujugui, charm review request #1 of in-progress effort: https://codereview.appspot.com/31020043
[18:12] <frankban> gary_poster: taking a look
[18:12] <gary_poster> thanks frankban 
[18:17] <gary_poster> this is a follow-on to the branch frankban is reviewing, but I won't ask for a review until the first one is done: https://codereview.appspot.com/30980044 .  In retrospect, maybe I shouldn't have made the review request.
[18:17] <gary_poster> I mean, in rietveld
[18:19] <bac> hey rick_h_ you know a particular bundle that induces the error we discussed?
[18:19] <rick_h_> bac: hmm, I think it was fixed. It was due to a bundle have constraints defined as cpu-cores=''
[18:19] <rick_h_> so the '' blew it up
[18:20] <rick_h_> since it needed to be an int 
[18:20] <bac> rick_h_: ok, cool, i'll sabotage one of mine
[18:30] <frankban> jujugui, jcastro: new alpha version (0.4.2) of juju quickstart released in the quickstart beta ppa. It includes: support for setting up juju-core packages, local provider support, ability to reuse an existing environment/juju-gui, incrementing bundle deployments count, customized gui charm url validation.
[18:30] <rick_h_> frankban: woot! I was just looking to use the lxc support this morning
[18:30] <gary_poster> awesome!  thanks frankban 
[18:31] <hazmat> frankban, nice
[18:32] <bac> in case anyone else needs it: sudo add-apt-repository ppa:juju-gui/quickstart-beta
[18:32] <gary_poster> I'll copy it over to juju/stable
[18:32] <frankban> thanks bac 
[18:39] <jcastro> hey frankban
[18:39] <jcastro> are you going to announce on the list? 
[18:39] <jcastro> I am working on the quickstart /bundle docs this afternoon
[18:39] <jcastro> and was going to announce them too
[18:40] <frankban> jcastro: EOD for me, could you please give it a try and include it in your announcement? 
[18:40] <benji> frankban: thanks for the review
[18:40] <frankban> benji: welcome
[18:40] <jcastro> ok!
[18:40] <frankban> thanks jcastro 
[18:51]  * gary_poster intends to take a late lunch and then realizes he has worked all the way through to next meeting.  Happens more often than it should.  :-/
[18:51] <jcastro> gary_poster, yeah I do that sometimes, sucks.
[18:51] <jcastro> (I am eating lunch now and it's 2 oclock, heh)
[18:51] <gary_poster> :-)
[18:52] <gary_poster> yeah I may need to do that in next mtg. :-) ...stepping away to kitchen briefly...
[19:05] <frankban> gary_poster: review done, thank you and have a nice weekend all
[19:06] <gary_poster> thanks frankban!
[19:06] <gary_poster> have a great weekend
[19:24] <hatch> crazy that anandtech still doesn't have a new rMBP 15" review
[19:27] <hatch> 188 unread blogposts....who wants to help me read?
[19:29] <hatch> I'm not sure if anyone else is a Digital Blasphemy member but this one is just awesome http://digitalblasphemy.com/preview.shtml?i=traveller2k131
[19:44] <hatch> ok down to 157, and done fooding
[19:47] <jcastro> oh dang, forgot to ask frankban
[19:47] <jcastro> gary_poster, is the new release of quickstart in your PPA something we should copy over to the juju PPA?
[19:48] <gary_poster> jcastro, already done.  
[19:48] <jcastro> oh well, that covers that!
[19:48] <gary_poster> :-)
[20:02] <bac> has anyone installed the juju-quickstart from the new beta ppa?  the package says 0.4.2 but --version say 0.4.0
[20:02] <bac> s/say/says/
[20:02] <bac> s/say/says/
[20:03] <bac> s/n say/n says/
[20:03] <bac> s/saysss/says/
[20:09] <bac> gary_poster: ^^
[20:10] <gary_poster> bac, I have not.  and lol at the IRC substitutions.  doesn't sound too bad.  Maybe shoot a note to peeps and frankban about it?
[20:11] <gary_poster> I bet it is a release checklist thing
[20:11] <bac> gary_poster: well, i know he updated the version file in his latest branch.  so i fear the PPA just didn't get everything he expected.
[20:12] <gary_poster> bac, oh. :-/
[20:12] <gary_poster> bac, you feel like kicking the machinery, or shall I investigate?
[20:12] <bac> in fact it probably doesn't have my deployment counter b/c i know i set it at 0.4.1
[20:12] <gary_poster> :-(
[20:12] <gary_poster> 0.4.2-1
[20:12] <gary_poster> ?
[20:12] <bac> gary_poster: i'll go poke at it.
[20:12] <gary_poster> thank you
[20:18] <bac> gary_poster: false alarm.  i had an old qs install in my /usr/local/lib
[20:18] <bac> PPA is a-ok
[20:19] <gary_poster> bac, oh, great
[20:19] <gary_poster> thank you for investigating, bac
[20:20] <hatch> man I love it when tests fail but the real world works just fine
[20:20] <hatch> it just brightens up my day!
[20:21] <gary_poster> ;-)
[20:21] <rick_h_> trade you, you can hack this up in shell and ruby together and intertwined :)
[20:22] <gary_poster> heh, I wondered about that when I skimmed the code. heh and :-/
[20:23] <hatch> RUby? You're implementing our CI in RUBY?
[20:23]  * hatch storms away
[20:23] <hatch> :P
[20:23] <rick_h_> yea, and there's a long running fork that's submitted 6 pull requests with no merges back in. So now I've forked the fork and updating it to work wheee
[20:23] <rick_h_> hatch: :)
[20:23] <rick_h_> why not, it's one of the few lang's I don't have in my github profile
[20:23] <rick_h_> COMPLETED
[20:23] <hatch> lol
[20:24] <hatch> Github thinks I have Ruby in my Ghost charm, does that count?
[20:24] <rick_h_> hah
[20:25] <rick_h_> and curses for comments not being part of JSON so this whole config file has not one comment on wtf a 'repo_to_pull_id_param' is
[20:25] <hatch> there are really no other options?
[20:25] <rick_h_> write one
[20:26] <hatch> I actually have no idea what your doing....so SURE, it shouldn't take that long
[20:26] <rick_h_> lol
[20:26] <gary_poster> yeah.  that was my worst case for this :-/
[20:27] <rick_h_> github has an api right? and there's only 7 python libraries that claim to work with it. 
[20:27] <gary_poster> heh
[20:27] <hatch> well there are always node ones too :)
[20:27] <rick_h_> yea, because I've got 99 problems but npm not working aint one
[20:27] <hatch> lol
[20:28]  * gary_poster laughs/cries
[20:28] <rick_h_> I'd keep quite on the node for a while. I've been burned three times lately and I'm a bit cranky
[20:28] <hatch> hey that's the package managers fault
[20:28] <hatch> they should use juju
[20:28] <rick_h_> and what package did you want me to use? :P
[20:29] <hatch> actually if it makes you feel any better, if npm is down we can't install the GUI anyways
[20:29] <hatch> so really, it's like an early failure system
[20:29] <rick_h_> "node and npm, node and npm, go together like a fish and water ...you can't have one without the other" 
[20:29] <gary_poster> can too
[20:29] <gary_poster> from charm/packaged bits
[20:29] <rick_h_> yea, as long as it's the current release
[20:29] <rick_h_> trigger config-changed and you're done for
[20:29] <hatch> shh I'm trying to make a point here
[20:30] <hatch> there is no room for logic here
[20:30] <gary_poster> lol
[20:30] <rick_h_> sorry, forgot it's not the canadian way
[20:30] <rick_h_> :P
[20:30] <rick_h_> I think it gets too cold for logic up there
[20:30] <hatch> and it's not even "cold" yet
[20:30] <hatch> only -20
[20:30] <gary_poster> uh-oh, the Michigan attacks Canada
[20:31] <rick_h_> oh come on, you know that canada is the 51st state, we've just not bothered to claim it yet. 
[20:32] <gary_poster> ooh, ruby has made rick aaaaangry!
[20:33] <hatch> we aren't worried, you couldn't the handle universal health care and a stable banking system - many would go crazy
[20:33] <gary_poster> lol.  there we go, fight! fight! fight!
[20:33] <hatch> hahaha
[20:33] <rick_h_> don't make me pull out my trump card
[20:33] <rick_h_> now's not a good time...I'll go all Mayor on you
[20:34] <gary_poster> yeah, low blow, I dunno
[20:34] <rick_h_> things must just run themselves because that mayor isn't running much...
[20:34] <gary_poster> :-)
[20:34] <hatch> You're a little to close to Detroit to be bringing things down to the city management level
[20:34] <hatch> :D
[20:34] <gary_poster> lol
[20:35] <rick_h_> hey, we've got the auto industry to blame. That mayor is all on the voters 
[20:35] <hatch> have you ever been to Toronto? Everyone there likes to party
[20:35] <hatch> lol
[20:35] <rick_h_> there we go, canada could be our second most populated state
[20:36] <rick_h_> http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=population+of+canada+vs+population+of+california+vs+population+of+texas
[20:36] <hatch> and the only one not in the red?
[20:36] <hatch> lol
[20:36] <gary_poster> Texas is red a different way
[20:37] <hatch> haha oh right
[20:38] <rick_h_> well, I got the script to run once manually from the cli on the jenkins server. Going to call success and run away. 
[20:38] <gary_poster> heh
[20:38] <gary_poster> have a great weekend rick_h_ 
[20:39] <rick_h_> you guys as well!
[20:39] <hatch> haha
[20:39] <hatch> have a good one
[20:39] <rick_h_> even candadians
[20:39] <hatch> cya
[20:40] <hatch> I think I managed to break every inspector overview test...
[20:40] <hatch> that must be some kind of record
[20:41] <gary_poster> heh
[20:45] <hatch> rick_h_: oh hey if you pop back, get your buddy there to file any feature requests on the ghost gh repo if he has any
[21:12] <bac> gentlemens i bid you adieu and anon.
[21:13] <gary_poster> bye bac.  have a great weekend
[21:13] <bac> will do
[21:17] <hatch> cya bac
[22:27] <gary_poster> have a great weekend all
=== gary_poster is now known as gary_poster|away
[22:28] <hatch> you too gary_poster|away cya
[22:44]  * hatch last person in the office *turns the tunes way up*
[23:19] <hatch> jujugui if anyone feels like they want to do a deep and detailed qa this weekend https://codereview.appspot.com/31190043/ :)