[00:32] <Noskcaj> Do we follow the CoC for copyright files? http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/trusty/hexdiff/trusty/view/head:/debian/copyright
[00:34] <slangasek> the code of conduct applies to everything we do while acting as representatives of the Ubuntu community; but I'm assuming you're referring to the choice of language in that copyright file, which we have no control over, because those are the actual terms of the license
[00:34] <slangasek> (it's childish, but that doesn't change that this is the license... and that's not the only package in the archive under that license)
=== GridCube_ is now known as GridCube
=== TheDrums is now known as DalekSec
=== doko_ is now known as doko
=== freeflying_away is now known as freeflying
=== freeflying is now known as freeflying_away
=== freeflying_away is now known as freeflying
=== Riussi_ is now known as Riussi
[11:03] <ari-tczew> if a package got in d/control in Architecture something like "mips mipsel s390x", do we need to remove them or can be there?
[11:27] <shadeslayer> cjwatson: I think ARCH isn't considered with the script-rootfs
[11:27] <shadeslayer> erm
[11:27] <shadeslayer> live-rootfs I mean
[11:34] <ogra_> shadeslayer, because it is ARCHES iirc
[11:35] <shadeslayer> 0.o
[11:35] <shadeslayer> auto/config has no thing as ARCHES
[11:35] <shadeslayer> only ARCH
[11:37] <ogra_> oh, right
[11:37] <ogra_> how do you hand ot to the build command ?
[11:37] <ogra_> (should be a prefix)
[11:40] <shadeslayer> hm? I don't follow ...
[11:40] <shadeslayer> I added --architectures i386 to the lb config command in auto/config
[11:41] <ogra_> no, you need to set ARCH="foo" in the line of the build command
[11:41] <shadeslayer> I did
[11:41] <ogra_> hmm, works fine for me ...
[11:41] <shadeslayer> http://pastebin.kde.org/pmaktsria
[11:41] <shadeslayer> this is on 14.04
[11:44] <ogra_> try exporting it instead
[11:44] <ogra_> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2011-June/033458.html
[11:46] <shadeslayer> ogra_: I did tryhat too t
[11:46] <shadeslayer> *I did try that too
[11:47] <shadeslayer> http://pastebin.kde.org/pd2bgu85z
[11:47] <shadeslayer> ogra_: ^^
[12:06] <arun> guys ; is there APIs  site of Ubuntu ?
[12:16] <shadeslayer> arun: developer.ubuntu.com
[12:16] <infinity> shadeslayer: Run it under linux32, that's what the buildds do.
[12:17] <shadeslayer> infinity: yeah, but then this should be doable should it not?
[12:17] <infinity> Perhaps ARCH should also set --architecture, sure.  I'm just telling you how it works right now.
[12:18] <infinity> (And you want to be running under linux32 anyway, to avoid the possibility of something misbehaving when it sees an x86_64 uname)
[12:19] <shadeslayer> roger
[12:19] <shadeslayer> infinity: other problem, when booting the x86_64 image, it says can't find /casper/vmlinuz
[12:20] <infinity> That, I'm less sure about.  We don't actually use live-build to build ISOs, so your results will be a bit different from the "official" builds.  Patches welcome to bring them more in line.
[12:21] <shadeslayer> googling that issue gives me a number of hits where people said it's /casper/vmlinuz.efi
[12:21] <infinity> doko: Which toolchain-r PPA do you want me to copy this glibc upload to?
[12:22] <doko> ubuntu-toolchain-r/test
[12:22] <infinity> Done.
=== lilstevie is now known as lilstevie-tmp
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC
=== freeflying is now known as freeflying_away
=== freeflying_away is now known as freeflying
=== freeflying is now known as freeflying_away
=== freeflying_away is now known as freeflying
=== freeflying is now known as freeflying_away
[15:15] <maxiaojun> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unzip/+bug/1199239
[15:15] <ubottu> Ubuntu bug 1199239 in unzip (Ubuntu Raring) "[SRU] unzip list utf-8 (non-ascii) filenames as ??" [High,Fix committed]
[15:16] <maxiaojun> why it stuck for quantal and raring?
=== rainbowdash` is now known as Mapley
=== Mapley is now known as rainbowdash`
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
[18:35] <shadeslayer> would anyone know why livecd-rootfs doesn't symlink binary/casper/vmlinuz-3.11.0-13-generic to binary/casper/vmlinuz?
[18:35] <shadeslayer> since syslinux looks for binary/casper/vmlinuz
=== jono is now known as Guest99054
[21:28] <Ampelbein> jamespage: Since you merged bsh, could you have a look at bug 1254335 ? It causes multiple build failures in Ubuntu.
[21:29] <ubottu> bug 1254335 in bsh (Ubuntu) "bsh: Builds libbsh-java package without needed maven-repo files" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1254335
[21:30] <Ampelbein> jamespage: The bug is fixed in Debian's -15 revision
[22:47] <shadeslayer> cjwatson: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/1254344 when you have some time :)
[22:47] <ubottu> Ubuntu bug 1254344 in livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu) "Syslinux for kernel + initrd that are not present" [Undecided,New]
[22:48] <Noskcaj> Is anyone here a DD? If so, can you please review http://mentors.debian.net/package/testdrive
=== Guest66951 is now known as Mapley
[23:36] <directhex> Noskcaj, debian/control says Depends: debhelper (>=9), but debian/compat says 6
[23:36] <Noskcaj> directhex, really? crap
[23:37] <directhex> Noskcaj, debian/changelog says UNRELEASED, not a real debian version to target (i.e. unstable or experimental when closing an ITP)
[23:38] <directhex> Noskcaj, those are the two which leap out at me. am on windows right now so hard to test
[23:38] <Noskcaj> I've fixed them both, will upload now
[23:58] <Noskcaj> Can someone please rebuild kreversi and krfb on armhf? The chroot failed