[05:24] <rsalveti> hey, seems ubuntu-ui-toolkit is published at launchpad but rmadison is not finding it (and it was migrated from proposed more than one hour ago)
[05:25] <Mirv> the ui-toolkit does not show here in queuebot either btw
[05:26] <rsalveti> seems the new version just disappeared
[05:26] <Mirv> the binaries are there too http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/u/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/
[05:27] <rsalveti> Mirv: seems it was finally migrated
[05:27] <Mirv> rsalveti: wow, now...
[05:27] <rsalveti> weird, took quite a while
[05:27] <Mirv> eh, interesting
=== doko_ is now known as doko
[09:29] <cjwatson> rsalveti,Mirv: I don't know what was up there; it was pushed to mirrors just before 04:11 UTC (which is a reasonable/expected delay from the publication record flipping to Published state); nothing out of the ordinary that I can see in archive-reports mail
[09:29] <cjwatson> (which is the bit that syncs things to snakefruit for things like rmadison)
[09:43] <Mirv> ok
[10:04] <Mirv> could someone kick rebuild on arm64 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upstart-app-launch/0.3+14.04.20131126-0ubuntu1 now that dbus-test-runner is in proposed as well?
[10:05] <Mirv> there's also an autopkgtest failure but it's related to autopkgtest itself and pitti will rerun the test soon enough now that the 2.5.1 was uploaded
[10:05] <Laney> done, but depwaits like that will get cleared automatically
[10:08] <Mirv> thanks. if it's not a heavy poll, maybe the delay could be closer to the amount of wait when waiting for eg. publisher run.
[10:43] <didrocks> cjwatson, Laney: sorry for my ignorance, but I'm unsure how to read that in http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_output.txt
[10:43] <didrocks> trying: upstart-app-launch
[10:43] <didrocks> accepted: upstart-app-launch
[10:43] <didrocks> […]
[10:43] <didrocks> then, I guess it's autopkgtests result
[10:44] <cjwatson> well that means it's been accepted ...
[10:44] <cjwatson> I don't understand the question
[10:44] <didrocks> cjwatson: oh, there is no "apparently successful"
[10:44] <Laney> autopkgtest is another package which got accepted
[10:44] <cjwatson> yes there is
[10:44] <cjwatson> Apparently successful
[10:44] <cjwatson> final: autopkgtest,upstart-app-launch
[10:44] <didrocks> yeah, this is way lower
[10:44] <cjwatson> yes, as usual
[10:45] <didrocks> hum, never noticed it was in 2 pass
[10:45] <cjwatson> AFAICS there's nothing out of the ordinary here
[10:45] <didrocks> so, the "Apparently successful" is for "final: " which is following it?
[10:45] <cjwatson> yes
[10:46] <cjwatson> there's a branch pending review to clarify the whitespace
[10:46] <didrocks> oh, learnt something today, I was obviously misreading it for month :)
[10:46] <didrocks> thanks cjwatson
=== Guest46324 is now known as med_
=== med_ is now known as medberry
=== ara is now known as Guest1754
=== ara_ is now known as ara
=== ara is now known as Guest55288
=== Guest55288 is now known as ara_
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
=== ara_ is now known as ara
[19:16]  * stgraber does an SRU run
=== thomi_ is now known as thomi
=== medberry is now known as med_