[04:39] <chandankumar> hello
[04:40] <chandankumar> I am not able to login through wiki.openstack.org through launchpad-id.
[04:40] <chandankumar> it is telling that the following username is not found.
[04:40] <chandankumar> what will i do now?
[06:08] <wgrant> chandankumar: Which username did you try?
[06:08] <chandankumar> wgrant, chandankumar.093047
[06:09] <wgrant> chandankumar: Where did you enter the username, and which URL gives you the error?
[06:10] <wgrant> The OpenStack wiki's OpenID integration should not ask for a username in a normal situation.
[06:11] <chandankumar> wgrant, https://wiki.openstack.org/w/index.php?title=Special:UserLogin&action=submitlogin&type=login&returnto=Main+Page&returntoquery=welcome%3Dyes
[06:11] <chandankumar> wgrant, There is no user by the name "Chandankumar.093047". Usernames are case sensitive. Check your spelling, or create a new account.
[06:12] <chandankumar> wgrant, i have tried it by changing all the cases, but not able to login
[06:12] <wgrant> chandankumar: That sounds like an error from OpenStack's wiki, not from Launchpad or Ubuntu's OpenID service. You'll need to talk to OpenStack people about that.
[06:12] <chandankumar> wgrant, ok
[06:12] <chandankumar> wgrant, Thanks
[09:39]  * mpt just went to reply to a misguided bug comment, only to find that its author had already hidden the comment themselves ♥
[09:41] <wgrant> :)
[11:40] <seb128> hey
[11:40] <seb128> how does one see who is admin for a project? (e.g can edit its details)
[11:40] <seb128> e.g https://launchpad.net/shotwell
[11:40] <seb128> is that the Maintainer?
[11:41] <cjwatson> Yep
[11:41] <seb128> cjwatson, thanks
[11:41] <cjwatson> Drivers can do some things as well, though I see that project doesn't have any
[11:41] <seb128> seems like Jim doesn't know he's admin for that project
[11:42] <cjwatson> I can check specific permissions for specific things if you need it
[11:42] <seb128> cjwatson, context is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/1254923/comments/2
[11:43] <seb128> cjwatson, they also want to claim ownership for some of their projects, I guess https://launchpad.net/~registry is still the right place (I had that in my old notes)
[11:43] <seb128> well, the "file a request on answers"
[11:44] <wgrant> For a git URL change we can just alter the existing branch.
[11:44] <wgrant> Since it seems the repository has just moved.
[11:44] <cjwatson> Jim should have a pencil icon next to his name on https://launchpad.net/shotwell that he can use to reassign it to a team if he wants.
[11:45] <seb128> cjwatson, thanks
[11:46] <seb128> wgrant, that would be nice, indeed they migrated to https://git.gnome.org/browse/shotwell/log/
[11:46] <seb128> well git://git.gnome.org/shotwell
[11:46] <seb128> rather
[11:52] <wgrant> seb128: Done, and the branch has reimported.
[12:25] <seb128> wgrant, excellent, thanks!
[12:35] <mattymo> I'm having issues finding a doc on this, but how can I configure who can approve blueprints for my project on LP?
[12:39] <cjwatson> mattymo: The definition status of a blueprint can be changed by (a) Launchpad admins (b) the maintainer of the blueprint's target/goal (c) a driver of the blueprint's target/goal (d) the owner, drafter, assignee, or approver of the blueprint.
[12:40] <cjwatson> mattymo: The usual way to configure this is to set a team as your project's "driver" and then add people to that team.
[12:42] <mattymo> I believe I understand and follow you
[12:42] <mattymo> cjwatson, all the fields can be changed though, including status can be marked complete without the approver actually approving, it seems
[12:45] <cjwatson> The exact order of the approval workflow isn't enforced, no
[12:46] <cjwatson> In practice in Ubuntu we've normally found that it's better to let developers clean up themselves without needing to go and get a manager to sign off ...
[13:10] <mattymo> cjwatson, informal workflow process - got it. I understand the benefits
[14:08] <qengho> I wish to have a PPA that I can use for testing, and be able to give to the security team to copy files out of for their pocket. I think I need some special attributes set, but I don't know which ones. I need help.
[14:08] <qengho> I think the builders for ARMHF and such have to be non-virt, or native.
[14:11] <cjwatson> The PPA must be devirtualised
[14:11] <cjwatson> (For all architectures, not that you get a choice)
[14:14] <qengho> I filed this https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/239046 already.
[14:15] <cjwatson> Right, you'll need a webop to do that for you.
[14:15] <cjwatson> Ask on #webops internal.
[14:15] <qengho> Ah, thanks, cjw.
[14:16] <cjwatson> There shouldn't be any other relevant requirements.
[15:46] <shadeslayer> cjwatson: are there plans to whitelist arm64 from britney so that packages can transition to -release even if arm64 isn't built?
[15:46] <shadeslayer> or do I just ask it to be forced
[15:49] <dobey> shadeslayer: questions about ubuntu-specific stuff are probably better suited to being asked in #ubuntu-devel or #ubuntu-release
[15:49] <shadeslayer> okay
[15:49] <dobey> shadeslayer: and that sounds like maybe a release team decision
[15:49] <shadeslayer> *nod*
[17:15] <czajkowski> jamespage: https://twitter.com/czajkowski/status/405743351087235072
[17:18] <mgz> czajkowski: irc linking a twitter link to a web link is pretty funny :)
[17:21] <czajkowski> mgz: well yes but as it was the easiest
[17:21] <mgz> :)O
[17:21] <czajkowski> mgz: also howdy :D
[17:21] <czajkowski> how've you been
[17:21] <mgz> good, though winter is rubbish. and you?
[17:22] <czajkowski> good thanks, just got a puppy and working away.
[17:22] <czajkowski> heading to Barcelona this weekend for work and then countdown for Christmas!
[17:24] <mgz> ha, bet spain is a little warmer, lucky you
[17:24] <czajkowski> 3 days and working as long as I ge ta nice dinner I won't mind