[04:39] hello [04:40] I am not able to login through wiki.openstack.org through launchpad-id. [04:40] it is telling that the following username is not found. [04:40] what will i do now? [06:08] chandankumar: Which username did you try? [06:08] wgrant, chandankumar.093047 [06:09] chandankumar: Where did you enter the username, and which URL gives you the error? [06:10] The OpenStack wiki's OpenID integration should not ask for a username in a normal situation. [06:11] wgrant, https://wiki.openstack.org/w/index.php?title=Special:UserLogin&action=submitlogin&type=login&returnto=Main+Page&returntoquery=welcome%3Dyes [06:11] wgrant, There is no user by the name "Chandankumar.093047". Usernames are case sensitive. Check your spelling, or create a new account. [06:12] wgrant, i have tried it by changing all the cases, but not able to login [06:12] chandankumar: That sounds like an error from OpenStack's wiki, not from Launchpad or Ubuntu's OpenID service. You'll need to talk to OpenStack people about that. [06:12] wgrant, ok [06:12] wgrant, Thanks [09:39] * mpt just went to reply to a misguided bug comment, only to find that its author had already hidden the comment themselves ♥ [09:41] :) [11:40] hey [11:40] how does one see who is admin for a project? (e.g can edit its details) [11:40] e.g https://launchpad.net/shotwell [11:40] is that the Maintainer? [11:41] Yep [11:41] cjwatson, thanks [11:41] Drivers can do some things as well, though I see that project doesn't have any [11:41] seems like Jim doesn't know he's admin for that project [11:42] I can check specific permissions for specific things if you need it [11:42] cjwatson, context is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/1254923/comments/2 [11:42] Ubuntu bug 1254923 in shotwell (Ubuntu) "Source repo has moved" [Low,Incomplete] [11:43] cjwatson, they also want to claim ownership for some of their projects, I guess https://launchpad.net/~registry is still the right place (I had that in my old notes) [11:43] well, the "file a request on answers" [11:44] For a git URL change we can just alter the existing branch. [11:44] Since it seems the repository has just moved. [11:44] Jim should have a pencil icon next to his name on https://launchpad.net/shotwell that he can use to reassign it to a team if he wants. [11:45] cjwatson, thanks [11:46] wgrant, that would be nice, indeed they migrated to https://git.gnome.org/browse/shotwell/log/ [11:46] well git://git.gnome.org/shotwell [11:46] rather [11:52] seb128: Done, and the branch has reimported. [12:25] wgrant, excellent, thanks! [12:35] I'm having issues finding a doc on this, but how can I configure who can approve blueprints for my project on LP? [12:39] mattymo: The definition status of a blueprint can be changed by (a) Launchpad admins (b) the maintainer of the blueprint's target/goal (c) a driver of the blueprint's target/goal (d) the owner, drafter, assignee, or approver of the blueprint. [12:40] mattymo: The usual way to configure this is to set a team as your project's "driver" and then add people to that team. [12:42] I believe I understand and follow you [12:42] cjwatson, all the fields can be changed though, including status can be marked complete without the approver actually approving, it seems [12:45] The exact order of the approval workflow isn't enforced, no [12:46] In practice in Ubuntu we've normally found that it's better to let developers clean up themselves without needing to go and get a manager to sign off ... [13:10] cjwatson, informal workflow process - got it. I understand the benefits [14:08] I wish to have a PPA that I can use for testing, and be able to give to the security team to copy files out of for their pocket. I think I need some special attributes set, but I don't know which ones. I need help. [14:08] I think the builders for ARMHF and such have to be non-virt, or native. [14:11] The PPA must be devirtualised [14:11] (For all architectures, not that you get a choice) [14:14] I filed this https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/239046 already. [14:15] Right, you'll need a webop to do that for you. [14:15] Ask on #webops internal. [14:15] Ah, thanks, cjw. [14:16] There shouldn't be any other relevant requirements. [15:46] cjwatson: are there plans to whitelist arm64 from britney so that packages can transition to -release even if arm64 isn't built? [15:46] or do I just ask it to be forced [15:49] shadeslayer: questions about ubuntu-specific stuff are probably better suited to being asked in #ubuntu-devel or #ubuntu-release [15:49] okay [15:49] shadeslayer: and that sounds like maybe a release team decision [15:49] *nod* [17:15] jamespage: https://twitter.com/czajkowski/status/405743351087235072 [17:18] czajkowski: irc linking a twitter link to a web link is pretty funny :) [17:21] mgz: well yes but as it was the easiest [17:21] :)O [17:21] mgz: also howdy :D [17:21] how've you been [17:21] good, though winter is rubbish. and you? [17:22] good thanks, just got a puppy and working away. [17:22] heading to Barcelona this weekend for work and then countdown for Christmas! [17:24] ha, bet spain is a little warmer, lucky you [17:24] 3 days and working as long as I ge ta nice dinner I won't mind === BradCrittenden is now known as bac === gaughen is now known as gaughen_af === gaughen_af is now known as gaughen_afk === gaughen_afk is now known as gaughen === thomi_ is now known as thomi