[01:24] <lifeless> wgrant: is date_closed set when status -> Opinion?
[01:24]  * lifeless is being lazt
[01:26] <wgrant>         if ((old_status in DB_UNRESOLVED_BUGTASK_STATUSES) and
[01:26] <wgrant>             (new_status in RESOLVED_BUGTASK_STATUSES)):
[01:26] <wgrant>             self.date_closed = when
[01:26] <wgrant> RESOLVED_BUGTASK_STATUSES = ( BugTaskStatus.FIXRELEASED, BugTaskStatus.OPINION,
[01:26] <wgrant> lifeless: ^^
[01:27] <lifeless> great, thanks
[01:27] <lifeless> https://api.launchpad.net/1.0.html#bug_task is stale then
[01:27] <lifeless> it claims "
[01:27] <lifeless> Date Closed
[01:27] <lifeless> The date on which this task was marked either Won't Fix, Invalid or Fix Released.
[01:27] <pac1> A bug was marked as fixed in karmic, but it is also present in 13.10 as bug 1239912 The 13.10 bug was marked as a duplicate of the karmic bug.   #390421.  I removed the duplicate mark because the old bug was against karmic.  Was that the right thing to do?  If not I'll un-do it.
[01:27] <lifeless> "
[01:27] <_mup_> Bug #1239912: system-config-lvm fails to start citing missing /etc/init.d/lvm2 <amd64> <apport-bug> <patch> <saucy> <system-config-lvm (Ubuntu):Confirmed> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1239912>
[01:27] <_mup_> Bug #390421: system-config-lvm fails with invoke-rc.d: unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/lvm2 not found. <amd64> <apport-bug> <bitesize> <patch> <regression-potential> <system-config-lvm (Ubuntu):Fix Released> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/390421>
[01:27] <wgrant> pac1: The new bug should be unduped if the old one was already fixed years ago.
[01:28] <wgrant> (also, this sort of question about Ubuntu's bug management policies probably makes more sense in #ubuntu-bugs)
[01:28] <wgrant> lifeless: Opinion shouldn't really exist, but Expired should be added to that list.
[01:28] <pac1> ok thanks.  I'll go there next.
[01:28] <lifeless> wgrant: agreed on should, but it does.
[01:28] <lifeless> wgrant: the real bug is the duplication of definition
[01:29] <wgrant> Sure
[01:29] <lifeless> anyhow
[01:29] <lifeless> just thought you'd like to know why I was asking a daft q :)
[01:30] <wgrant> Yeah, will land a fix once buildbot is unbroken
[01:30] <wgrant> I wonder if I can delete Opinion without Mark noticing :)
[01:46] <lifeless> wgrant: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/58903/
[01:47] <lifeless> (sample output in there now)
[02:01] <wgrant> lifeless: Nice
[02:03] <wgrant> (apidoc fix is in trunk)
[02:03] <lifeless> cool, thanks
[02:09] <lifeless> wgrant: obviously if you have suggestions about the bugstats thing, I'm all ears.
[06:55] <wgrant> stub: https://code.launchpad.net/~wgrant/launchpad/multiproc-builders-db/+merge/197013
[06:59] <stub> wgrant: r=stub
[07:02] <wgrant> stub: Thanks.
[13:36] <wgrant> stub: https://code.launchpad.net/~wgrant/launchpad/antibfjo-9-db-kill/+merge/196640