[09:30]  * apw yawns
[16:52] <apw> ppisati, yo ... do we ahve any arm builds out of the master branch on precise ?
[16:53] <ppisati> apw: omap4?
[16:53] <ppisati> apw: and highbank iirc
[16:53] <apw> oosi we di
[16:53] <apw> ppisati, so we do ... 
[16:53] <ppisati> apw: ok, just omap4 for us
[16:53] <ppisati> apw: highbank&c are hwe kernels
[16:54] <apw> ppisati, so when this next batch of precise kernels come round we will have some scarey cves in it so we will need to do some proper testing to make sure they boot
[16:55] <ppisati> apw: ok, just ping when you need tests and i'll take care
[16:55] <ppisati> *ping me
[16:56] <apw> ppisati, thanks
[16:56] <apw> henrix, are you trying to give me a heart attack with these cve patches! :)
[16:57] <henrix> apw: heh the ARM assembly one? :)
[16:57] <ppisati> what could go wrong after all? :)
[16:57] <ppisati> and with that said
[16:57]  * ppisati goes for some supplies
[16:57] <henrix> yeah, it is scary... but it seems to be doing something trivial: renaming a macro
[16:58] <apw> henrix, yeah that one, the second one aint so trivial, but the bug is nasty nasty
[16:58] <apw> and i think it will either work or not boot being as those are used for everything
[16:58] <henrix> apw: well, i can't boot test it (but i build tested). anyway, feel free to NACK it and i'll try to get it the 2nd commit backported instead
[18:10] <apw> henrix, na, i think it is the right thing as it is definatly the same then.  i think i want to say for both "please lets add omre testing for the relevant architecuters to the list"
[18:12] <henrix> apw: sure, thanks