[16:06] <eagles0513875> pleia2: hey
[16:06] <eagles0513875> hey belkinsa pleia2 its interesting how this topic i brought up just before 13.10 release resurfaced
[16:07] <belkinsa> Yeah, re-thought about it.
[16:39] <pleia2> eagles0513875: yeah, it's something we've needed to work on for a long time, particularly now that we mostly have the official docs under control
[16:40] <eagles0513875> pleia2: i think as i said in my email replicate the official ones and use the community ones as as ones that get updated and fixed
[16:40] <eagles0513875> less work for those on the official docs team
[16:41] <pleia2> we don't really want to copy all the text over, my recommendation in the last thread about this was to put a link
[16:41] <pleia2> so link to official docs, then expand upon it if you want in the wiki
[16:58] <eagles0513875> pleia2: maybe so but what if there are bugs on the official docs
[16:58] <pleia2> then we fix them :)
[16:58] <eagles0513875> at least with the wiki replicating the official docs is that you can then if i come and say hey there is a mistake here thisi should be blah blah blah we can do so with the wiki
[16:58] <eagles0513875> how though how do the official docs get fixed
[16:58] <pleia2> if you don't want to fix them, you can submit a bug against the docs
[16:59] <pleia2> the docs team updates them and then they upload a new package
[16:59] <pleia2> if it's in a stable release, they do a stable release update, SRU
[16:59] <eagles0513875> how often are SRU's done
[17:00] <pleia2> depends on the release, severity of the bug and how much people power we have
[17:00] <pleia2> preferably people will be contributing to bug fixes during the development of docs so this doesn't happen
[17:00] <pleia2> I think this is mostly a social problem, we need to convince folks to review the docs under development
[20:41] <bkerensa> =o