| === jalcine- is now known as jalcine | ||
| === LoganCloud is now known as Guest49309 | ||
| === Guest49309 is now known as LoganCloud | ||
| === freeflying_away is now known as freeflying | ||
| dholbach | good morning | 08:01 |
|---|---|---|
| geser | good morning | 08:11 |
| === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach | ||
| === barry` is now known as barry_ | ||
| === barry_ is now known as barry | ||
| === freeflying is now known as freeflying_away | ||
| hakermania | If I have uploaded an earlier version of my application and thus I had a sponsor for it, should I contact him for a new version of the app and a new library not in the repos which is a dependency of this new version of the application? | 16:18 |
| Laney | hakermania: I don't think so, use the sponsor queue as normal (for new packages I advise you use Debian, again as normal) | 16:33 |
| hakermania | Laney, yes, I've already sent the library to Debian, and I want to start programming the application to use the library, but as I intend the application to be in 14.04 I want a sure way to have the library quickly reviewed and pushed into the repos. | 16:35 |
| hakermania | "sent the library to Debian" = for review. It isn't in the repos yet. | 16:36 |
| Laney | ok, well if you need to then use the normal process | 16:36 |
| Laney | it's fine to point your old sponsor to it, but they may not have time to look for you | 16:36 |
| hakermania | Laney, when a package is accepted in Debian how long does it take to show up in ubuntu repos (or is it immediately on "apt-get update" ?) | 16:37 |
| Laney | hakermania: a few days for new sources usually (up to debian import freeze) | 16:38 |
| hakermania | Laney, is there a way to find out who my previous sponsor was :P I've completely forgotten. | 17:14 |
| hakermania | I think it was ScottK but I'm not sure at all. | 17:14 |
| Adri2000 | hakermania: gpg --verify on the .dsc will tell you who signed the source package | 17:15 |
| Laney | go to http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/<package>/+changelog and click on the version you want and then look for the "Sponsored by" field | 17:15 |
| Laney | or find it on <release>-changes and look for Signed-by | 17:15 |
| Adri2000 | or that :) | 17:16 |
| Laney | If you can get the dsc you can probably see it via one of those other two methods | 17:17 |
| Laney | but that also works :P | 17:18 |
| mitya57 | Or look at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/RELEASE/+source/PACKAGE/VERSION | 17:21 |
| hakermania | Yep, the gpg matches ScottK's | 17:21 |
| Laney | I usually can't remember the exact version | 17:22 |
| hakermania | Thanks guys | 17:23 |
| aeoril | I am here: http://developer.ubuntu.com/packaging/html/getting-set-up.html but when I read about using the development version of Ubuntu to develop with, it gets confusing - should I be using testdrive? | 19:52 |
| Noskcaj | aeoril, testdrive is for running the developement version in a VM. If you have the devel version as your OS or a schoot (pbuilder) of the devel version, you don't need it | 19:56 |
| aeoril | I have read the topic here and am now redirecting my web research to: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing - it is quite different. Is the MOTU team still the best way to get involved in contributing to Ubuntu as a developer (not apps, but Ubuntu itself)? | 19:59 |
| Noskcaj | aeoril, If you are interesting in packaging, yes. There is also a number of ubuntu specific apps, testing tools (testdrive and automated tests), and bug fixing | 20:02 |
| aeoril | nosk | 20:07 |
| aeoril | Noskcajk I had been told previously MOTU was a good place to start because most if not all development requires packaging, so it is a good place to start (MOTU) as launch point for most development related work | 20:09 |
| Noskcaj | aeoril, yep | 20:09 |
| Noskcaj | tip: You can autocomplete a name in irc by pressing TAB | 20:09 |
| aeoril | Noskcaj yes, I know - that was a finger gone haywire :) | 20:10 |
| Noskcaj | ok | 20:10 |
| aeoril | A while ago I was active on Ubuntu - but it has been some years, and I did not do much - https://launchpad.net/~sanbar | 20:11 |
| aeoril | I am pondering what to do with my free time and am thinking about re-engaging with Ubuntu | 20:12 |
| Noskcaj | awesome. A good place to start is http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/ , which has a number of pages for things you can do for the motu team | 20:15 |
| aeoril | Noskcaj ok, cool - thanks! | 20:17 |
| Noskcaj | xnox, Mind if i merge handbrake? | 20:52 |
| Noskcaj | I've run out of merges i can do that i have been allowed to | 20:53 |
| Noskcaj | And lives is probably syncable | 20:56 |
| xnox | Noskcaj: go ahead. | 21:00 |
| === lderan_ is now known as lderan | ||
| Noskcaj | Anyone have merges i can take? (All the current "please take"s need programming languages i don't know) | 23:21 |
| jtaylor | Noskcaj: if you are really bored you can have a look why skimage autopkgtests fail | 23:25 |
| jtaylor | I can't reproduce the issue locally | 23:25 |
| Noskcaj | jtaylor, I'll have a look, but autopkgtest isn't something i'm remotely good at | 23:29 |
| Noskcaj | how do i see the failure? | 23:32 |
| jtaylor | Noskcaj: https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/Trusty/view/AutoPkgTest/job/trusty-adt-skimage/ | 23:42 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!