[05:43] <pitti> Good morning
[06:14] <gema> morning :D
[06:28] <pitti> hey gema, early for you!
[06:32] <gema> pitti: indeed :D
[08:20] <DanChapman> good morning
[08:24] <Noskcaj> hey DanChapman
[12:01] <davmor2> Morning all
[13:51] <pitti> jibel_: question about new jenkins
[13:51] <pitti> jibel_: http://d-jenkins.ubuntu-ci:8080/job/trusty-adt-apport/ is still marked as "failed", although I "matrix reloaded" i386 (failed due to dreaded hash sum mismatch)
[13:52] <jibel> pitti, looking
[13:52] <pitti> jibel: that worked in the old jenkins; that's a bug?
[13:52] <pitti> jibel: i. e. should I better only use "build now"? (that wastes a run on the other arch, though)
[13:52] <jibel> the notification plugin changed too apparently
[13:54] <jibel> pitti, looks like a bug in jenkins to me
[13:54] <jibel> pitti, http://d-jenkins.ubuntu-ci:8080/job/trusty-adt-apport/36/testReport/
[13:54]  * pitti wants a "Look at it harder, Mr. Jenkins!" button
[13:54] <jibel> reports 1 failure, but everything passed
[13:55] <pitti> jibel: thanks; I'll rebuild apport again
[13:55] <jibel> pitti, britney should see a pass on both arch though
[13:56] <pitti> jibel: not sure, http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html doesn't have apport
[13:56] <pitti> jibel: often, when I get a "jenkins failed" mail, that package isn't there ^
[13:56] <pitti> so it's often hard to say why a particular test was triggered
[13:56] <jibel> pitti, the result is still in the queue and as not been processed by britney yet
[13:56] <pitti> same with "crash" (which just failed on i386)
[13:56] <jibel> hm, no
[13:56] <jibel> nm
[13:58] <jibel> public jenkins sees a failure too
[14:09] <jibel> pitti, apparently if you don't re-run all the configurations of a matrix job, results are not published to the public instance
[14:09] <jibel> in jenkins' logs I find INFO: trusty-adt-apport ? i386,adt #36 main build action completed: SUCCESS
[14:09] <jibel> but no associated publication
[14:10] <pitti> jibel: so that's even for "internal" publication within jenkins, not just for hte public jenkins.q.u.c.?
[14:11] <jibel> pitti, that's for the publication to jenkins.qa.u.c, I haven't found why it doesn't see the successful run. but it's better to avoid that matrix relaoded thing
[14:12] <pitti> jibel: ok, will do; it was quite useful until the upgrade
[14:16] <jibel> pitti, on the server, jenkins updated i386 but didn't update the main result file which aggregates all the archs. So, definitely a bug. I was quite happy with jenkins until the upgrade too.
[23:22] <Noskcaj> Can someone with a spare 14.04 install try https://launchpad.net/~noskcaj/+archive/indicator-gtk3 ? I don't fully trust my packaging