=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun [05:43] Good morning [06:14] morning :D [06:28] hey gema, early for you! [06:32] pitti: indeed :D === iahmad is now known as iahmad|afk [08:20] good morning [08:24] hey DanChapman === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun === iahmad|afk is now known as iahmad === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk === _salem is now known as salem_ [12:01] Morning all === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk [13:51] jibel_: question about new jenkins === jibel_ is now known as jibel [13:51] jibel_: http://d-jenkins.ubuntu-ci:8080/job/trusty-adt-apport/ is still marked as "failed", although I "matrix reloaded" i386 (failed due to dreaded hash sum mismatch) [13:52] pitti, looking [13:52] jibel: that worked in the old jenkins; that's a bug? [13:52] jibel: i. e. should I better only use "build now"? (that wastes a run on the other arch, though) [13:52] the notification plugin changed too apparently [13:54] pitti, looks like a bug in jenkins to me [13:54] pitti, http://d-jenkins.ubuntu-ci:8080/job/trusty-adt-apport/36/testReport/ [13:54] * pitti wants a "Look at it harder, Mr. Jenkins!" button [13:54] reports 1 failure, but everything passed [13:55] jibel: thanks; I'll rebuild apport again [13:55] pitti, britney should see a pass on both arch though [13:56] jibel: not sure, http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html doesn't have apport [13:56] jibel: often, when I get a "jenkins failed" mail, that package isn't there ^ [13:56] so it's often hard to say why a particular test was triggered [13:56] pitti, the result is still in the queue and as not been processed by britney yet [13:56] same with "crash" (which just failed on i386) [13:56] hm, no [13:56] nm [13:58] public jenkins sees a failure too [14:09] pitti, apparently if you don't re-run all the configurations of a matrix job, results are not published to the public instance [14:09] in jenkins' logs I find INFO: trusty-adt-apport ? i386,adt #36 main build action completed: SUCCESS [14:09] but no associated publication [14:10] jibel: so that's even for "internal" publication within jenkins, not just for hte public jenkins.q.u.c.? [14:11] pitti, that's for the publication to jenkins.qa.u.c, I haven't found why it doesn't see the successful run. but it's better to avoid that matrix relaoded thing [14:12] jibel: ok, will do; it was quite useful until the upgrade [14:16] pitti, on the server, jenkins updated i386 but didn't update the main result file which aggregates all the archs. So, definitely a bug. I was quite happy with jenkins until the upgrade too. === salem_ is now known as _salem === lderan_ is now known as lderan === Ursinha_ is now known as Ursinha [23:22] Can someone with a spare 14.04 install try https://launchpad.net/~noskcaj/+archive/indicator-gtk3 ? I don't fully trust my packaging