kees | say, will saucy be 3.11 or 3.12 do you think? | 00:21 |
---|---|---|
elmo | kees: you mean trusty? | 00:28 |
elmo | kees: because saucy is already 3.11 ;-) | 00:29 |
kees | elmo: argh, off-by-one error. _trusty_, yes :) | 00:29 |
kees | aaah, never mind. | 00:30 |
kees | linux | 3.12.0-5.13 | trusty/main | 00:30 |
Sarvatt | kees: its going to be 3.13 | 00:41 |
kees | Sarvatt: okay, cool, thanks :) | 00:42 |
=== gfrog_afk is now known as gfrog | ||
=== shuduo_afk is now known as shuduo | ||
=== fmasi is now known as Guest16225 | ||
apw | kees, yeah 3.13 is sitting in our PPA waiting on the dkms packages etc to catch up | 09:06 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
=== Kaloz_ is now known as Kaloz | ||
=== gfrog is now known as gfrog_afk | ||
=== shuduo is now known as shuduo_afk | ||
=== ivoks_ is now known as ivoks | ||
smoser | hey. | 14:04 |
smoser | do we have any sort of benchmarks that are done and recorded for kernel releases ? | 14:05 |
smb | smoser, sconklin has been working on some storage/fs ones | 14:06 |
smoser | i'm wondering because i have extremely unscientific data in my head that recent trusty is not performing as well as previous releases on my laptop. | 14:06 |
smoser | that unscientific data "feels" like IO to me. | 14:06 |
smb | smoser, iirc there _was_ a regression in ext4 which cking found but that was saucy, I think | 14:07 |
smoser | smb, as in fixed ? | 14:08 |
smb | smoser, Yes, also going to S | 14:09 |
smoser | are the benchmarks sconklin has available ? | 14:10 |
cking | smoser, it was address in bug 1242812 | 14:11 |
ubot2` | Launchpad bug 1242812 in linux (Ubuntu) "ext4 random block I/O write performance regression with 3.11 Saucy Kernel" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1242812 | 14:11 |
cking | it appeared in one of the power regression tests, but those tests are now busted, pending QA to plug in the H/W again | 14:13 |
apw | smoser, and remember we're on 3.12 in trusty atm | 14:47 |
tseliot | apw: what kernel version are we going to use in 14.04? | 16:20 |
bjf | tseliot, 3.13 | 16:22 |
tseliot | bjf: thanks | 16:22 |
apw | that ;) | 16:24 |
tseliot | :) | 16:25 |
hallyn_ | apw: http://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/4/156 i'm going to review this patchset asap, we may need it in trusty for userns containers to work nicely | 18:05 |
hallyn_ | (to allow writing to /proc/self/loginuid) | 18:05 |
apw | hallyn_, 0/20 ... really | 18:09 |
apw | sigh | 18:12 |
hallyn_ | apw: :( | 18:16 |
hallyn_ | apw: i'll take a look this afternoon to see if it's actually complicated, or just long-winded or very broken up | 18:17 |
apw | how did we get so far from having the patches we needed as we were at vUDS | 18:17 |
apw | we so do not want to be introducing a new heap of abi if they anr't sure this is the way upstream either, gah | 18:18 |
apw | also it seems to claim to be incomplete | 18:19 |
apw | >> This patchset still need some work, such as allow changing | 18:19 |
apw | >> audit_enabled in audit namespace, auditd wants this feature. | 18:19 |
apw | >> | 18:19 |
apw | and it doesn't sound like upstream will even start looking at it for weeks yet | 18:21 |
apw | hallyn_, plus this calls itself 'part1' and the previous version was 00/48 ... are we sure this is even all of it ? | 18:24 |
hallyn_ | 18:17 < apw> how did we get so far from having the patches we needed as we were at vUDS | 18:25 |
hallyn_ | well all *we* need is /proc/$$/loginuid writeable. there maybe a shorter way to do it, i simply haven't looked. | 18:26 |
hallyn_ | i only know that fedora has the same issue and they claimed to be waitin go this patchset | 18:26 |
hallyn_ | apw: we *can* work around it in userspace if there's not a clean patchset we can use | 18:27 |
ohsix | isn't it immutable for the purpose of auditing? | 18:27 |
apw | ohsix, it is less immutable, as 'change able once able' | 18:28 |
apw | and i assume hallyn_ wants to make the init in a container be able to set it once again | 18:28 |
ohsix | ah | 18:28 |
ohsix | i wonder why someone hasn't proposed just adding another one, maybe one that keeps a list of ones that have been set or something | 18:29 |
apw | i guess it makes sense if you have a uidns that you might want to have audit be reset in there, hrm | 18:29 |
hallyn_ | apw: well tbh none of it makes sense to me - i thought loginuid should be only for LSPP cred tracking for audit, but it seemingly is now being abused | 18:36 |
apw | hallyn_, it does look like it is doing more than making that writable for sure, it is splitting auditd as well | 18:36 |
apw | blimey this is tensy changes | 18:46 |
* apw notes it is well past beer-o-clock and goes and does somwething abou tit | 19:05 | |
cking | yeah, well into beer time now | 19:26 |
=== Guest11320 is now known as kamal | ||
=== kamal is now known as Guest64627 | ||
=== retoaded is now known as retoaded_biab | ||
=== Guest64627 is now known as kamal | ||
=== retoaded_biab is now known as retoaded |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!