=== _salem is now known as salem_ === salem_ is now known as _salem === jono is now known as Guest52213 [08:27] Saviq: Hi! I see that the broken_collapse branch still has problems merging - Robert also reported a text conflict with merge-to-trunk - could you poke Albert to fix that? [08:38] sil2100: hey, meanwhile, can you grab info on the upstart-app-launch/greyback/ted issue? (when they are around) [08:40] didrocks: hey! Sure, been waiting on ted on that [08:40] didrocks: since I checked the branches in upstart-app-launch and didn't see any progress [08:40] sil2100: catch him in a corner so that he can't get out without any answer! :) [08:40] sil2100: yeah, did the same :( [08:41] ;) [09:09] tedg: morning! :) [09:09] tedg: you know what I want to ask, don't you? [09:09] sil2100, Why yes, these are new shoes! Thanks for asking! [09:10] tedg: uh oh! I knew it! [09:10] tedg: oh, and while we're at this topic... any progress on the upstart-app-launch modification? ;p [09:10] sil2100, The branch works. Writing tests. gerry was able to verify it on his end as well. [09:10] sil2100, Need to clean up and get ready to MR. [09:11] tedg: sounds super awesome [09:11] tedg: ok, thanks for the work! [09:11] tsdgeos: morning [09:12] tsdgeos: the broken_collapse branch seems to be still failing to merge - I also saw Robert noticing that there is a conflict when merging to trunk [09:12] sil2100, FYI, we're bumping API/ABI on the lib. Shouldn't be a big deal as we have the accompanying main user. But will complicate landing. [09:12] sil2100: morning! [09:12] really? [09:12] that's weird [09:12] i'll have a look [09:12] tx for the heads up [09:13] tedg: hm, ok, good to know, we'll keep that in mind during release [09:13] tsdgeos: np, thanks for the code - once your branch lands, we'll have all that's needed for a release of unity8 [09:14] ah probably conflicted with the other test i made for the carousel click [09:14] yep [09:19] sil2100: done [09:20] tedg: so rebuilding url-dispatcher, libcontent-hub0 and libunity-mir1, right? [09:20] tedg: if you can get the candy early enough, that will help us to get an image promoted today [09:21] tsdgeos: you think it will land now? [09:21] sil2100: tbh i'm not sure [09:22] the test is a bit of a hacky thing [09:22] in that since it tries to prove an animation is happening [09:22] and given how slow the VM machines are [09:22] it may happen that the animation just goes from beginning to end in one go [09:22] but it should work [09:23] sil2100: still need someone to top approve it though [09:23] didrocks, Do we have to way to for libual1 to drop out before libual2 can get into the image, or can we have both for a short time? [09:23] tsdgeos: top approving [09:23] if doesn't merge, i already talked with Saviq yesterday about removing that tricky part of the test [09:24] tedg: -proposed is blocking that unfortunately [09:24] tedg: so, we can only get one [09:24] didrocks, K, I'll need a content hub patch as well then :-/ [09:25] tedg: ok, I think a note/email/anything with a summary would help coordination then [09:25] * tedg invokes kenvandine [09:25] tedg: good luck! [09:25] Let me finish the tests and get that MR'd, then I'll look towards coordination. [09:28] thx man === john-mca` is now known as john-mcaleely [11:18] sil2100: how is it going for unity8? did you get any news? [11:20] maybe kgunn would know about the status of the unity8 release (is that branch coming) [11:20] it is coming [11:20] just fighting our CI friend [11:21] tsdgeos: ok, can you ping us on that (sil2100 and I) [11:22] sure [11:22] ah wait, besides my branch there's also greyback's back that needs to branch afaik [11:22] that's also coming [11:22] Saviq knows more :D [11:23] is Saviq around? [11:23] tried to catch him for the past 4 hours :p [11:23] tsdgeos: hum, do you have details on that branch? is it a release blocker or something for upstart-app-launch (and so unity-mir?) [11:23] didrocks: he is sitting by my side :D [11:24] tsdgeos: mind poking him and asking him to look at IRC? [11:24] :) [11:24] just did [11:24] harder! :-) [11:24] didrocks, here [11:24] hey! [11:25] didrocks, sorry, didn't kick my IRC in this morning [11:25] Saviq: no worry, I know what the sprints are :) [11:25] so, just trying to get more info, tsdgeos is fighting with CI apparently [11:25] he's talking about another branch from greyback? [11:25] didrocks, yeah, we still have an issue on touch mediumtests unfortunately [11:26] didrocks, but we'll get there [11:26] didrocks, the branch tsdgeos was talking about is for unity-mir [11:26] Saviq: ok, so linked to upstart-app-launch fix? [11:26] didrocks, to fix dialer on maguro, when upstart-app-launch has merged its side of the fixed [11:26] didrocks, yes [11:27] ok, no news then! [11:27] Saviq: do we have hope to get it today? [11:27] sorryyyyy [11:27] (unity-mir that is) [11:27] tsdgeos: just keep us posted, I hope we can get unity8 to release soon so that we can cross that one :) [11:30] didrocks, oh yeah [11:30] thanks Saviq, tsdgeos :) [11:30] didrocks, greyback is on it, practically ready [11:31] Saviq: ok, so to align with the API change from tedg I guess [11:31] didrocks, exactly [11:32] didrocks: that's the only blocker right ? [11:33] kgunn: we have 2: so the one where we need to release unity8 + the dialer app one which is upstart-app-launch (which seems to require unity-mir, url-dispatcher and libcontent-hub changes or at least rebuild) [11:33] greyback: hello! [11:34] sil2100: heya, almost done, just testing ted's final code with my branch, then I can propose it [11:34] greyback: heard from Saviq that the last bits of the bug-that-we-all-know-of are almost there? :) [11:34] Excellent [11:35] didrocks: right (my bad...i knew the other one for dash media playing too) [11:35] just making sure no others tho [11:35] tsdgeos: can't we somehow re-write the test code? [11:35] kgunn: no worry! Hard to track in the jungle of daily issue, I understand :) [11:35] sil2100: which one? :D [11:35] sil2100: it's not my new test code that's failing at the moment :D [11:36] it's just the generic CI crashes-weirdness that prevents it from landing [11:36] we need to track them down [11:36] * sil2100 looks [11:36] when someone has time :D [11:36] sil2100: it's unity8's fault, not CI [11:37] unity8 crashes on CI? [11:37] it just did, yes [11:37] there seems to be a weird race on startup that makes it crash seldomly [11:38] of course one of those you can't repro almost at all === _salem is now known as salem_ [12:02] tsdgeos: keep us posted if you get that merged in somehow [12:08] MacSlow: fixed this one. wanna reapprove? https://code.launchpad.net/~mzanetti/unity8/lockscreen-default-variable-pinlength/+merge/197848 [12:12] Saviq: your opinion on this one please: https://code.launchpad.net/~mhr3/unity-scopes-shell/hook-scopes-ng/+merge/196608/comments/458906 [12:13] mzanetti, done [12:14] mhr3: approved [12:15] mzanetti, danke schon [12:15] mzanetti: Saviq: please, don't merge anything else in unity8 trunk [12:15] MacSlow: ^ [12:16] sil2100: I stoped it FYI ^ [12:16] stopped* [12:16] didrocks, what's the issue? [12:16] didrocks, k [12:16] MacSlow: we are trying to get an unity8 release out [12:16] didrocks, ah ok [12:17] thanks guys :) [12:17] MacSlow: once you have the merge back in trunk, feel free to reapprove [12:18] didrocks, I did set mzanetti's branch back to "Needs Review" for the moment then [12:18] MacSlow: perfect, thanks! [12:18] didrocks, all good then? [12:18] didrocks, d'accord [12:18] yep ;) [12:18] perfect! [12:18] ACK [12:19] tsdgeos: any news on that branchie? === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch [12:37] sil2100: fyi https://code.launchpad.net/~gerboland/unity-mir/wait-for-upstart-notification/+merge/198041 [12:37] greyback: \o/ [12:40] \o/ [12:42] tedg: so, upstart-app-launch merged? you are working on content-hub, and about url-dispatcher, will it be just a rebuild needed? [12:43] didrocks, Just top approved. Branches ready, but I need to get the updated package to publish in the PPA before Jenkins will pass them. [12:43] didrocks, Thinking about grabbing lunch now, as it'll take a while for the PPA to publish. [12:43] didrocks, Then the other MRs can get approved after that. [12:43] tedg: do you have the branches so that we can top approve meanwhile? [12:44] if it's in the PPA first [12:44] didrocks, They'll get rejected, I've got them, but Jenkins will be angry. [12:44] tedg: I mean, just paste the links, we'll deal with them :) [12:45] we already have the unity-mir link [12:45] Oh, okay. Just a sec. [12:45] https://code.launchpad.net/~ted/upstart-app-launch/application-starting/+merge/198027 [12:45] https://code.launchpad.net/~ted/content-hub/ual2/+merge/198044 [12:45] https://code.launchpad.net/~ted/url-dispatcher/ual2/+merge/198045 [12:45] didrocks, ^ [12:45] tedg: thanks! [12:45] sil2100: ^ [12:46] Ouuu yeaaa [12:48] * sil2100 waits for the upstart-app-launch merge to be done [13:07] didrocks, tedg: the upstart branch merged, I'll spin upstart [13:07] sil2100: please yeah, build it in the ppa === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g [13:13] didrocks: sil2100: it's in [13:14] \o/ [13:14] sil2100: kicking unity8? [13:15] sil2100: just done it, to win few minutes :) [13:19] ;) [13:20] didrocks: thanks! [13:20] tsdgeos: thanks as well ;) [13:28] Mirv, ping [13:28] Saviq: Mirv has a national holiday today [13:28] sil2100, ok, maybe you can help - we've a "qtdeclarative5-dev (>= 5.2~) | libqt5v8-5-private-dev" [13:28] build-depends in unity8 [13:29] that seems to fail on < 5.2, though [13:29] as it will still try and install qtdeclarative5-dev, but there's only 5.0 [13:29] so goes: Depends: qtdeclarative5-dev (>= 5.2~) but 5.0.2-6ubuntu5 is to be installed [13:30] sil2100, wait, that might be incorrect [13:30] sil2100, ignore [13:30] sil2100, it's fixed in trunk [13:35] Saviq: who could review https://code.launchpad.net/~gerboland/unity-mir/wait-for-upstart-notification/+merge/198041 ? [13:35] greyback, /me [13:36] ok [13:42] Saviq, can I get a review: https://code.launchpad.net/~thomas-voss/process-cpp/fix_pkgconfig_setup/+merge/198025 [13:44] tvoss, looks like more changes than the commit message describes [13:44] Saviq, yup, will fix the commit message, just saw that, too [13:44] tvoss, anyway might not get to it today [13:45] Saviq, ack [13:45] Saviq: it's in the ppa, so you should be able to approve unity-mir [13:46] tedg: however, we need someone with content-hub right, seems I don't have them [13:46] didrocks, daily-build you mean? won't work [13:46] didrocks, it has to be in distro - we don't build against daily-build now [13:46] Saviq: why? (yeah, in daily-build) [13:46] Saviq: hum, we'll have to merge manually then [13:46] didrocks, bug #1255578 [13:46] bug 1255578 in Ubuntu CI Services "dependency issues on libunity-mir1 in testrunner-otto" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1255578 [13:46] didrocks, yeah, will do [13:47] didrocks, and bug #1255948 [13:47] bug 1255948 in Ubuntu CI Services "upstream merger hooks do not propagate to downstream jobs' builder_hooks" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1255948 [13:47] didrocks, testing now [13:49] didrocks: as discussed, I'll cherry-pick the url-dispatcher and build in the PPA [13:49] sil2100: yes ;) [14:03] didrocks, ? [14:03] didrocks, I'm back, did you figure out the content hub thing. [14:07] tedg: I don't have merge approval power [14:12] * sil2100 is the same [14:16] tvoss, can you approve on content hub ↑? [14:17] didrocks, mind pinging me the mp url? [14:18] tvoss, https://code.launchpad.net/~ted/content-hub/ual2/+merge/198044 I think [14:19] tedg, jenkins is not happy with https://code.launchpad.net/~ted/content-hub/ual2/+merge/198044 [14:21] tvoss: I guess it doesn't have the ppa added [14:22] tvoss: can you try building it locally as there is no integration tests and merge manually? [14:22] (as it's on the path of image blocking) [14:22] didrocks, ack ... [14:22] thanks [14:22] didrocks, which ppa, just to make sure [14:23] tvoss: ~ubuntu-unity/daily-build [14:24] didrocks, ack [14:30] didrocks: from what I see, the unity-mir CI also doesn't use daily-build - the CI rebuild still didn't kick in, but from what I see from the earlier logs, no daily-build added [14:31] didrocks: so we probably have to merge in manually as well ;/ [14:31] sil2100: yeah, sounds legit [14:45] greyback: hi! [14:45] greyback: is it safe to merge in https://code.launchpad.net/~gerboland/unity-mir/wait-for-upstart-notification/+merge/198041 or do you need someone to ACK it first? [14:45] greyback: i.e. did anyone review this already? [14:55] Saviq: are you reviewing that right now ^ ? [14:55] sil2100, yes [14:56] tedg, did you test the fix on the phone? [15:01] tvoss, we're doing it now with greyback [15:01] mhr3, https://launchpad.net/~unity-team/+archive/demo-stuff/+packages [15:05] Saviq, wfm [15:05] Saviq, but another +1 would be helpful [15:07] tvoss, Saviq: give me a sign once it's tested and ACKed, you can then either merge it in manually yourself or I'll do it [15:07] We will spin packages once that's done [15:15] Saviq, with this it should work without restart - http://paste.ubuntu.com/6530154/ [15:16] (of unity) [15:16] Saviq, and actually, you shouldn't need to restart the scope either, just new search [15:19] mhr3, you mean when it works :) [15:20] mhr3, cool [15:27] :D [15:27] hmmm [15:27] wrong window ... [15:30] tsdgeos, it's because your screen is red so you confuse windows [15:43] Saviq, pushed the tiny patch and requested rebuilt in the ppa, should be built in a few minutes [15:44] mhr3, yup, thanks [15:44] mhr3, actually got it built here already [15:44] Saviq, works fine without any restart with your branch ;) [15:44] Saviq, is card-size the only thing that works for now? [15:45] Saviq: any news on the upstart/unity-mir testing? :) [15:45] sil2100, didn't work for me, greyback's verifying the fix and we'll get back to you asap [15:47] Saviq: :( Ok, good to double test it, wouldn't make sense to release it without having certainity that it works [15:49] sil2100, we can't install upstart-app-launch on the devices [15:49] sil2100, it depends on liblttng-ust0, which is not anywhere to be found [15:54] mhall119, ping? [15:56] didrocks, ideas where that came from ↑↑ ? [15:56] mhr3: pong? [15:56] Saviq: did you built it locally against an old version of the phone image? [15:57] didrocks, that's from daily-build [15:57] Saviq: I think cyphermox handled some transition there, so possible that it's not cleaned [15:57] sil2100: ^ [15:57] * didrocks is leaving in 3 minutes, no time to look at that for now [15:57] mhall119, hey, sent you a mail with the latest scopes docs snapshot, could you update it pls? [15:58] mhr3: sure [15:59] Saviq, didrocks: was looking at it just now [15:59] cyphermox: hi, can you shed some light here? ^ [16:01] libupstart-app-launch2 doesn't dep on ust0 [16:01] didrocks, upstart-app-launch does [16:02] Depends: libc6 (>= 2.4), libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.37.0), libjson-glib-1.0-0 (>= 0.12.0), liblttng-ust0, libnih-dbus1 (>= 1.0.0), libnih1 (>= 1.0.0), libupstart-app-launch2 (>= 0.2), libzeitgeist-2.0-0 (>= 0.9.9), click (>= 0.4.9), click-apparmor, upstart (>= 1.11), zeitgeist [16:02] Saviq: here ^ [16:02] for upstart-app-launcher [16:02] launch* [16:02] yes [16:02] liblttng-ust0 is there [16:02] yep [16:02] so, let's see [16:03] But hm, the armhf version shouldn't depend on that [16:04] mhr3: done [16:04] upstart-app-launch depends on liblttng-ust-dev [16:04] which deps on liblttng-ust2, weird [16:04] mhall119, thank you [16:05] Get:222 http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu/ trusty-proposed/main liblttng-ust-dev armhf 2.3.0-4 [137 kB] [16:05] sil2100: there is a bad sync from debian I guess ^ it's in -proposed [16:05] Well, 0.3+14.04.20131126-0ubuntu1 didn't depend on liblttng-ust0 though, checking the new one [16:05] didrocks: ah [16:05] you just need to read the build log :p [16:06] didrocks: what are you doing here still?! [16:06] I'm sure debian didn't bump the soname [16:06] didrocks: shoo shoo! [16:06] sil2100: so, you need someone to fix from the debian sync [16:06] bumping the soname [16:06] upload to proposed [16:06] get upstart-app-launch rebuilt against it [16:07] * sil2100 sighs [16:07] asac: another case of a package lblocked for 2 days in -proposed that is causing us trouble FYI ^ [16:07] sil2100: would be nice if you can coordinate with someone having upload rights [16:08] (debian sync) [16:08] didrocks: will do... [16:08] sil2100: Saviq: didrocks: shouldn't it be liblttng-ust2 now? [16:08] sil2100: everything is clear from my explanations? [16:08] cyphermox: the debian package synced didn't get bumped [16:08] cyphermox: it should, but well... [16:09] weird that we didn't catch that earler [16:09] let me look into it [16:09] sil2100: or another way is to disable -proposed in the ppa [16:09] for now [16:09] kick a rebuild of everything for upstart-app-launch [16:09] publish [16:09] then, it won't get blocked on the ust thingy [16:10] (as it won't use the one in proposed) [16:10] sil2100: want to do that in parallel? [16:10] didrocks: disable in daily-build you mean, yes? [16:10] didrocks: sure, will do that [16:10] yep [16:10] cyphermox: in the meantime, could you take a look and ACK http://q-jenkins.ubuntu-ci:8080/view/cu2d/view/Head/view/Unity8/job/cu2d-unity8-head-3.0publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/packaging_changes_unity8_7.84+14.04.20131206.1-0ubuntu1.diff ? [16:11] sil2100: ok, so -proposed disabled from daily-build ppa [16:11] Since I saw you're around ;) ANd I don't want to keep didrocks from leaving! [16:11] sil2100: please rekick a rebuild of upstart-app-launch [16:11] didrocks: ok, hitting rebuild [16:11] so that you are not blocked on that at least [16:11] Saviq: FYI ^ [16:13] * didrocks really goes now, late… [16:13] oh teh yuck [16:19] I'm not sure removing proposed from the ppa is such a good idea [16:20] kenvandine: maybe you could take a look and ACK? :) http://q-jenkins.ubuntu-ci:8080/view/cu2d/view/Head/view/Unity8/job/cu2d-unity8-head-3.0publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/packaging_changes_unity8_7.84+14.04.20131206.1-0ubuntu1.diff [16:20] sil2100: I'm looking at it... [16:23] sil2100: looks fine to me [16:23] cyphermox: thank you! [16:25] sil2100: so care to tell me again why upstart-app-launch wasn't good? [16:26] oh, because it can't be installed [16:26] because the new liblttng isn't done with proposed yet [16:26] *sigh* [16:27] it would have been sufficient to enable proposed on the device and install that way, with just those packages [16:27] sil2100, feel free to delete all the https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-unity/+recipes [16:27] because now if we don't build against proposed in the PPA we'll have something inconsistent synced to the archive [16:27] mhr3: hah, good joke, me and delete recipes... ;) [16:28] cyphermox: yes [16:28] cyphermox: that's the reason why we disabled -proposed, since otherwise we're blocked [16:28] robru, ^^ if your lp isn't as bad as sil2100's [16:28] sil2100: you aren't any more blocked, you won't be able to publish that package safely. [16:28] s/blocked/unblocked [16:30] True... [16:30] brb [16:33] Saviq: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity8/+bug/1258571 [16:33] Ubuntu bug 1258571 in unity8 (Ubuntu) "Allow for setting different customized backgrounds for phone/tablet, automatically choose appropriate background" [Undecided,New] [16:33] cwayne, cheers [16:40] mzanetti, one quickie pls - https://code.launchpad.net/~mhr3/unity-scopes-shell/hook-scopes-ng/+merge/198093 [16:55] mhr3, will try [17:01] pete-woods, http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=cheers&defid=3883722 [17:05] mhr3, mzanetti's gone, /me ack'ed [17:06] Saviq, thx [17:14] sil2100, do we have a solution to the upstart issue? rebuild against -proposed or? [17:19] sil2100, there's a missing dependency on libupstart-app-launch1 against the same version of upstsart-app-launch itself, tedg will try to make it in time before the release - I'm testing the fix now [17:22] https://code.launchpad.net/~ted/upstart-app-launch/system-dep/+merge/198104 [17:22] Saviq, ^ [17:25] Saviq: new packages landed in the daily ppa, they work for me [17:25] greyback, yup, just rebooted [17:28] cwayne, were you able to get the ppa to work/ [17:28] ? [17:32] robru, can ack a packaging change https://code.launchpad.net/~ted/upstart-app-launch/system-dep/+merge/198104 ? [17:33] Saviq, looking [17:35] Saviq, approved [17:35] robru, thanks [17:35] Saviq, you're welcome [17:58] robru, i see the delete was successful, can you also remove the scope-specific description from https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-unity/+archive/daily-build-next ? === cyphase_ is now known as cyphase [20:20] Saviq: hi! Probably cyphermox already answered, but yes, we have a plan for that [20:21] sil2100: yeah, testing the rebuilds locally right now [20:21] sil2100: then I'll set proposed back on for the ubuntu-unity PPA... [20:21] Saviq: for now though you should be able to install the package from ubuntu-unity to test it locally if that's what you need to do [20:22] cyphermox: thanks, great work with that :) [20:24] sil2100: autopilot is good, unity-scopes-api is good, just wiating for mir to finish in sbuild [20:24] then I'll upload all three [20:24] sil2100: you sticking around long enough to approve merge requests for the changelog changes? [20:25] cyphermox: I guess I'll be around for that, so you can send them to me once those are up and ready [20:28] k [20:29] apprently I don't need to touch unity-scopes-api, the build-dep there is useless :) [21:00] robru, all good, thanks for support over the whole week ;) [21:00] mhr3, no worries, here to help ;-) [21:48] cyphermox: how's it proceeding? === salem_ is now known as _salem [22:00] still rebuilding apparently [22:00] oh, wait [22:00] mixing things up [22:00] I was waiting to make sure autopilot, which is safest, was alright [22:01] just waiting for powerpc really [22:35] cyphermox: ok, I need to EOD now, but I'll be popping up tomorrow anyway [22:35] cyphermox: could you drop me an e-mail as well how all went? [22:38] Thanks! Have a nice weekend guys