[01:35]  * ididitagain is going to idle here and break the rules
[01:41]  * ididitagain is going to idle here and break the rules
[01:44] <LjL> oh noes
[01:44]  * LjL gets some superglue, puts the rules back together
[01:46]  * ididitagain is going to wait here until he is banned or his laptop dies
[01:46] <LjL> @random ban ignore
[01:46] <LjL> you got lucky
[01:49] <ididitagain> ?
[01:50] <ididitagain> God will punish all your sins
[01:51] <ididitagain> LjL: one sin will bring you to hell
[01:51] <LjL> yes i'm pretty sure i've got that covered
[01:52] <ididitagain> For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all. James 2:10
[01:52] <LjL> ididitagain, that's not called idling, fyi
[01:52] <ididitagain> then i will idle now
[01:53]  * ididitagain is idling until he is banned or shuts laptop off
[01:53] <LjL> maybe they'll find some kind of improved battery in the meanwhile
[01:53] <LjL> and you can keep your laptop on indefinitely
[01:54] <ididitagain> !op
[01:54] <ididitagain> !ops
[01:54] <ididitagain> ban me
[01:54] <ididitagain> its britney bitch
[01:54] <ididitagain> !Staff
[01:55] <ididitagain> ban please
[01:55] <ididitagain> i will leave on quiet
[01:55] <ididitagain> lalalalalalalala
[01:55] <ididitagain> !ops
[01:55] <LjL> lalalalalalalalalala
[01:55] <ididitagain> lalalalalalalalalala
[02:27] <IdleOne> lalalalalalalalalala
[14:13] <AcerTwo> who wants to see boobies?
[14:14] <LjL> ew no
[14:14] <AcerTwo> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8f/Blue-footed_Booby_%28Sula_nebouxii%29_-one_leg_raised.jpg
[14:14] <LjL> cute
[14:14] <LjL> is this hfsplus?
[14:14] <k1l> yes it is
[14:14] <AcerTwo> whats up dude
[14:14] <LjL> AcerTwo, on a serious note for a change, i mean this in the best possible way but
[14:15] <LjL> how many years have you been trolling here?
[14:15] <AcerTwo> i am drunk with caffiene
[14:15] <LjL> don't you think it's some kind of cover to keep thinking you're having fun, are cool, or whatnot, but in fact can't face not dealing with the real world?
[14:15] <AcerTwo> i am a hip hop cool granny
[14:15] <LjL> also, too many double negations
[14:16] <AcerTwo> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8f/Blue-footed_Booby_%28Sula_nebouxii%29_-one_leg_raised.jpg
[14:16] <AcerTwo> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8f/Blue-footed_Booby_%28Sula_nebouxii%29_-one_leg_raised.jpg
[14:16] <AcerTwo> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8f/Blue-footed_Booby_%28Sula_nebouxii%29_-one_leg_raised.jpg
[14:16] <AcerTwo> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8f/Blue-footed_Booby_%28Sula_nebouxii%29_-one_leg_raised.jpghttp://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8f/Blue-footed_Booby_%28Sula_nebouxii%29_-one_leg_raised.jpg
[14:16] <AcerTwo> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8f/Blue-footed_Booby_%28Sula_nebouxii%29_-one_leg_raised.jpg
[14:16] <AcerTwo> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8f/Blue-footed_Booby_%28Sula_nebouxii%29_-one_leg_raised.jpg
[14:16] <LjL> what can one do
[14:18] <LjL> 2fast4me
[14:19] <LjL> seriously, i'm not sure i remember a time when hfsplus was *not* trolling ubuntu channels
[14:19] <LjL> and i've been here for what, 8 years?
[14:20] <LjL> maybe i should feel better out of seeing people can be a LOT more bonkers than me
[14:20] <LjL> but i don't
[14:21] <DJones> I thought bonkers was a requirement for IRC
[14:21] <LjL> well yes but it's not black and white
[14:22] <DJones> In a "You don't have to be bonkers to be here, .... but it helps" sort of way :)
[14:22] <LjL> well not everyone is born bonkers anyway
[14:22] <LjL> it's a skill that can be learned
[16:28] <LjL> did you
[16:29] <LjL> :\
[17:37] <topyli> @mark dondopa #ubuntu-offtopic rude pms
[17:38] <knome> topyli, wasn't too nice on #xubuntu-offtopic a while ago either
[17:39] <topyli> ok
[17:45] <Myrtti> I know it is a bit silly to suggest this
[17:45] <knome> not at all.
[17:46] <Myrtti> but maybe it could be considered to make ubottu ignore factoid requests from hsd1.ma.comcast.net?
[17:46] <Myrtti> since it seems like hostname based ignores would also work
[17:47] <IdleOne> ubottu: ignore *!*@*hsd1.ma.comcast.net
[17:47] <IdleOne> err in PM makes it a global ignore right?
[17:47] <IdleOne> there done
[17:48] <LjL> uh
[17:48]  * LjL shrugs
[17:48] <IdleOne> for q why you shrug?
[17:48] <IdleOne> s/q/k/
[17:51] <LjL> just thought ignoring all comcasts from massachussets was a bit akin to banning entire ranges, which i have thrown fits about for, uh, 7 years
[17:51] <LjL> but currently i'm still recharging from the last fit so i won't throw it
[17:52] <IdleOne> if you can suggest a more narrow mask that will affect less people?
[17:54] <LjL> IdleOne: i kinda can, yes, but that's besides the point even
[17:55] <LjL> and actually it's been the typical response every single time i've complained about this stuff
[17:55] <LjL> the THING is, you can't justify banning an entire unrelated group of people just because there doesn't seem to be a better way to keep a single individual, or a smaller group of troublesome ones, out
[17:55] <LjL> that's how IRCNet channels end up with *!*@*.it banned
[17:56] <LjL> anyway, just ban c-50*comcast
[17:56] <LjL> none of the people currently connected from MA Comcast have IPs starting with that
[17:56] <IdleOne> well if you can suggest a better ban mask that will avoid us having to ban an entire group because of a few individuals, please tell me.
[17:56] <LjL> while in my logs, he always did
[17:56] <LjL> i just did
[17:57] <LjL> i mean, of course it's unlikely to catch him every time
[17:57] <LjL> but you know what's most likely to always catch him - no false negatives?
[17:57] <LjL> *!*@*
[17:57] <LjL> maybe worth trying
[17:57] <IdleOne> so *!*@c-50*.comcast.met
[17:57] <LjL> no
[17:58] <LjL> that's even wider than the previous one
[17:58] <LjL> *!*@c-50-*hsd1.ma.comcast.net
[17:58] <IdleOne> ok
[17:58] <IdleOne> I unignored the first one I set
[17:59] <IdleOne> done
[17:59] <IdleOne> Thanks for the help :)
[18:45] <Myrtti> sorry, I was eating
[18:45] <Myrtti> I wasn't actually suggesting it should be done now
[18:46] <Myrtti> I was suggesting it to start conversation if it should be done
[18:55] <IdleOne> what is there to discuss really?
[19:15] <Pricey> DGJones: are you aware how easily that quiet may be avoided?
[19:16] <DJones> I know its easily avoided, but only needs to last about 1 minute
[19:19] <k1l_> honestly, he is evading every ban we set.
[19:19] <k1l_> so if we dont set real wide ban ranges we as ops cant do anything more
[19:49] <LjL> so don't
[19:49] <LjL> you're not really expected to fix just everything at just any cost
[19:56] <k1l_> we cant solve this problem. there has been several attempts to talk to him and to ban him on the other side. this is a freenode issue, imho (as long as staff thinks he is acting against their network policy)
[20:03] <LjL> yeah because freenode has a magic wand and can make effective bans where we can't
[20:04] <k1l_> they can send abuse files to the isp.
[21:28] <bazhang> * [CoBot-dev] (~CoBot-dev@unaffiliated/mrx/bot/cobot): CoBot/1.0 (Olivaw)
[21:29] <Pricey> Are you talking with another staffer about something? I have no idea what that's in reference to...
 at the moment it sends a /who to the channel and stores the data internally
[21:34] <bazhang> that ok?
[21:36] <Flannel> "at the moment" makes me leery.  If the sole purpose is just to harvest our users data, I'm not too keen on allowing it.
[21:37] <bazhang> I have him in PM at the moment; shall I ask him to remove it?
 (at the moment it can only process 1274 of the ~1700 users of the channel... i don't know why)<MRX> its just a test. it saves the GECOS only
[21:39] <Flannel> I was hoping some other folks would chime in here, but asking him to remove it gets my support.
[21:39] <bazhang> LjL, ? what say ye
[21:41] <IdleOne> don't we already publicly log that information about users ?
[21:43] <bazhang> shall I ask MRX t join here?
[21:43] <bazhang> +o
[21:43] <Flannel> IdleOne: No, logs don't have user info, just nicks.
[21:46] <Flannel> IdleOne: logs don't even have join/parts (I thought they did, but apparently not), just nick changes.
[21:47] <IdleOne> As long as he isn't publishing the info, and the bot stays quiet. I don't see the problem.
[22:00] <LjL> look it's not like any client can't do that just fine
[22:00] <LjL> i could be doing that and you'd never know unless i told you
[22:01] <LjL> do we really want to punish people for telling us things in order to play nice?
[22:01] <IdleOne> no
[22:02] <knome> Flannel, depends on the level of logging
[22:04] <Flannel> knome: Our official ones is what I was speaking of.
[22:04] <knome> aha. :)
 jmgk why are you private messaging me?    and then: jmgk> new to Ubuntu and this IRC thing
[23:31] <k1l_> @mark #ubuntu jmgk a user telling jmgk messaging him then jmgk says he is new to linux and irc