=== alpacaherder is now known as skellat === thomi_ is now known as thomi === rvba` is now known as rvba === cjwatson_ is now known as cjwatson === debfx_ is now known as debfx === doko_ is now known as doko [13:28] how can I copy src+binaries from archive to a ppa? [13:28] ah -b. === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha === Ursinha is now known as Guest48115 === Guest48115 is now known as Ursula === jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand [14:19] could someone move libkscreen and kscreen out of saucy-proposed? [14:19] the SRU has been verified as working [15:56] * stgraber does some SRU work [15:58] stgraber: KDE SC 4.11.3 can all be let in [15:58] dunno why that only got half in [16:02] Riddell: yeah, I'm looking into that one now (just had to re-read the MRE to refresh my memory) [16:07] stgraber: urgh, if you're going to let partman-{btrfs,ext3} in then we have to promote partman-basicfilesystems a bit early as well [16:07] oh, hey, look at that, it's not early for that any more [16:08] cjwatson: hmm, I thought I released partman-basicfilesystems at the same time too... let me check what happened there... [16:08] bleh, typo in my sru-release... [16:09] there, done again with basicfilesystems written properly this time around... [16:24] Riddell: I think I got them all [16:24] got to catch them all, it's like pokemon [16:25] :) [16:39] bdrung_: can you add some testing instructions to bug 1258639? [16:40] Launchpad bug 1258639 in update-manager (Ubuntu Quantal) "need to support upgrades from 12.10 to 13.10" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1258639 [16:40] bdrung_: sorry, meant bdmurray [16:52] bdmurray: can you add some testing instructions to bug 1258639? [16:52] Launchpad bug 1258639 in update-manager (Ubuntu Quantal) "need to support upgrades from 12.10 to 13.10" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1258639 [16:58] stgraber: done [16:58] bdmurray: thanks === Ursula is now known as Ursinha [19:43] got an issue with xubuntu dailies - we're now booting after the 'lightdm' issue - but we seem to have slipped back to menu layout from at least 2 releases ago - and the default language is bangla it appears [19:44] any ideas what the language issue should be reported against - I know the menu's is -default-settings [19:49] had to supply username and 'password' to get into live session as well [19:51] which image URL? I can take a look although probably tomorrow not today [19:52] cjwatson: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/daily-live/20131210/trusty-desktop-amd64.iso [19:52] apparently we've got a merge proposal waiting which should do the username [19:52] syncing, hopefully it'll be there for me tomorrow morning [19:53] but the language one I'm not sure which package to file it against [19:53] I would have thought the default language was more likely to be somewhere in the installer toolchain than in -default-settings [19:53] but I won't really be able to tell you until I can see it [19:53] k [19:53] or if you have a screenshot [19:54] cjwatson: of which issue :) [19:54] got it available in a vm at the moment [19:55] of the issue you're asking for help filing ... [19:55] i.e. the language one [19:59] ok [20:02] cjwatson: http://imagebin.org/281716 [20:03] cjwatson: is there a tool used by archive admins to check copyright besides licensecheck? [20:25] cjwatson: nvm - sorted it all now - or at least know what's happening, it's defaulting to xfce rather than xubuntu - explains a few issues [20:31] elfy: And that explains the Language as well? [20:32] I thought you said it did [21:06] cyphermox: licensecheck is it AFAIK [21:09] mmkay [21:09] I was in the hope there was some other magic trick [21:10] licensecheck is not *bad*, but still means a lot of manual intervention for this project I'm trying to review with robru [21:10] thanks! [21:23] cyphermox: licensecheck is a good first pass and then, yes, some manual poking. [21:24] infinity: then I just won't ruin the surprise for you :) [21:25] cyphermox: My favourite kind of NEW processing is "oh, good, it was already done by the Debian ftpmasters and then synced to Ubuntu, so I don't have to re-check". :P [21:25] *hint, hint* [21:25] haaha [21:25] maybe we'll keep that in mind [21:26] I don't know how much other cordova stuff has gone into debian yet [21:33] infinity, unfortunately this package is just tons of ubuntu-specific stuff and could never be accepted by debian. [21:34] infinity, like, it's specifically a tool for creating apps that can only run on the ubuntu phone [21:34] robru: how is it ubuntu-specific ? [21:35] cyphermox, in the sense that it integrates tightly with the ubuntu SDK? [21:37] oh, it does? [21:38] I thought it was more standalone and just used by it [21:39] cyphermox, well, I'm not super familiar with it, but it's specifically for phones. it's not like debian people are going to want this so they can run cordova apps on their servers. [21:40] I think, eventually, it would be great to see all our phone stuff genericised and in Debian, but I'd agree that today isn't that day. [21:55] robru: btw, I just noticed another piece with a license that may or may not be distributable, trying to check [22:00] robru: yeah, so it's not a clear-cut issue; see http://ftp-master.metadata.debian.org/changelogs/main/n/npm/unstable_changelog and http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2012/03/msg00021.html [22:00] npm has needed some (although minimal) changes to land in debian. [22:01] cyphermox, yeah, I'm a bit confused as to why this package is installing npm into itself, maybe we could rip that out if possible. not sure [22:02] yeah, that's possibly what I'd recommend [22:02] (removing it) [22:02] cyphermox, ok, still working on the deduplication [22:02] we'd already have it in distro anyway, it's not optimal, but then npm is full of contradictions w/r/t the license, if I strictly read the files I have [22:06] cyphermox, yeah [22:06] cyphermox, ok, just got this script to the point where it can create the flattened, versioned collection of nodules. now I just have to fill in the symlinks. but I really need to eat first, brb ;-)