[07:56] <dholbach> Guten Morgen Berlin! :)
[07:56] <dholbach> good morning
[09:30] <JamesTait> Good morning all; happy Poinsettia Day! :-D
[14:55] <dpm> hi mardy! I know we talked about this a few weeks ago, but I've been away for a couple of weeks too and I couldn't recall the status: are we at a stage that we can ship authentication plugins in click packages already? I'm thinking of the Evernote plugin, as right now we'd need to seed it to include in the images.
[14:57] <dpm> mzanetti, what's the status of the Evernote API plugin? I see you created a lot of branches that are pending review (I'll look into finding reviewers this week). Once those are merged, do you think we can call the plugin feature-complete, at least for the basic functions that we need for our client?
[14:58] <mzanetti> dpm: yes. I think once all that stuff is merged we have mostly everything a 1.0 release would need.
[14:58] <mzanetti> dpm: a no. it's lacking add/remove notebook methods
[14:59] <mzanetti> dpm: but I've planned to continue tonight with it
[14:59] <dpm> mzanetti, ack, thanks.
[14:59] <mzanetti> dpm: you would be a huge help if you would try out what I wrote in the description of the ssl branch
[14:59] <dpm> sounds great, thanks again for your help on this
[14:59] <dpm> mzanetti, ok, will look at that branch first
[15:00] <mzanetti> dpm: cool. I'll fix things from the reviews tonight and add the notebooks stuff.
[15:00] <dpm> rock on
[18:18] <vthompson> balloons, hey, hey, hey (I don't know why but I watched Fat Albert yesterday)
[18:19] <balloons> vthompson, :-p
[18:19] <balloons> ahayzen and I were working on the MP, and ready to land it.. They really want the fixes we put in. Glad you could swing by
[18:19] <vthompson> I think your idea of doing something similar to shuffle could be good
[18:19] <ahayzen> vthompson, o/
[18:19] <vthompson> We wouldn't want to repeat however.
[18:20] <balloons> vthompson, excellent. I'll make the changes now and you can review
[18:20] <vthompson> ahayzen, \o
[18:20] <balloons> I'm changing to test_next_previous and test_mp3 though
[18:20] <balloons> make sense?
[18:20] <vthompson> What are you going to do to ensure mp3 playback?
[18:21] <balloons> go through library until mp3 hits, then ensure it isplaying is true
[18:21] <balloons> can't do much more than that
[18:21] <balloons> unless you've an idea
[18:21] <vthompson> Ok, that works
[18:21] <vthompson> And the other test will just do a next followed by a previous?
[18:22] <ahayzen> balloons, how we checking it is mp3 just looking at the playing filename suffix?
[18:22] <balloons> yea.. check original, hit next, and toggle between them a couple times
[18:22] <balloons> ahayzen, we have 3 tracks as test data and we know TestMP3Title is an mp3, so ..
[18:22] <vthompson> Why would we toggle between them multiple times?
[18:23] <balloons> well not mutiple I suppose
[18:23] <balloons> just forward and then back
[18:24] <vthompson> cool, I agree with that
[18:25] <vthompson> And testing for mp3 playback probably won't be an exact science. Maybe just match that MP3 is in the metadata, as I put it there intentionally
[18:25] <vthompson> Or you could check the suffix somehow
[18:27] <ahayzen> vthompson, balloons, can u access mainView.currentFile cause then u can just do mainView.currentFile.endswith(".mp3") or something
[18:29] <daker> who can beat me? i can go 11years back with gallery-app :D http://i.imgur.com/DuQkcOA.png
[18:31] <vthompson> ahayzen, balloons Andrew's suggestion should work perfectly
[18:31] <balloons> vthompson, ahayzen ok, I'll add that
[18:40] <balloons> ok, done.. Now to add ahazyen's suggestion
[18:40] <ahayzen> balloons, :)
[18:40] <popey> daker: what's going on there?
[18:41] <daker> popey: two photos taken yesterday shows date "08 Dec 2002"
[18:41] <popey> interest, wonder where gallery gets the date from
[18:41] <popey> exif tags?
[18:42] <balloons> vthompson, ahayzen pushed.. have a look
[18:42] <daker> well they twice at the top with the correct date and at the bottom with the wrong date
[18:42] <ahayzen> balloons, i'll start the nexus :)
[18:42] <popey> gallery doesn't seem to scan photos in folders
[18:43] <balloons> one sec ahayzen .. pyflakes and pep8 checks too
[18:43] <balloons> le tme push those, hah!
[18:43] <ahayzen> balloons, :)
[18:44] <balloons> ahayzen, vthompson kk.. rev 281
[18:44] <daker> popey: ah that's it wrong date in the exif tags
[18:46] <popey> daker: because yes, I can beat those dates ☻  http://popey.com/~alan/phablet/device-2013-12-12-184620.png
[18:47] <daker> popey: but i did took the photos with camera-app
[18:47] <popey> ahh
[18:47] <daker> popey: it's not supposed to put wrong exiff tags
[18:48] <popey> maybe the date was wrong on your phone?
[18:48] <popey> I have seen that before
[18:48] <daker> popey: see http://paste.ubuntu.com/6562843/
[18:49] <daker> exif:DateTimeDigitized: 2002:12:08 12:00:00
[18:49] <daker> exif:DateTimeOriginal: 2002:12:08 12:00:00
[18:49] <popey> https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=42246
[18:49] <popey> upstream bug ㋛
[18:50] <daker> popey: you beat me :p
[18:50] <popey> ☻
[18:53] <vthompson> balloons, I added a comment. I think the mp3 test needs some fixing
[18:54] <balloons> vthompson, ahh well, you are right.. I should assert a failure on count too
[18:55] <vthompson> balloons, true--good call
[18:55] <ahayzen> balloons, i gtg, i'll test when i get back if it hasn't been approved by then :)
[18:55] <vthompson> ahayzen, thanks for helping!
[18:56] <ahayzen> np
[18:57] <balloons> so vthompson lots of ways to do this.. shall we stay consistent with shuffle and do a true loop?
[19:01] <vthompson> balloons, you mean only break the loop when a count is reached via "while True"?
[19:01] <vthompson> balloons, I think that'd make the conditions upon whether you pass/fail easier to accomplish
[19:02] <balloons> vthompson, yea, trying to keep failures clear
[19:09] <balloons> vthompson, pushing some changes.. the endswith check fails atm
[19:16] <vthompson> balloons, I'm looking now
[19:17] <balloons> mm.. lol I see the issue
[19:18] <balloons> k, fixing pep8 and pushing
[19:20] <balloons> vthompson, rev 285
[19:23] <vthompson> balloons, OK that looks good
[19:24] <vthompson> I wonder if it's worth trying to get the 3 we count too from the number of tracks in the queue
[19:24] <balloons> vthompson, yes.. if there is a good way, let's do it
[19:25] <vthompson> balloons, Carla added a function that does this get_queue_track_count
[19:26] <balloons> done, works
[19:27] <vthompson> balloons, and just one small thing about shuffle. We really should go back to a modest number of loops. 100 is excessive. 10 was what I originally had and allowed 1 in 1024 for a failure rate. Something like 20 makes the most sense
[19:28] <vthompson> balloons, but you don't need to change that if you don't want to
[19:28] <balloons> vthompson, ahh yes.. I don't like any possible failure when it could be incorrect
[19:29] <balloons> 100 is probably excessive, but ;-)
[19:29] <vthompson> balloons, Ok, then 100 is cool with me
[19:29] <balloons> ideally we would come up with something that didn't have a small percent chance to fail. anyways, for today, this is much better
[19:30] <vthompson> agreed
[19:39] <vthompson> balloons, looks good. Top approve when you want to
[19:40] <balloons> woo.. ty much vthompson
[19:40] <vthompson> balloons, np and nice work!