[09:28] <Guest81453> Good morning all; happy Day of Reconciliation! :-D
[09:47] <mzanetti> dpm: o/
[09:48] <dpm> morning mzanetti!
[09:48] <mzanetti> dpm: good morning. I've been quite busy with the reminders app on the weekend
[09:48] <mzanetti> check out the progress :) http://i.imgur.com/yeSEhiH.png
[09:49] <dpm> oh wow
[09:49] <mzanetti> dpm: having an issue with checkboxes
[09:49] <mzanetti> dpm: can't make them interactive :/
[09:50] <dpm> is this an html issue?
[09:50] <mzanetti> dpm: well, the TextEdit is not a WebView, but rather a textfield which happens to understand rich text. However, not <input> tags
[09:50] <mzanetti> dpm: so my suggestion would be to just paint them in the text as images and have an item in the toolbar "manage todo's"
[09:51] <mzanetti> dpm: opening that would open a list of real checkboxes where the user can mark them as done
[09:51] <mzanetti> dpm: once confirmed, the painted checkboxes in the text flow would update
[09:52] <mzanetti> (note that in ENML the checkboxes are not <input type="checkbox"> either, but rather <en-todo> tags
[09:53] <mzanetti> dpm: other issues are <subtext> and <supertext> which just get rendered as normal text and <hr/> (which just doesn't paint the line all).
[09:53] <dpm> mzanetti, sounds like a good workaround. But this might be something to take care of later on, what do you think? It seems TextEdit is showing more limitations. I know we had this conversation a while ago, but do you think in the future we should move to a WebView instead?
[09:53] <mzanetti> My vote goes to "just ignore those 2" ^^
[09:54] <mzanetti> dpm: no. you can't edit a webview
[09:54] <mzanetti> dpm: well, actually. we could use the webview when just viewing the note.
[09:54] <mzanetti> dpm: and only use the TextEdit for editing it. wouldn't be an issue to not being able to check/uncheck them in there
[09:54] <mzanetti> dpm: I'll give that a show
[09:55] <dpm> yeah, perhaps something like that. Use a WebView to show rich content and then a textview to edit in lo-fi mode :)
[09:55] <mzanetti> yeah. sounds like a plan. I'll check it out
[09:55] <mzanetti> dpm: I've also implemented the ux workflow...
[09:55] <mzanetti> dpm: which means. I've ran out of design :D need moar
[09:55] <dpm> awesome, that's a nice problem to have :)
[09:55] <mzanetti> dpm: latest branch comes pretty close to what we have in the wireframes
[09:56] <dpm> Sorry I didn't get to test anything on Friday, I'll spend some time with the Reminders app today and perhaps we can have a call later on
[09:56] <mzanetti> ok, sure
[13:27] <killer> hey , i accidently deleted source code of an app that was recently accepted in software center, can i download source code again from my ubunu developer account
[13:27] <Rory> killer: Is the source not on Launchpad?
[13:28] <Rory> killer: or github or wherever
[13:28] <killer> I submitted the app as proprietary
[13:32] <killer> :Rory
[13:33] <Rory> I actually know nothing about this, but hang around
[13:34] <oSoMoN> nerochiaro, hey, when you have a moment, could you review https://code.launchpad.net/~osomon/webbrowser-app/ping-test-server/+merge/199093 ?
[13:35] <nerochiaro> oSoMoN: ok
[13:37] <popey> killer: which app?
[13:38] <oSoMoN> nerochiaro, thx
[21:07] <balloons> nik90, ping
[23:50] <ahayzen> balloons, you around, no worries if ur not?
[23:51] <balloons> ahayzen, pong
[23:52] <ahayzen> balloons, firstly... I was wondering what we are doing regarding autopilot testing of infographics (i.e. do we need to be doing this, and if so how would we test this)?
[23:52] <balloons> ahayzen, meaning, art images, etc?
[23:52] <balloons> actual UI elements?
[23:52] <ahayzen> balloons, as in if a track is played for 10 seconds the infographics gets '1 song played today'
[23:53] <balloons> ahayzen, Ohh, right!
[23:53] <balloons> I'm not sure if the shell team has a test for that
[23:53] <ahayzen> balloons, cause i can see many code paths with different possibilities like when we pause/resume etc...we probably want to ensure we aren't getting double increments
[23:54] <balloons> ahayzen, right.. why don't you open a bug for this.. I'm liable to forget
[23:54] <ahayzen> balloons, it was just something we found when testing a MP and wondered if it was worth adding autopilot testing if even possible
[23:54] <ahayzen> balloons, ok under music-app?
[23:54] <balloons> ahayzen, anything is possible :-)
[23:54] <balloons> ahayzen, yes
[23:54] <ahayzen> balloons, cool..right second question... After discussions with Victor we came up with another test, I'm going to add bug, do I need to get them past you before I add the needs-autopilot-test tag?
[23:55] <ahayzen> balloons, and is it possible for a few tests to be run with no media on the device? cause we need to test empty library states
[23:55] <balloons> ahayzen, what do you mean? if you want to file a bug that needs a test (is it a featurE?
[23:55] <balloons> ahayzen, yes, we can setup an empty media lib
[23:56] <ahayzen> balloons, we think we want a test for empty library state so I add a bug and add the needs-autopilot-test?
[23:56] <ahayzen> balloons, i didn't know if i needed to get authorization from u for the tag to get it prioritized?
[23:59] <balloons> ahayzen, no, no need to ask permission :-) However, letting me know is a good idea
[23:59] <balloons> I might not see it right away
[23:59] <ahayzen> balloons, cool thanks
[23:59] <balloons> but yes, open bugs, add the tag, let me know :-) all good things
[23:59] <ahayzen> balloons, last thing ...is Jenkins now back up and running?