[02:36] <rsalveti> infinity: if still around, could you approve the android-headers binary package?
[02:37] <infinity> rsalveti: Looks good, accepting.  Thanks for the fix.
[02:37] <rsalveti> infinity: awesome, thanks
[10:18] <Mirv> seb128 preNEW reviewed properties-cpp on Friday
[13:40] <rsalveti> infinity: mind checking bug 1261393 as well? this is needed so we can update libhybris
[13:40] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1261393 in android-headers (Ubuntu) "[MIR] Inclusion of android-headers in main" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1261393
[13:48] <infinity> rsalveti: If it was already in main, it doesn't need an MIR.
[13:49] <rsalveti> infinity: the previous package was already in main
[13:49] <rsalveti> as it's not a 100% replacement, I thought we'd need a mir
[13:50] <infinity> rsalveti: Close enough.
[13:51] <infinity> rsalveti: Done.
[13:51] <rsalveti> infinity: great, thanks!
[15:06] <lool> Hey
[15:06] <ogra_> lool, we shouoldnt build it on ppc
[15:06] <ogra_> (android-headers that is)
[15:08] <rsalveti> ogra_: android-headers is all
[15:08] <lool> I think we have to hint libhybris in
[15:08] <lool> rsalveti: checking status of android-headers
[15:09] <ogra_> rsalveti, well, we might want to limit it ... there is nothing to use them with on ppc
[15:09] <lool> it was renamed
[15:09] <lool> rsalveti: problem is that the binary package name changed
[15:09] <lool> so we have to remove  android-platform-headers | 0.1.0+git20130606+c5d897a-0ubuntu37 | trusty | all
[15:09] <rsalveti> right, that was dropped with latest libhybris indeed
[15:10] <lool> rsalveti: was this pulled on developers' systems?  do we need some transition path?
[15:10] <lool> like a transition package
[15:10] <rsalveti> lool: nops
[15:11] <lool> I see android-headers conflicts/replaces it so I guess it's alright if it was only used in bdeps
[15:11] <rsalveti> yup
[15:11] <lool> I guess we need archive admin to remove the old name
[15:11] <lool> then libhybris can go in
[15:12] <rsalveti> lool: I don't get why it's saying it's out-of-date for arm64/powerpc/ppc64el
[15:16]  * cjwatson looks at this android-headers/libhybris thing
[15:16] <cjwatson> right, that arch list corresponds to the arches not built by the new libhybrid
[15:16] <cjwatson> *libhybris
[15:16] <rsalveti> right
[15:17] <lool> but it's the same as before
[15:17] <cjwatson> so it's effectively NBS, but I think one of the corner cases that doesn't show up in that report
[15:17] <cjwatson> lool: the android-platform-headers package was dropped
[15:18] <lool> it was arch all and was dropped entirely
[15:18] <cjwatson> indeed, but there's no publication to supersede it on those architectures
[15:18] <cjwatson> anyway, I'll deal with it
[15:19] <lool> so britney did see android-headers was superseding android-platform-headers via Conflicts/Replaces somehow?  but that's arch: all too
[15:19] <cjwatson> no no no  no no
[15:19] <cjwatson> nothing to do with c/r or superseding or anything
[15:19] <cjwatson> it's just NBS
[15:19] <cjwatson> I've removed it from trusty, should clear itself up in a cycle or two
[15:20] <lool> great, thanks
[22:58] <xnox_> yeah \o/ asterisk 11 =)
[22:58] <xnox_> it better drop sqlite2 =)