[10:27] <snadge> [ 5719.809041] do_general_protection: 168 callbacks suppressed
[10:27] <snadge> [ 5719.809049] traps: hexchat[3980] general protection ip:7fb148cf391c sp:7fff0ac716e8 error:0 in libc-2.17.so[7fb148c70000+1bd000]
[10:28] <snadge> i keep seeing errors in libc on saucy
[10:28] <snadge> i did a full memory test.. it passes
[10:28] <snadge> its usually xchat.. but sometimes its chrome and firefox as well
[11:59] <hjd> Could someone please mark bug 1261600 as Triaged/High? (While it is sorta possible to workaround and start a new game, it appears rather broken.)
[11:59] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1261600 in gnome-sudoku (Ubuntu) "Window for Sudoku "New Game" is about 30 px high and can't be enlarged (Trusty)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1261600
[14:58] <Wubix> hello everyone
[14:59] <Wubix> it is possible to start bug reporting for 14.04, right?
[15:01] <hggdh> Wubix: yes, it is
[15:04] <Wubix> e.g. for the package yum there are 2 main problems at first. for "yum update" one receives a lot of errors. and the repository list is empty
[15:04] <Wubix> do i file 2 seperate bugs for this?
[15:05] <hggdh> yum?
[15:05] <Wubix> yes
[15:05] <hggdh> are you sure you are trying Ubuntu? We do not use yum
[15:06] <Wubix> i am sure that i use ubuntu 14.04 and i am sure that i installed yum via apt-get
[15:06] <Wubix> i plan to use it to create a chroot
 OK. One bug for each issue, one issue per bug
[15:07] <Wubix> ah, ok
[15:07] <hggdh> please bear in mind that yum is in Universe -- which means it depends on the MOTU folks
[15:08] <hggdh> although I still fail to see the advantage in using an external, non-supported, package manager...
[15:09] <Wubix> you know what a chroot is, right?
[15:09] <hggdh> yes, I do
[15:10] <Wubix> how would you create it if you had no "yum --installroot=/redhat ..." available?
[15:13] <hggdh> well, I do not know, since I do not know what the above command does
[15:13] <Wubix> ok, ok
[15:13] <hggdh> but it is probable that pbuilder would do something similar
[15:14] <Wubix> pbuilder? would install a function chroot of fedora or centos packages?
[15:14] <hggdh> I doubt
[15:15] <hggdh> as much as I doubt that a chroot of RH in a Debian/Ubuntu environment would give you the RH kernel
[17:44] <thilo> Hi, I think I found a bug in firefox (a regression since version 26). Should I create a bug report in launchpad or at mozilla.org?
[18:46] <hggdh> thilo: you can do both; upstream will guarantee it will be looked at & eventually fixed, locally it will have a pointer to upstream
[19:18] <TheLordOfTime> oh thank god i can finally tell people to leave me alone about this bug...
[19:20] <TheLordOfTime> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+bug/1216817
[19:20] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1216817 in nginx (Ubuntu) "Using `fastcgi_cache` or `proxy_cache` with nginx-extras causes the push module to throw errors." [Low,Triaged]
[19:20] <TheLordOfTime> that's been plaguing me for a while now with people saying "This is broken!"
[19:20] <TheLordOfTime> hggdh, have you ever seen users nagging people about "THIS IS BROKEN!!!!!!!" and ultimately you can't do anything but upstream can?
[19:20] <TheLordOfTime> because that's me right now :/
[19:21] <hggdh> yeah, been there...
[19:22] <hggdh> when on IRC I usually tell them to go comment upstream; on LP it is just noise
[19:22] <TheLordOfTime> hggdh, at least i can tell them all "LISTEN!  It's out of my hands, Debian has to fix it first."
[19:22] <hggdh> heh\
[19:22] <TheLordOfTime> hggdh, upstream nginx doesn't care, but in Debian they do, i spent three hours replicating the bug in Debian Unstable
[19:22] <TheLordOfTime> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=732251 was the bug I filed, but I also talked with nginx debian so they were also able to replicate...
[19:22] <ubot2`> Debian bug 732251 in nginx-extras "nginx-extras fastcgi_cache and proxy_cache both trigger errors with the push module" [Minor,Open]
[19:23] <TheLordOfTime> thank god that i don't have to debug the module in the program now >.>
[19:23] <hggdh> well, keep in mind that Debian is upstream for most of our stuff... but, in this case, we try to help them out ;-)
[19:23] <TheLordOfTime> indeed
[19:23] <hggdh> as you did, in factr
[19:23] <TheLordOfTime> mhm
[19:23] <hggdh> fact*
[19:24] <TheLordOfTime> hggdh, well, I suspected it was a debian-affected issue too
[19:24] <hggdh> was it?
[19:24] <TheLordOfTime> because there're reports of 1.1.19 in ubuntu... and 1.4.4 in trusty
[19:24] <TheLordOfTime> mhm
[19:24] <TheLordOfTime> especially with it being 1.4.4 in trusty being able to replicate, that was recently merged in from Debian for CVE fixes
[19:24] <TheLordOfTime> and the only delta we have is a version string change to add "Ubuntu"
[19:25] <TheLordOfTime> (in the program)
[19:25] <hggdh> oh, BTW, you should be able to say debian bug 732251
[19:25] <ubot2`> Debian bug 732251 in nginx-extras "nginx-extras fastcgi_cache and proxy_cache both trigger errors with the push module" [Minor,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/732251
[19:25] <hggdh> heh
[19:25] <TheLordOfTime> indeed
[19:25] <TheLordOfTime> but i didn't remember the bug number offhand
[19:25] <TheLordOfTime> i just pasted the link because it was there.
[19:25] <hggdh> brb, meeting
[19:25] <TheLordOfTime> kk