=== pgraner` is now known as pgraner === zequence_ is now known as zequence [10:27] [ 5719.809041] do_general_protection: 168 callbacks suppressed [10:27] [ 5719.809049] traps: hexchat[3980] general protection ip:7fb148cf391c sp:7fff0ac716e8 error:0 in libc-2.17.so[7fb148c70000+1bd000] [10:28] i keep seeing errors in libc on saucy [10:28] i did a full memory test.. it passes [10:28] its usually xchat.. but sometimes its chrome and firefox as well === xnox_ is now known as xnox [11:59] Could someone please mark bug 1261600 as Triaged/High? (While it is sorta possible to workaround and start a new game, it appears rather broken.) [11:59] Launchpad bug 1261600 in gnome-sudoku (Ubuntu) "Window for Sudoku "New Game" is about 30 px high and can't be enlarged (Trusty)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1261600 [14:58] hello everyone [14:59] it is possible to start bug reporting for 14.04, right? [15:01] Wubix: yes, it is [15:04] e.g. for the package yum there are 2 main problems at first. for "yum update" one receives a lot of errors. and the repository list is empty [15:04] do i file 2 seperate bugs for this? [15:05] yum? [15:05] yes [15:05] are you sure you are trying Ubuntu? We do not use yum [15:06] i am sure that i use ubuntu 14.04 and i am sure that i installed yum via apt-get [15:06] i plan to use it to create a chroot [15:06] OK. One bug for each issue, one issue per bug [15:07] ah, ok [15:07] please bear in mind that yum is in Universe -- which means it depends on the MOTU folks [15:08] although I still fail to see the advantage in using an external, non-supported, package manager... [15:09] you know what a chroot is, right? [15:09] yes, I do [15:10] how would you create it if you had no "yum --installroot=/redhat ..." available? [15:13] well, I do not know, since I do not know what the above command does [15:13] ok, ok [15:13] but it is probable that pbuilder would do something similar [15:14] pbuilder? would install a function chroot of fedora or centos packages? [15:14] I doubt [15:15] as much as I doubt that a chroot of RH in a Debian/Ubuntu environment would give you the RH kernel === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha === shadeslayer_ is now known as shadeslayer [17:44] Hi, I think I found a bug in firefox (a regression since version 26). Should I create a bug report in launchpad or at mozilla.org? [18:46] thilo: you can do both; upstream will guarantee it will be looked at & eventually fixed, locally it will have a pointer to upstream === j_f-f_ is now known as j_f-f [19:18] oh thank god i can finally tell people to leave me alone about this bug... [19:20] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+bug/1216817 [19:20] Launchpad bug 1216817 in nginx (Ubuntu) "Using `fastcgi_cache` or `proxy_cache` with nginx-extras causes the push module to throw errors." [Low,Triaged] [19:20] that's been plaguing me for a while now with people saying "This is broken!" [19:20] hggdh, have you ever seen users nagging people about "THIS IS BROKEN!!!!!!!" and ultimately you can't do anything but upstream can? [19:20] because that's me right now :/ [19:21] yeah, been there... [19:22] when on IRC I usually tell them to go comment upstream; on LP it is just noise [19:22] hggdh, at least i can tell them all "LISTEN! It's out of my hands, Debian has to fix it first." [19:22] heh\ [19:22] hggdh, upstream nginx doesn't care, but in Debian they do, i spent three hours replicating the bug in Debian Unstable [19:22] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=732251 was the bug I filed, but I also talked with nginx debian so they were also able to replicate... [19:22] Debian bug 732251 in nginx-extras "nginx-extras fastcgi_cache and proxy_cache both trigger errors with the push module" [Minor,Open] [19:23] thank god that i don't have to debug the module in the program now >.> [19:23] well, keep in mind that Debian is upstream for most of our stuff... but, in this case, we try to help them out ;-) [19:23] indeed [19:23] as you did, in factr [19:23] mhm [19:23] fact* [19:24] hggdh, well, I suspected it was a debian-affected issue too [19:24] was it? [19:24] because there're reports of 1.1.19 in ubuntu... and 1.4.4 in trusty [19:24] mhm [19:24] especially with it being 1.4.4 in trusty being able to replicate, that was recently merged in from Debian for CVE fixes [19:24] and the only delta we have is a version string change to add "Ubuntu" [19:25] (in the program) [19:25] oh, BTW, you should be able to say debian bug 732251 [19:25] Debian bug 732251 in nginx-extras "nginx-extras fastcgi_cache and proxy_cache both trigger errors with the push module" [Minor,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/732251 [19:25] heh [19:25] indeed [19:25] but i didn't remember the bug number offhand [19:25] i just pasted the link because it was there. [19:25] brb, meeting [19:25] kk === Noskcaj10 is now known as Noskcaj === Logan_ is now known as Guest47136 === Logan__ is now known as Logan_