| === freeflying_away is now known as freeflying | ||
| xnox | cjwatson: yeap, that did it. | 01:45 |
|---|---|---|
| shuduo | hi, anyone know where is right channel to discuss Ubuntu SDK issue if not here? | 04:06 |
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === doko_ is now known as doko | ||
| === tvoss|dinner is now known as tvoss | ||
| === xPucTu4 is now known as Guest50162 | ||
| === Guest50162 is now known as xPucTu4 | ||
| === alkisg is now known as work_alkisg | ||
| === ev_ is now known as ev | ||
| xnox | shuduo: typically #ubuntu-touch and/or #ubuntu-app-devel. But do note it's coming up to hollidays seasons. | 09:32 |
| xnox | shuduo: if no answer on irc, email ubuntu-phone mailing list (plenty of sdk questions answered) and/or file bugs on launchpad. | 09:33 |
| shuduo | xnox: thanks. i aleady file a bug to website since they are different. but i can't find where to file bug for ubuntu-sdk | 09:34 |
| xnox | shuduo: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bugs is a good starting place. | 09:35 |
| shuduo | xnox: in theory ubuntu-sdk don't provide scope template is not fault of ubunt-touch ;) | 09:35 |
| xnox | shuduo: ah, templates are part of the qtcreator ubuntu plugin. | 09:35 |
| shuduo | xnox: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1263593 already also affect ubuntu-ui-toolkit | 09:40 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 1263593 in Ubuntu App Developer site "new Ubuntu SDK (Qt Creator 2.8.1) don't have unity scope project" [Undecided,New] | 09:40 |
| xnox | shuduo: tweaked, moved to qtcreator-plugin-ubuntu project. | 09:41 |
| xnox | shuduo: thanks =) | 09:41 |
| shuduo | xnox: great. thanks. | 09:42 |
| mlankhorst | ok I finished up the xorg lts-saucy stack preparations :P | 11:58 |
| === apachelogger is now known as AgentA | ||
| mardy | cjwatson: hi! Can I use the "Exec" field of a click hook to perform some checks and optionally return an error to prevent the installation of the click package? | 12:09 |
| === AgentA is now known as apachelogger | ||
| Laney | xnox: will look at some point | 12:33 |
| Laney | christmas shenanigans | 12:33 |
| xnox | Laney: all fixed now, i think. | 12:34 |
| xnox | Laney: merry xmas ;-) | 12:34 |
| cjwatson | mardy: You can't prevent installation as such, because Exec hooks necessarily run after the package has been unpacked | 12:35 |
| cjwatson | mardy: If the command named in the Exec field of a hook returns non-zero then click will raise an exception | 12:36 |
| cjwatson | mardy: We could debate whether something in the stack should remove the package again in that event, I suppose (though what if the hook still fails?) | 12:37 |
| mardy | cjwatson: right, and I actually figured out that I don't need that; I was worried that a click package could install an Online Account plugin in ~/.local/... which would obscure a system plugin, but then realized that it will always have the click ID as namespace | 12:37 |
| cjwatson | mardy: Right, that's a better answer indeed | 12:38 |
| cjwatson | mardy: I'd be open to defining some other type of hook for pre-installation checks, but I'd prefer to do so in response to a need that isn't satisfied some other way so that I know we're designing it right :-) | 12:38 |
| mardy | cjwatson: absolutely | 12:39 |
| mardy | cjwatson: about bug 1245826, would you like me to work on that? | 12:40 |
| ubottu | bug 1245826 in click (Ubuntu) "Allow applying a hook to multiple files" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1245826 | 12:40 |
| cjwatson | mardy: oh, sure, if you like | 12:42 |
| cjwatson | mardy: just make sure you include a doc update and tests | 12:42 |
| mardy | cjwatson: OK, it's not my top priority ATM, but it might become it. :-) If/when I start working on it, I'll assign the bug to myself | 12:43 |
| mlankhorst | cjwatson: well lts-saucy stack in NEW soon :P | 12:43 |
| mlankhorst | who's doing 12.04.4 this time? | 12:44 |
| === sraue_ is now known as sraue | ||
| === freeflying is now known as freeflying_away | ||
| caribou | what should be done when a FTBS on trusty-proposed is caused by a FTBS issue on Debian/sid ? | 15:46 |
| caribou | the FTBS in question is seabios 1.7.3-3 | 15:46 |
| cjwatson | no different from any other cause | 15:47 |
| cjwatson | just make sure to forward the fix to Debian | 15:47 |
| caribou | cjwatson: it doesn't build on Sid because of the version of iasl that doesn't fit with seabios | 15:48 |
| caribou | cjwatson: see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707454 | 15:48 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 707454 in src:seabios "seabios: FTBFS: src/acpi.c:489:14: error: 'ssdt_pcihp_name' undeclared (first use in this function)" [Serious,Open] | 15:48 |
| caribou | cjwatson: last comment on the bug is that it will not build on Sid either | 15:49 |
| cjwatson | caribou: I don't have any special expertise in this package, so no point telling me the details :) | 15:57 |
| cjwatson | if you don't know how to fix it then you can always leave it for the Debian maintainer | 15:58 |
| caribou | cjwatson: it was not specific to the package itself, but what do Ubuntu does whenit import a package that is FTBS on Debian as well ? | 15:58 |
| caribou | cjwatson: but that's fine, I'll let it up to the DM to fix | 15:59 |
| cjwatson | caribou: it FTBFS until somebody fixes it ... | 15:59 |
| cjwatson | caribou: there's really nothing special about the *reason* for the FTBFS here | 15:59 |
| cjwatson | caribou: it'll generally sit unmigrated in trusty-proposed | 15:59 |
| cjwatson | as indeed I see is happening here | 15:59 |
| caribou | cjwatson: ah, ok, that was my question | 15:59 |
| caribou | cjwatson: thanks for the answer | 16:00 |
| zyga | hi, is it possible to sync from debian NEW into ubuntu? | 16:43 |
| cjwatson | No | 16:44 |
| cjwatson | Because the files in NEW aren't publicly available | 16:45 |
| zyga | ah, ok | 16:45 |
| cjwatson | You can reupload manually if you have them, but it can be faster to just wait ... once ftpmaster processes something it'll be auto-synced without intervention, whereas manual uploads require manual attention from the Ubuntu side | 16:46 |
| cjwatson | So it depends whether you think Debian ftpmasters or Ubuntu AAs will be faster :) | 16:46 |
| * zyga wonders if he should wait $random amount of time for NEW to get processed or should he continue the motu path to get that package into ubuntu first | 16:46 | |
| cjwatson | Over the Christmas break I'd bet on the former if I were you | 16:46 |
| zyga | cjwatson: I have no experience with either TBH :) | 16:46 |
| cjwatson | Ubuntu NEW can be fairly random too for source uploads ... | 16:47 |
| zyga | cjwatson: is a package going to be in NEW after each upload or just the initial release into debian? | 16:47 |
| cjwatson | NEW means "package of that name not currently in that suite" | 16:48 |
| zyga | ah, I see | 16:48 |
| cjwatson | So you generally only hit it once per package unless you're backporting | 16:48 |
| zyga | so subsequent updates should be fairly quickly, as in, sponsor-fast | 16:48 |
| cjwatson | Yes | 16:48 |
| === lfaraone_ is now known as lfaraone | ||
| cjwatson | hmph, python-numpy fails to build with python3.4 in python3-defaults | 18:21 |
| cjwatson | I think I shall finish for the day (and year) rather than investigating :) | 18:21 |
| === henrix_ is now known as henrix | ||
| xnox | ev: as much as we like to have a package that only builds on arm64 & ppc64el and fails elsewhere, I'm disabling valgrind across the board. Looks like it's reporting unrelated leakage or somesuch with new gtk3.10. This has been noticed across other #ps projects, so until that is fixed / valgrind filtered the build will run without valgrind. | 20:17 |
| xnox | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/whoopsie/0.2.24.2 | 20:17 |
| Logan_ | xnox: Did you get my email? | 20:19 |
| xnox | Logan_: yeah, it's all fixed =) | 20:20 |
| xnox | Logan_: check out the hdf5 upload. | 20:20 |
| xnox | (diff) | 20:20 |
| Logan_ | xnox: Oh sweet. Why was it disabled? | 20:20 |
| xnox | Logan_: not only openmpi is arch restricted in debian/control, it was further "building empty package" in the debian/rules. | 20:20 |
| xnox | Logan_: i presume the packager didn't spend time to filter and dynamically detect which backend default mpi is using & dynamically check if it's openmpi. Instead it got hard-coded twice..... | 20:21 |
| Logan_ | Okay. That whole thing is a mess, honestly. | 20:22 |
| === deryck_ is now known as deryck | ||
| === freeflying_away is now known as freeflying | ||
| xnox | ev: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/whoopsie/0.2.24.3 that is. | 21:02 |
| xnox | Logan_: yeah. =) | 21:02 |
| xnox | Logan_: similarly, if you expand http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/openmpi1.6.html to include "good" you will notice how plenty of projects are not linking against openmpi on arm64/ppc64el. Sometimes it's because debian/rules and/or debian/control were restricted in a similar manner to hdf5, other-times it simply needs a no-change rebuild..... =) | 21:03 |
| * xnox *hides* | 21:04 | |
| === freeflying is now known as freeflying_away | ||
| melodie | hello! | 22:01 |
| melodie | I try to improve a remix I am working on. I have an issue with the integrity-check stanza. Where should I look to find what to fix? | 22:02 |
| melodie | does someone know what triggers the integrity-check stanza in a live iso? | 22:30 |
| === freeflying_away is now known as freeflying | ||
| === funkyHat_ is now known as funkyHat | ||
| slangasek | wow, schadenfreude. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/base-files/+bug/1263672 | 23:01 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 1263672 in base-files (Ubuntu) "package base-files 6.5ubuntu6.6 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: pre-dependency problem - not installing base-files" [Undecided,New] | 23:01 |
| infinity | slangasek: I have so many questions about that upgrade log... | 23:44 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!