/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2013/12/23/#ubuntu-devel.txt

=== freeflying_away is now known as freeflying
xnoxcjwatson: yeap, that did it.01:45
shuduohi, anyone know where is right channel to discuss Ubuntu SDK issue if not here?04:06
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
=== doko_ is now known as doko
=== tvoss|dinner is now known as tvoss
=== xPucTu4 is now known as Guest50162
=== Guest50162 is now known as xPucTu4
=== alkisg is now known as work_alkisg
=== ev_ is now known as ev
xnoxshuduo: typically #ubuntu-touch and/or #ubuntu-app-devel. But do note it's coming up to hollidays seasons.09:32
xnoxshuduo: if no answer on irc, email ubuntu-phone mailing list (plenty of sdk questions answered) and/or file bugs on launchpad.09:33
shuduoxnox: thanks. i aleady file a bug to website since they are different. but i can't find where to file bug for ubuntu-sdk09:34
xnoxshuduo: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bugs is a good starting place.09:35
shuduoxnox: in theory ubuntu-sdk don't provide scope template is not fault of ubunt-touch ;)09:35
xnoxshuduo: ah, templates are part of the qtcreator ubuntu plugin.09:35
shuduoxnox: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1263593 already also affect ubuntu-ui-toolkit09:40
ubottuUbuntu bug 1263593 in Ubuntu App Developer site "new Ubuntu SDK (Qt Creator 2.8.1) don't have unity scope project" [Undecided,New]09:40
xnoxshuduo: tweaked, moved to qtcreator-plugin-ubuntu project.09:41
xnoxshuduo: thanks =)09:41
shuduoxnox: great. thanks.09:42
mlankhorstok I finished up the xorg lts-saucy stack preparations :P11:58
=== apachelogger is now known as AgentA
mardycjwatson: hi! Can I use the "Exec" field of a click hook to perform some checks and optionally return an error to prevent the installation of the click package?12:09
=== AgentA is now known as apachelogger
Laneyxnox: will look at some point12:33
Laneychristmas shenanigans12:33
xnoxLaney: all fixed now, i think.12:34
xnoxLaney: merry xmas ;-)12:34
cjwatsonmardy: You can't prevent installation as such, because Exec hooks necessarily run after the package has been unpacked12:35
cjwatsonmardy: If the command named in the Exec field of a hook returns non-zero then click will raise an exception12:36
cjwatsonmardy: We could debate whether something in the stack should remove the package again in that event, I suppose (though what if the hook still fails?)12:37
mardycjwatson: right, and I actually figured out that I don't need that; I was worried that a click package could install an Online Account plugin in ~/.local/... which would obscure a system plugin, but then realized that it will always have the click ID as namespace12:37
cjwatsonmardy: Right, that's a better answer indeed12:38
cjwatsonmardy: I'd be open to defining some other type of hook for pre-installation checks, but I'd prefer to do so in response to a need that isn't satisfied some other way so that I know we're designing it right :-)12:38
mardycjwatson: absolutely12:39
mardycjwatson: about bug 1245826, would you like me to work on that?12:40
ubottubug 1245826 in click (Ubuntu) "Allow applying a hook to multiple files" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/124582612:40
cjwatsonmardy: oh, sure, if you like12:42
cjwatsonmardy: just make sure you include a doc update and tests12:42
mardycjwatson: OK, it's not my top priority ATM, but it might become it. :-) If/when I start working on it, I'll assign the bug to myself12:43
mlankhorstcjwatson: well lts-saucy stack in NEW soon :P12:43
mlankhorstwho's doing 12.04.4 this time?12:44
=== sraue_ is now known as sraue
=== freeflying is now known as freeflying_away
caribouwhat should be done when a FTBS on trusty-proposed is caused by a FTBS issue on Debian/sid ?15:46
caribouthe FTBS in question is seabios 1.7.3-315:46
cjwatsonno different from any other cause15:47
cjwatsonjust make sure to forward the fix to Debian15:47
cariboucjwatson: it doesn't build on Sid because of the version of iasl that doesn't fit with seabios15:48
cariboucjwatson: see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=70745415:48
ubottuDebian bug 707454 in src:seabios "seabios: FTBFS: src/acpi.c:489:14: error: 'ssdt_pcihp_name' undeclared (first use in this function)" [Serious,Open]15:48
cariboucjwatson: last comment on the bug is that it will not build on Sid either15:49
cjwatsoncaribou: I don't have any special expertise in this package, so no point telling me the details :)15:57
cjwatsonif you don't know how to fix it then you can always leave it for the Debian maintainer15:58
cariboucjwatson: it was not specific to the package itself, but what do Ubuntu does whenit import a package that is FTBS on Debian as well ?15:58
cariboucjwatson: but that's fine, I'll let it up to the DM to fix15:59
cjwatsoncaribou: it FTBFS until somebody fixes it ...15:59
cjwatsoncaribou: there's really nothing special about the *reason* for the FTBFS here15:59
cjwatsoncaribou: it'll generally sit unmigrated in trusty-proposed15:59
cjwatsonas indeed I see is happening here15:59
cariboucjwatson: ah, ok, that was my question15:59
cariboucjwatson: thanks for the answer16:00
zygahi, is it possible to sync from debian NEW into ubuntu?16:43
cjwatsonNo16:44
cjwatsonBecause the files in NEW aren't publicly available16:45
zygaah, ok16:45
cjwatsonYou can reupload manually if you have them, but it can be faster to just wait ... once ftpmaster processes something it'll be auto-synced without intervention, whereas manual uploads require manual attention from the Ubuntu side16:46
cjwatsonSo it depends whether you think Debian ftpmasters or Ubuntu AAs will be faster :)16:46
* zyga wonders if he should wait $random amount of time for NEW to get processed or should he continue the motu path to get that package into ubuntu first16:46
cjwatsonOver the Christmas break I'd bet on the former if I were you16:46
zygacjwatson: I have no experience with either TBH :)16:46
cjwatsonUbuntu NEW can be fairly random too for source uploads ...16:47
zygacjwatson: is a package going to be in NEW after each upload or just the initial release into debian?16:47
cjwatsonNEW means "package of that name not currently in that suite"16:48
zygaah, I see16:48
cjwatsonSo you generally only hit it once per package unless you're backporting16:48
zygaso subsequent updates should be fairly quickly, as in, sponsor-fast16:48
cjwatsonYes16:48
=== lfaraone_ is now known as lfaraone
cjwatsonhmph, python-numpy fails to build with python3.4 in python3-defaults18:21
cjwatsonI think I shall finish for the day (and year) rather than investigating :)18:21
=== henrix_ is now known as henrix
xnoxev: as much as we like to have a package that only builds on arm64 & ppc64el and fails elsewhere, I'm disabling valgrind across the board. Looks like it's reporting unrelated leakage or somesuch with new gtk3.10. This has been noticed across other #ps projects, so until that is fixed / valgrind filtered the build will run without valgrind.20:17
xnoxhttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/whoopsie/0.2.24.220:17
Logan_xnox: Did you get my email?20:19
xnoxLogan_: yeah, it's all fixed =)20:20
xnoxLogan_: check out the hdf5 upload.20:20
xnox(diff)20:20
Logan_xnox: Oh sweet. Why was it disabled?20:20
xnoxLogan_: not only openmpi is arch restricted in debian/control, it was further "building empty package" in the debian/rules.20:20
xnoxLogan_: i presume the packager didn't spend time to filter and dynamically detect which backend default mpi is using & dynamically check if it's openmpi. Instead it got hard-coded twice.....20:21
Logan_Okay. That whole thing is a mess, honestly.20:22
=== deryck_ is now known as deryck
=== freeflying_away is now known as freeflying
xnoxev: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/whoopsie/0.2.24.3 that is.21:02
xnoxLogan_: yeah. =)21:02
xnoxLogan_: similarly, if you expand http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/openmpi1.6.html to include "good" you will notice how plenty of projects are not linking against openmpi on arm64/ppc64el. Sometimes it's because debian/rules and/or debian/control were restricted in a similar manner to hdf5, other-times it simply needs a no-change rebuild..... =)21:03
* xnox *hides*21:04
=== freeflying is now known as freeflying_away
melodiehello!22:01
melodieI try to improve a remix I am working on. I have an issue with the integrity-check stanza. Where should I look to find what to fix?22:02
melodiedoes someone know what triggers the integrity-check stanza in a live iso?22:30
=== freeflying_away is now known as freeflying
=== funkyHat_ is now known as funkyHat
slangasekwow, schadenfreude. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/base-files/+bug/126367223:01
ubottuUbuntu bug 1263672 in base-files (Ubuntu) "package base-files 6.5ubuntu6.6 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: pre-dependency problem - not installing base-files" [Undecided,New]23:01
infinityslangasek: I have so many questions about that upgrade log...23:44

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!