[01:35] <IdleOne> LjL: the ability to mute or ban a user across 50-60...100 channels in one command would be useful to a large project like ubuntu with many channels
[01:36] <LjL> IdleOne: i don't see how that's something that should be handled by freenode though, if we could put our shit together we could just do it themselves, and that's the reasonable way to handle it... but anyway in patrick's particular case, that wouldn't really do any good. most of the people who cause issues in so many places can bypass bans/k-lines
[01:36] <LjL> IdleOne: there are probably some cases where that could be useful
[01:37] <LjL> IdleOne: but you don't really need it to be able to do 100 channels
[01:37] <LjL> IdleOne: i'm only in 70 or so, maybe 80
[01:38] <IdleOne> having chanserv be able to do that would be restricted to users with the appropriate flags set not on the channel, but on the namespace (the namespace would have to act sorta like a user account ?)
[01:38] <Unit193> Loco channels would be pretty pointless to hit, as some team channels that I've never seen a ban take place.
[01:38] <IdleOne> so you wouldn't need to be in all the channels
[01:39] <IdleOne> Unit193: right, those channels could then remove the ban locally if they like
[01:39] <LjL> it just screams overkill to me
[01:39] <LjL> if a user is being a big problem in dozens of channels, get them k-lined
[01:39] <LjL> if k-lining them is useless, then so is banning them
[01:39] <Unit193> Sounds like a quick way to fill up a ban list where the local OPs have no idea what they're for.
[19:11] <bazhang> Exterminate!!1