| === freeflying is now known as freeflying_away | ||
| jrwren_ | mgw: yes | 02:27 |
|---|---|---|
| mgw | jrwren_: are there docs somewhere on that? Do I just put multiple *.upstart scripts in debian dir? | 02:30 |
| === peter is now known as Guest73608 | ||
| jrwren_ | debian packaging docs are pretty good | 02:37 |
| mgw | jrwren_: I'm looking at the man page for dh_installinit | 02:44 |
| mgw | It looks to me like you'd do an override and then call it multiple times in the override | 02:44 |
| === jaimef_ is now known as jaimef | ||
| jrwren_ | sounds good. I don't knwo off hand | 02:52 |
| === freeflying_away is now known as freeflying | ||
| sheptard | so does anyone have an idea as to why when I have 2 hosts use jumbo frames I get NFS server timeouts? | 04:16 |
| sheptard | 2 hosts being server, client | 04:16 |
| sheptard | everything else network related seems fine, I was able to move ~40TB of data without incident via zfs send over the network | 04:17 |
| sheptard | both are running 13.10, 3.11.0-14-generic kernels | 04:18 |
| pmatulis | sheptard: because your network cannot handle jumbo frames? | 05:23 |
| sheptard | lol | 05:30 |
| sheptard | derp | 05:30 |
| sheptard | pmatulis: jumbo frames was turned off in the switch | 05:30 |
| pmatulis | sheptard: bingo | 05:31 |
| sheptard | pmatulis: tyvm | 05:35 |
| pmatulis | sheptard: yw, merry xmas | 05:35 |
| Smedles | wondering if anyone can help me diagnose an issue I periodically experience with my Ubuntu Server running 13.10... | 06:02 |
| Smedles | every few weeks I experience issues where machine on the local LAN cannot connect to the server using it's internal LAN address - no matter which port - whether it be ssh, samba, webmin, http, etc | 06:02 |
| Smedles | around the same time, server connections over the internet momentarily drop out (so quasselcore connection drops out) | 06:02 |
| Smedles | sometimes these just go away, others I need to reboot the server then everything is good. | 06:02 |
| Smedles | Any ideas? | 06:02 |
| XATRIX | I think networking script is broken | 08:36 |
| XATRIX | Hi | 08:36 |
| XATRIX | xatrix@vox1-ua:~$ sudo service networking restart | 08:36 |
| XATRIX | stop: Unknown instance: | 08:36 |
| XATRIX | networking stop/waiting | 08:36 |
| XATRIX | No way to fix it | 08:36 |
| === funkyHat_ is now known as funkyHat | ||
| === freeflying is now known as freeflying_away | ||
| Ontani | Hi i'm trying to make an vpn connection but constantly getting: Couldn't set tty to PPP discipline: Invalid argument, i'm using the following config: http://paste.ubuntu.com/6633520/ | 10:33 |
| Ontani | http://paste.ubuntu.com/6633542/ my output while connecting | 10:36 |
| Skinner | any recommended honeypot software to deploy on 12.04? | 11:54 |
| bigie | hi guys.. | 12:33 |
| bigie | is there any app on ubuntu can centralized user authentication ? | 12:34 |
| jpds | Why do they never stay for more than 5 minutes. | 12:40 |
| jpds | Skinner> honeyd would of been your answer, bigie> LDAP and Kerberos exist for a reason. | 12:40 |
| cfhowlett | jpds, OCD make the best sysadmins ... | 12:42 |
| jpds | bigie> LDAP and Kerberos exist for a reason | 12:46 |
| bigie | can you give me good step by step to do it? I'm new user in ubuntu :) | 12:47 |
| jpds | bigie: It's not trivial to set up. | 12:49 |
| jpds | bigie: https://help.ubuntu.com/12.04/serverguide/network-authentication.html | 12:49 |
| bigie | jpds : thank's i'll give a try :) | 12:51 |
| mrrothhcloud___ | Any open source Dropbox like package that will allow me to roll my own private cloud | 14:15 |
| thebwt | that.. marginally makes sense. | 14:16 |
| thebwt | you mean private cloud-liek storage? | 14:16 |
| thebwt | cloud-like? | 14:17 |
| mrrothhcloud___ | Yea | 14:17 |
| mrrothhcloud___ | And access my files anywhere like Dropbox | 14:17 |
| thebwt | hmm not sure of any prepackaged solutions.. except like straight up ftp | 14:18 |
| thebwt | is that undesirable? | 14:18 |
| thebwt | sftp is super easy and can by mounted by various applications | 14:18 |
| mrrothhcloud___ | Oh how about owncloud | 14:20 |
| thebwt | looks liek that works for a web interface | 14:21 |
| mrrothhcloud___ | Lame | 14:23 |
| mrrothhcloud___ | What mobile os do you use thebwt | 14:23 |
| rbasak | mrrothhcloud___: owncloud as you've found. Also look into git-annex. | 14:26 |
| mrrothhcloud___ | Thanks | 14:26 |
| === freeflying_away is now known as freeflying | ||
| vedic | I am running 3 servers on aws. Among these 3, one (the main) is accessible by the users over https connection. Remaining 2 I want to connect to the main via VPN. Is it possible? | 17:12 |
| vedic | users <--https--> Main <--VPN--> Database server and Main <--VPN--> Data processing Server | 17:13 |
| pmatulis | vedic: try openvpn | 17:20 |
| vedic | pmatulis: Using openvpn, is that possible to have that sort of topology? | 17:21 |
| pmatulis | vedic: sure, why not? | 17:22 |
| vedic | pmatulis: Instead of establishing https connection for every database transaction I think vpn is much cheaper in that case | 17:22 |
| vedic | ok | 17:22 |
| vedic | Thanks | 17:22 |
| pmatulis | vedic: a tunnel between 'main' & 'db' and a tunnel between 'main' & 'processing' | 17:23 |
| vedic | pmatulis: yea | 17:23 |
| pmatulis | vedic: if 'db' and 'processing' are on the same lan you can prolly do it with a single tunnel | 17:23 |
| vedic | pmatulis: how? | 17:24 |
| pmatulis | vedic: but since these are cloud instances i think 2 tunnels is the way to go | 17:24 |
| vedic | pmatulis: yea, I was thinking the same | 17:24 |
| pmatulis | vedic: are these servers and tunnels long term? | 17:25 |
| pmatulis | vedic: if not, you may consider SSH-based VPNs | 17:26 |
| vedic | pmatulis: yea, all 3 servers and tunnels needs to run 24x7 | 17:26 |
| pmatulis | vedic: ok | 17:26 |
| jpds | vedic: openvpn/strongswan ipsec, they'd both work. | 17:29 |
| vedic | jpds: Thanks. Didn't know about strongswan | 17:33 |
| jpds | vedic: Otherwise, you can consider https://aws.amazon.com/vpc/ as an option. | 17:33 |
| vedic | jpds: Wow. vpc seems the option I am looking for | 17:36 |
| jpds | It does kind of tie you into Amazon though, but those are the three I would consider. | 17:38 |
| jpds | And if you're paranoid as I am, you need to consider how your bits are flowing over the VPC. | 17:41 |
| vedic | jpds: Didn't get what you mean by 'how your bits are flowing over the vpc' | 18:21 |
| jpds | vedic: How do you know how Amazon are handling the packets going through the network? | 18:27 |
| jpds | vedic: If there's any encryption, etc. | 18:28 |
| vedic | jpds: Does that matter when tunnel is set between two end points. | 18:28 |
| vedic | jpds: For VPC, I think they will be taking least path. Thought its assumption as I haven't read what aws does for VPC | 18:29 |
| jpds | vedic: Is the tunnel encrypted? That's the thing. | 18:32 |
| vedic | jpds: Hmm... that has point. If its not encrypted, its useless for me. I won't even opt for this. You never know if internally they change the routing mechanism | 18:34 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!