=== freeflying is now known as freeflying_away [02:27] mgw: yes [02:30] jrwren_: are there docs somewhere on that? Do I just put multiple *.upstart scripts in debian dir? === peter is now known as Guest73608 [02:37] debian packaging docs are pretty good [02:44] jrwren_: I'm looking at the man page for dh_installinit [02:44] It looks to me like you'd do an override and then call it multiple times in the override === jaimef_ is now known as jaimef [02:52] sounds good. I don't knwo off hand === freeflying_away is now known as freeflying [04:16] so does anyone have an idea as to why when I have 2 hosts use jumbo frames I get NFS server timeouts? [04:16] 2 hosts being server, client [04:17] everything else network related seems fine, I was able to move ~40TB of data without incident via zfs send over the network [04:18] both are running 13.10, 3.11.0-14-generic kernels [05:23] sheptard: because your network cannot handle jumbo frames? [05:30] lol [05:30] derp [05:30] pmatulis: jumbo frames was turned off in the switch [05:31] sheptard: bingo [05:35] pmatulis: tyvm [05:35] sheptard: yw, merry xmas [06:02] wondering if anyone can help me diagnose an issue I periodically experience with my Ubuntu Server running 13.10... [06:02] every few weeks I experience issues where machine on the local LAN cannot connect to the server using it's internal LAN address - no matter which port - whether it be ssh, samba, webmin, http, etc [06:02] around the same time, server connections over the internet momentarily drop out (so quasselcore connection drops out) [06:02] sometimes these just go away, others I need to reboot the server then everything is good. [06:02] Any ideas? [08:36] I think networking script is broken [08:36] Hi [08:36] xatrix@vox1-ua:~$ sudo service networking restart [08:36] stop: Unknown instance: [08:36] networking stop/waiting [08:36] No way to fix it === funkyHat_ is now known as funkyHat === freeflying is now known as freeflying_away [10:33] Hi i'm trying to make an vpn connection but constantly getting: Couldn't set tty to PPP discipline: Invalid argument, i'm using the following config: http://paste.ubuntu.com/6633520/ [10:36] http://paste.ubuntu.com/6633542/ my output while connecting [11:54] any recommended honeypot software to deploy on 12.04? [12:33] hi guys.. [12:34] is there any app on ubuntu can centralized user authentication ? [12:40] Why do they never stay for more than 5 minutes. [12:40] Skinner> honeyd would of been your answer, bigie> LDAP and Kerberos exist for a reason. [12:42] jpds, OCD make the best sysadmins ... [12:46] bigie> LDAP and Kerberos exist for a reason [12:47] can you give me good step by step to do it? I'm new user in ubuntu :) [12:49] bigie: It's not trivial to set up. [12:49] bigie: https://help.ubuntu.com/12.04/serverguide/network-authentication.html [12:51] jpds : thank's i'll give a try :) [14:15] Any open source Dropbox like package that will allow me to roll my own private cloud [14:16] that.. marginally makes sense. [14:16] you mean private cloud-liek storage? [14:17] cloud-like? [14:17] Yea [14:17] And access my files anywhere like Dropbox [14:18] hmm not sure of any prepackaged solutions.. except like straight up ftp [14:18] is that undesirable? [14:18] sftp is super easy and can by mounted by various applications [14:20] Oh how about owncloud [14:21] looks liek that works for a web interface [14:23] Lame [14:23] What mobile os do you use thebwt [14:26] mrrothhcloud___: owncloud as you've found. Also look into git-annex. [14:26] Thanks === freeflying_away is now known as freeflying [17:12] I am running 3 servers on aws. Among these 3, one (the main) is accessible by the users over https connection. Remaining 2 I want to connect to the main via VPN. Is it possible? [17:13] users <--https--> Main <--VPN--> Database server and Main <--VPN--> Data processing Server [17:20] vedic: try openvpn [17:21] pmatulis: Using openvpn, is that possible to have that sort of topology? [17:22] vedic: sure, why not? [17:22] pmatulis: Instead of establishing https connection for every database transaction I think vpn is much cheaper in that case [17:22] ok [17:22] Thanks [17:23] vedic: a tunnel between 'main' & 'db' and a tunnel between 'main' & 'processing' [17:23] pmatulis: yea [17:23] vedic: if 'db' and 'processing' are on the same lan you can prolly do it with a single tunnel [17:24] pmatulis: how? [17:24] vedic: but since these are cloud instances i think 2 tunnels is the way to go [17:24] pmatulis: yea, I was thinking the same [17:25] vedic: are these servers and tunnels long term? [17:26] vedic: if not, you may consider SSH-based VPNs [17:26] pmatulis: yea, all 3 servers and tunnels needs to run 24x7 [17:26] vedic: ok [17:29] vedic: openvpn/strongswan ipsec, they'd both work. [17:33] jpds: Thanks. Didn't know about strongswan [17:33] vedic: Otherwise, you can consider https://aws.amazon.com/vpc/ as an option. [17:36] jpds: Wow. vpc seems the option I am looking for [17:38] It does kind of tie you into Amazon though, but those are the three I would consider. [17:41] And if you're paranoid as I am, you need to consider how your bits are flowing over the VPC. [18:21] jpds: Didn't get what you mean by 'how your bits are flowing over the vpc' [18:27] vedic: How do you know how Amazon are handling the packets going through the network? [18:28] vedic: If there's any encryption, etc. [18:28] jpds: Does that matter when tunnel is set between two end points. [18:29] jpds: For VPC, I think they will be taking least path. Thought its assumption as I haven't read what aws does for VPC [18:32] vedic: Is the tunnel encrypted? That's the thing. [18:34] jpds: Hmm... that has point. If its not encrypted, its useless for me. I won't even opt for this. You never know if internally they change the routing mechanism