=== j_f-f_ is now known as j_f-f [15:29] Happy new year everybody... [15:36] Thank you. [15:36] Happy New Year to you too, Geochr. [20:01] Happy New Year, locoteams! [20:37] Thanks BobJonkman. [20:47] BobJonkman: ping [20:48] belkinsa: pong! [20:49] I took some interest in your LoCo's plans for video meetings. I would suggest that instead of tinychat, you could try chatb.org since it doesn't require accounts or anything but update browsers. [20:50] chatb.org runs on webrtc. [20:50] WebRTC looks to be full of promise [20:51] I wonder if it interoperates with the WebRTC in Jitsi. [20:51] Jitsi has a quite an impressive demo on YouTube [20:51] I have Jitsi on my computer, I should try connecting chatb.org [20:52] I just looked at chatb.org at the URL you put on Discourse; didn't work for me [20:53] The http://chatb.org/#ubuntu-ca ? [20:53] (but I was using a locked down browser -- allowed Javascript, but has all kinds of other blocks for referer, ID string, &c.) [20:53] Ah. I have my own issues. [20:54] I use my tablet and Firefox that is on it for chatb.org. [20:54] Seems I have a connection with Chromium. Come join me... [20:55] Give me a sec [20:56] There [20:58] wait, does chatb.org allow multiple people to talk to each other? [20:58] like, more than two [20:58] I think so. [20:58] and it works fully peer-to-peer? [20:59] well, a small server to maintain the IDs [20:59] but the audio/video stream [20:59] Maybe you should come and check? [21:00] I can't atm, but can somebody link me to the source? [21:00] I mean like [21:00] git repo or so [21:01] You don't need it, just a browser will do and this link: http://chatb.org/#ubuntu-ca [21:01] *sigh* [21:01] Is there a problem? [21:01] you do realize that javascript can be uglified [21:01] which means the actual source is not visible [21:02] comments and everything is stripped [21:02] Oh [21:02] hmm [21:02] "wsHost": "wss://chatb.org:2680", [21:03] https://chatb.org/js/index.js isn't uglified :P [21:03] ok then [21:03] BobJonkman, let me restart my tablet [21:03] OK [21:04] doesn't seem to be p2p [21:04] Huh. [21:04] it uses a server for streaming [21:04] *central server [21:05] I want something like this but with http://peerjs.com/ [21:06] We have three now. [21:06] But I see no video [21:07] I just have mic on [21:09] Bah, I blame Internet connection on this... [21:10] Maybe just use mic? [21:11] Well, um, that was a try [21:12] I have two sessions running now, but no video from one to the other. So, most likely not P2P, but all connecting to a central server [21:12] Could be. [21:52] omnidan, you can do chatb.org with more than two. [21:56] belkinsa: yeah, but it's not p2p [21:56] What difference does it make? [22:11] uh [22:11] less load on the server [22:11] no central server required [22:11] streams between peers, server can't sniff [22:14] Oh. I see. [22:15] belkinsa: I was working on adding hub/leaf support to peerjs so I can create something like that for hackathons, but p2p [22:15] oh also p2p means less traffic when in a local network [22:16] *less traffic to the global internet* [22:16] and that'd be useful at hackathons [22:18] I see.