| TheLordOfTime | is this a VBox bug? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1265945 | 00:59 |
|---|---|---|
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1265945 in Ubuntu "Ubuntu 13.10-64 install on X64 fails " [Undecided,New] | 00:59 |
| TheLordOfTime | (the summary has been edited slightly by me to be more precise but still) | 01:00 |
| hggdh | TheLordOfTime: if it is a bug (which, right now, I cannot confirm) it is on VB. Chances are the OP has another virtualisation setup that is owning the x86-64, or the VB module(s) did not build correctly | 01:03 |
| TheLordOfTime | hggdh, where should the bug be filed against hten | 01:04 |
| TheLordOfTime | it's only against Ubuntu atm | 01:04 |
| TheLordOfTime | and nothing specific | 01:04 |
| * TheLordOfTime did edit the summary to be less vague | 01:04 | |
| hggdh | I would guess against VB; this has no indication of being the ISO | 01:04 |
| TheLordOfTime | hggdh, so whatever the source package is for virtualbox is, then... | 01:05 |
| TheLordOfTime | i forget what that is... *looks it up* | 01:05 |
| TheLordOfTime | hggdh, i see a problem though | 01:05 |
| TheLordOfTime | note the host OSes | 01:05 |
| TheLordOfTime | the bug is Invalid in ubuntu | 01:05 |
| TheLordOfTime | if it's against VBox | 01:05 |
| TheLordOfTime | the host OSes are Windows | 01:05 |
| hggdh | the ubuntu load is complaining there is no x86_64, only a i686. So VB is passing the wrong thing, the setup is wrong, or the 64-bits modules are not loaded | 01:06 |
| hggdh | TheLordOfTime: oh. Windows. | 01:06 |
| TheLordOfTime | hggdh: if that's the case it's still invalid because Windows host | 01:06 |
| TheLordOfTime | hggdh, i'm commenting about that and setting Invalid right now to that extent | 01:06 |
| hggdh | OK, agreed | 01:07 |
| * hggdh moves to dinner | 01:07 | |
| TheLordOfTime | hggdh, marked as Invalid. | 01:09 |
| hggdh | TheLordOfTime: thank you | 01:12 |
| TheLordOfTime | you're welcome :) | 01:14 |
| === paddy_ is now known as Guest14973 | ||
| === EzraR is now known as Guest5965 | ||
| === PaulW2U is now known as Guest9135 | ||
| === G is now known as Guest24872 | ||
| === ikonia_ is now known as Guest81077 | ||
| === Guest24872 is now known as G | ||
| === G is now known as 21WAB3GNN | ||
| === 21WAB3GNN is now known as G | ||
| j_f-f | Hi, please trigage the bug #1266000, and set the Importance to high | 12:06 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1266000 in mailgraph (Ubuntu) "WARNING: ignoring future date in syslog line" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1266000 | 12:06 |
| penguin42 | j_f-f: Which part do you say makes this a 'high' https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance | 12:13 |
| j_f-f | penguin42: "A bug that has a severe impact on a non-core application". But medium should not be used | 12:16 |
| penguin42 | why? Those are the triaging rules for the severities | 12:18 |
| j_f-f | https://dev.launchpad.net/BugTriage : Others We do not use Medium or Wishlist. | 12:21 |
| j_f-f | ok wrong page :-(, Then medium please | 12:22 |
| penguin42 | j_f-f: Reading the bug, are you sure it's not a time screwup? You don't give your time when you run the command in comment #2 | 12:25 |
| j_f-f | I run it a tick before post | 12:27 |
| j_f-f | and a plot the time offset via munin with max 3ms | 12:28 |
| j_f-f | penguin42: I think its not a timezone issue, there is no delta in the logs | 13:10 |
| === Guest81077 is now known as ikonia | ||
| === paddy_ is now known as paddy | ||
| === toddyhb is now known as toddy | ||
| dotnokato1 | Hi, I have a question concerning reporting a bug for trusty: I noticed that libpango1.0-0 is a transitional package and instead other packages should depend on libpango-1.0-0. I have the list of affected packages (21). Should I report a bug for each package separately or should I rather create one report for the whole list? | 20:10 |
| penguin42 | dotnokato1: One bug can affect multiple packages - maybe that's best? I'd check if there is one already though | 20:11 |
| dotnokato1 | penguin42: I'll check if this is reported already. Regarding reporting one bug for multiple packages: should I use ubuntu-bug or go through launchpad directly? | 20:14 |
| penguin42 | dotnokato1: Report it once via ubuntu-bug and then I think you can via the lp interface add 'also-affects' for the other packages | 20:17 |
| penguin42 | dotnokato1: However, given the thing you're dealing with, I think I'd check with the package maintainer for libpango about what they want to do | 20:17 |
| dotnokato1 | penguin42: Thanks, I'll create a question in launchpad first. | 20:22 |
| penguin42 | dotnokato1: Maybe also ask in #ubuntu-packaging? | 20:22 |
| dotnokato1 | penguin42: Will do. Thanks :) | 20:23 |
| TheLordOfTime | dotnokato1, big FYI if you want to avoid getting slapped around. | 20:39 |
| TheLordOfTime | dotnokato1, don't crosspost | 20:39 |
| TheLordOfTime | pick a channel, post your question, don't post everywhere else | 20:39 |
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === Ursinha is now known as Guest43575 | ||
| TheLordOfTime | ahh missed that there, sorry dotnokato1 | 20:51 |
| * TheLordOfTime didn't see penguin42 suggest to ask in -packaging | 20:51 | |
| TheLordOfTime | my bad! | 20:51 |
| dotnokato1 | TheLordOfTime: :) | 20:52 |
| === Guest43575 is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === Ursinha is now known as Guest30084 | ||
| === paddy is now known as paddy_ | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!