[00:59] <TheLordOfTime> is this a VBox bug?  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1265945
[00:59] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1265945 in Ubuntu "Ubuntu 13.10-64 install on X64 fails " [Undecided,New]
[01:00] <TheLordOfTime> (the summary has been edited slightly by me to be more precise but still)
[01:03] <hggdh> TheLordOfTime: if it is a bug (which, right now, I cannot confirm) it is on VB. Chances are the OP has another virtualisation setup that is owning the x86-64, or the VB module(s) did not build correctly
[01:04] <TheLordOfTime> hggdh, where should the bug be filed against hten
[01:04] <TheLordOfTime> it's only against Ubuntu atm
[01:04] <TheLordOfTime> and nothing specific
[01:04]  * TheLordOfTime did edit the summary to be less vague
[01:04] <hggdh> I would guess against VB; this has no indication of being the ISO
[01:05] <TheLordOfTime> hggdh, so whatever the source package is for virtualbox is, then...
[01:05] <TheLordOfTime> i forget what that is... *looks it up*
[01:05] <TheLordOfTime> hggdh, i see a problem though
[01:05] <TheLordOfTime> note the host OSes
[01:05] <TheLordOfTime> the bug is Invalid in ubuntu
[01:05] <TheLordOfTime> if it's against VBox
[01:05] <TheLordOfTime> the host OSes are Windows
[01:06] <hggdh> the ubuntu load is complaining there is no x86_64, only a i686. So VB is passing the wrong thing, the setup is wrong, or the 64-bits modules are not loaded
[01:06] <hggdh> TheLordOfTime: oh. Windows.
[01:06] <TheLordOfTime> hggdh: if that's the case it's still invalid because Windows host
[01:06] <TheLordOfTime> hggdh, i'm commenting about that and setting Invalid right now to that extent
[01:07] <hggdh> OK, agreed
[01:07]  * hggdh moves to dinner
[01:09] <TheLordOfTime> hggdh, marked as Invalid.
[01:12] <hggdh> TheLordOfTime: thank you
[01:14] <TheLordOfTime> you're welcome :)
=== paddy_ is now known as Guest14973
=== EzraR is now known as Guest5965
=== PaulW2U is now known as Guest9135
=== G is now known as Guest24872
=== ikonia_ is now known as Guest81077
=== Guest24872 is now known as G
=== G is now known as 21WAB3GNN
=== 21WAB3GNN is now known as G
[12:06] <j_f-f> Hi, please trigage the bug #1266000, and set the Importance to high
[12:06] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1266000 in mailgraph (Ubuntu) "WARNING: ignoring future date in syslog line" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1266000
[12:13] <penguin42> j_f-f: Which part do you say makes this a 'high'  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance
[12:16] <j_f-f> penguin42: "A bug that has a severe impact on a non-core application". But medium should not be used
[12:18] <penguin42> why? Those are the triaging rules for the severities
[12:21] <j_f-f> https://dev.launchpad.net/BugTriage : Others We do not use Medium or Wishlist.
[12:22] <j_f-f> ok wrong page :-(, Then medium please
[12:25] <penguin42> j_f-f: Reading the bug, are you sure it's not a time screwup?  You don't give your time when you run the command in comment #2
[12:27] <j_f-f> I run it a tick before post
[12:28] <j_f-f> and a plot the time offset via munin with max 3ms
[13:10] <j_f-f> penguin42: I think its not a timezone issue, there is no delta in the logs
=== Guest81077 is now known as ikonia
=== paddy_ is now known as paddy
=== toddyhb is now known as toddy
[20:10] <dotnokato1> Hi, I have a question concerning reporting a bug for trusty: I noticed that libpango1.0-0 is a transitional package and instead other packages should depend on libpango-1.0-0. I have the list of affected packages (21). Should I report a bug for each package separately or should I rather create one report for the whole list?
[20:11] <penguin42> dotnokato1: One bug can affect multiple packages - maybe that's best?  I'd check if there is one already though
[20:14] <dotnokato1> penguin42: I'll check if this is reported already. Regarding reporting one bug for multiple packages: should I use ubuntu-bug or go through launchpad directly?
[20:17] <penguin42> dotnokato1: Report it once via ubuntu-bug and then I think you can via the lp interface add 'also-affects' for the other packages
[20:17] <penguin42> dotnokato1: However, given the thing you're dealing with, I think I'd check with the package maintainer for libpango about what they want to do
[20:22] <dotnokato1> penguin42: Thanks, I'll create a question in launchpad first.
[20:22] <penguin42> dotnokato1: Maybe also ask in #ubuntu-packaging?
[20:23] <dotnokato1> penguin42: Will do. Thanks :)
[20:39] <TheLordOfTime> dotnokato1, big FYI if you want to avoid getting slapped around.
[20:39] <TheLordOfTime> dotnokato1, don't crosspost
[20:39] <TheLordOfTime> pick a channel, post your question, don't post everywhere else
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
=== Ursinha is now known as Guest43575
[20:51] <TheLordOfTime> ahh missed that there, sorry dotnokato1
[20:51]  * TheLordOfTime didn't see penguin42 suggest to ask in -packaging
[20:51] <TheLordOfTime> my bad!
[20:52] <dotnokato1> TheLordOfTime: :)
=== Guest43575 is now known as Ursinha
=== Ursinha is now known as Guest30084
=== paddy is now known as paddy_