=== NCommander is now known as 14WABSAYH [09:24] ok can any archive admin look at the lts-saucy stuff? :P [13:08] mlankhorst: [fx: cracks knuckles, re-embarks on gigantic review pile] [13:10] stgraber: queuebot is sad [13:12] Laney, mono in mom still has the "leave" comment. is this still valid? [13:12] yes [13:13] talk to directhex, he wanted to work on it [13:20] mlankhorst: looks like bug 1247607 needs verification as part of all this, btw [13:20] Launchpad bug 1247607 in gcc "Libdrm compiled with gcc 4.8 makes card hang on resume from s2disk" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1247607 [13:20] (despite not having p-r tasks) [13:20] oh [13:20] but it wasn't affected :P [13:21] but it's part of the libdrm update [13:21] ok [13:21] so I guess the bug must have been mentioned in the p-r changelogs [13:21] yeah [13:23] if you get an error about the pixman/precise-updates copy, ignore it, I retried and it worked [13:23] ok [13:31] I'll test if it doesn't regress on raring at least [13:35] what a surprise; it doesn't ;-) === alex_abreu is now known as alex-abreu [14:11] cjwatson: restarted [14:11] ta [15:04] * cjwatson attacks the glew transition a bit [15:05] cjwatson: yes please, i've run out of cycles to push it further =/ [15:05] yeah, it's blocking unity I see, so we'd better [15:08] cjwatson: well, unity7 which had no changes and that did rebuild. is that actually pushed to daily release? cause i didn't think there was anything. [15:09] no idea but getting in the way of anything desktopish for very long is usually a bad plan :) [15:11] true. [15:21] ohh man, qt4-x11 wasn't merged for ages :-/ [15:22] mitya57 mentioned some work on an update to qt4 earlier [15:22] doko: yeah, merge is in progress and soon to be uploaded. [15:23] * xnox was thinking to help out with it but it's almost done at this point. [15:23] xnox, ohh, ok === charles_ is now known as charles [15:42] * stgraber does a post-holidays run through pending-sru [16:40] stgraber: please don't release update-manager to quantal-updates [16:42] bdmurray: yeah, I know about that one :) [16:42] hmm, looks like pending-sru is broken... /me goes to kick it a bit [16:42] stgraber: okay, great [16:44] the report was apparently running since the 3rd... killed and re-running manually now [17:35] mlankhorst: I think that's them all now [17:35] though I haven't gone round checking exhaustively for build failures / dep-waits / whatever [17:35] I guess pending-sru will do that for us eventually [17:40] hey release team do we know on what day exactly raring will eol [17:40] davmor2: I need to pick an arbitrary date and send out a warning email today. [17:41] davmor2: Normally, it would be ~45d from the warning email, but that's probably pushing it too far out at this point, so it'll like be 30ish or less. [17:41] (I guess the 9mo support cycle can be used to justify the shorter warning period too...) [17:41] When really, it was just "hey, holidays", and I forgot. [17:41] infinity: indeed [17:41] haha [17:51] mlankhorst: hey, what's the testing status of xorg-server-lts-quantal in precise-proposed? it doesn't have a bug number and has been in there for a while now. [17:54] stgraber: I assume it's a straight backport refresh of what's in quantal... [17:55] ... which is also in proposed. [18:27] I'm looking to tidy up update_excuses.html and the first thing on it is a kde package cantor which isn't published in ppc64el, why would that be? [18:29] because of no maxima meaning that -maxima isn't installable [19:29] hi. not sure if my last message was sent due to an outage. [19:29] Hi. Can I get a package removed from proposed? It failed verification, and [19:29] I have a new fix for it. The package is iproute and its the -proposed [19:29] versions in R/Q/P [19:31] arges: if you already have a new version, let's just accept it into proposed and have it supersede the existing one [19:31] not seeing a new iproute in the queue though [19:32] stgraber: yea i haven't pusehd a new version yet [19:32] i'll work on that now [20:00] well looks like i have more research to do [20:36] Riddell: You get a lot of this kind of stuff with new ports, typically ... [21:52] infinity, cjwatson: is the doxygen autopkg test still running, or is it lying? [21:53] I'm fairly sure you could get batuan VPN access :-) [21:54] anyway, it's lying, it passed. jibel wanted to be informed of such cases [21:54] but not around, so somebody who isn't about to go out to the shop could force it I suppose [23:12] has raring reached end of life yet? (wiki says January 2014 is 13.04 raring's EOL date) [23:13] no. releases happen near the end of the month, so do EOLs [23:13] slangasek, so at the end of january 2014 raring is going to be considered EOL? [23:14] TheLordOfTime: it should be 9 months to the day after the release; I don't have the date to hand, infinity might [23:14] well if https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases is right it was released on april 25th [23:14] 2013 [23:15] so... january 25th give or take a couple days [23:15] ? [23:15] * TheLordOfTime kicks his phone's keyboard around for failures [23:15] TheLordOfTime: Yeah, right around then. I'll draft and send an email warning today, it's on my long list of "ugh, Monday" tasks. [23:16] infinity, OK, it's on my list of tasks for Ask Ubuntu Meta today to post an EOL reminder, so I was seeking a specific date, I'll use January 25th as a rough estimate date because of 9 months of support and the release on April 25, 2013 + 9 months calculation [23:17] TheLordOfTime: I'll probably pick the 27th, as 3 weeks from now. [23:17] works for me [23:17] (And update the EOL process to recommend 3w warning for non-LTS, and 45d for LTS) [23:18] Since a 45d warning is a bit excessive for something whose entire life span is only 9mo. [23:19] But first, I think I should get around to that breakfast I've been putting off all day. :/ [23:20] infinity, heh