| ypwong | Does launchpad API support filing bugs? | 02:22 |
|---|---|---|
| wgrant | ypwong: The createBug method at https://api.launchpad.net/+apidoc/devel.html#bugs | 02:32 |
| ypwong | wgrant, nice! thanks. | 02:33 |
| DalekSec | https://code.launchpad.net/~vcs-imports/cherokee/master that was turned off because it had submodules, no I believe it no longer does. | 02:45 |
| wgrant | DalekSec: There are still submodules in that repository's history, and due to the nature of git we need to be able to replicate the entire history in bzr. | 02:58 |
| wgrant | So it's still not possible to import it. | 02:58 |
| Fudge | hi, wanting to be made a manager of our http://launchpad.net/~vinux and looking for a link I can pass on to themuso so it can be done quick :D | 03:12 |
| wgrant | https://launchpad.net/~vinux/+member/fudge | 03:13 |
| Fudge | wgrant: thank you yso kindly | 03:16 |
| jeblair | wgrant: hi, could you transfer the openstack-ci-admins team owner for us? https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/241991 | 04:08 |
| jeblair | wgrant: the current owner had his laptop stolen, so we're a little worried about credentials | 04:08 |
| jeblair | wgrant: thanks | 04:09 |
| wgrant | jeblair: Oh, I just replied on the ticket asking if Monty could do that. | 04:10 |
| wgrant | Let me see what I can do. | 04:10 |
| wgrant | jeblair: He still owns ~openstack-admins, which is surely just as big a problem. | 04:11 |
| jeblair | wgrant: oh yes that's true. i missed that. | 04:12 |
| jeblair | wgrant: does that need a human owner? or can it be self-owned? | 04:12 |
| wgrant | It needs a human owner (or at least an owner that it doesn't own), so there's always someone we can blame and/or who can recover everything if the team admins go evil. | 04:13 |
| jeblair | wgrant: then can we also change that to me (corvus) | 04:13 |
| jeblair | wgrant: should i add that to the question? | 04:14 |
| wgrant | Please do, just so we have a paper trail. | 04:14 |
| wgrant | jeblair: Is there someone else around to confirm these changes, just so I have some reassurance that you aren't someone who has stolen jeblair's laptop and is kicking poor Monty out? :) | 04:15 |
| StevenK | I can confirm jeblair is on jeblair's laptop, since I pointed him at you in the first place. | 04:16 |
| StevenK | If that helps. | 04:16 |
| wgrant | Damn, now StevenK's laptop has been stolen too. | 04:19 |
| wgrant | OK, will get the changes made | 04:19 |
| StevenK | Hahaha | 04:19 |
| wgrant | ~openstack-ci-admins will be owned by ~openstack-admins, and ~openstack-admins by ~corvus | 04:20 |
| jeblair | wgrant: thanks! | 04:20 |
| StevenK | wgrant: I did consider cornering a certain ~admins member here at LCA, but decided against it | 04:20 |
| DarrenS | StevenK: hax | 04:22 |
| StevenK | DarrenS: Hahaha | 04:22 |
| DarrenS | all aboard the duckbus | 04:23 |
| DarrenS | hi that's done | 04:30 |
| wgrant | jeblair, StevenK ^^ | 04:31 |
| wgrant | Thanks DarrenS | 04:31 |
| DarrenS | NP vale laptop | 04:31 |
| wgrant | Heh | 04:31 |
| czajkowski | aloha | 09:08 |
| mpt | cprov, hi, you should join #launchpad-dev too :) | 13:46 |
| cprov | mpt: hi there! done. | 13:47 |
| czajkowski | mpt: ello | 13:53 |
| mpt | Hello … czajkowski | 14:04 |
| === jamesh__ is now known as jamesh | ||
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| dmXE | hi! anybody to help on apparently successful ppa upload followed by nothing? | 19:40 |
| dobey | dmXE: if you got no e-mail it wasn't successful. you probably either signed it with the wrong gpg key, or don't have your gpg added to your lp account | 19:53 |
| dmXE | but this was not the first time. I have uploaded successfully many times using the same key | 19:54 |
| dobey | then you should get an e-mail about the package either being accepted or rejected in the ppa | 19:58 |
| dmXE | but I did not | 19:59 |
| dobey | then either the key wasn't validated, the e-mail just hasn't got to you yet because it's being slow for some reason, or you've overlooked it or it's in a spam folder or something | 20:03 |
| dobey | i don't know of anything else that could be the issue you claim to be seeing | 20:03 |
| dmXE | the last time i tried was one week ago. | 20:06 |
| dmXE | thank you anyway | 20:06 |
| TheLordOfTime | dmXE: you can always try and reupload. | 20:11 |
| dmXE | I am trying now | 20:12 |
| TheLordOfTime | dobey: we could always blame cosmic rays for random things like this, if there's no logical explanantion, those cosmic rays always mess with things in weird ways | 20:15 |
| TheLordOfTime | ;) | 20:15 |
| cjwatson | dmXE: What's your username? | 20:28 |
| cjwatson | (on Launchpad) | 20:28 |
| cjwatson | dmXE: Or the package name you were trying to upload | 20:29 |
| dmXE | username: dmxe | 20:29 |
| dmXE | package name: lifeograph | 20:30 |
| dmXE | ppa:dmxe/ppa | 20:31 |
| cjwatson | 2014-01-10 20:16:18 INFO Failed to parse changes file '/srv/launchpad.net/ppa-queue/incoming/upload-ftp-20140110-201612-028225/~dmxe/ppa/ubuntu/lifeograph_1.0.0-1~ppa1~saucy_source.changes': GPG verification of /srv/launchpad.net/ppa-queue/incoming/upload-ftp-201 | 20:35 |
| cjwatson | 40110-201612-028225/~dmxe/ppa/ubuntu/lifeograph_1.0.0-1~ppa1~saucy_source.changes failed: Verification failed 3 times: ["(7, 153, u'Key expired')", "(7, 153, u'Key expired')", "(7, 153, u'Key expired')"] | 20:35 |
| TheLordOfTime | dmXE: make sure your GPG key isn't "expired", that error there indicates the key had an expiration date and that is now passed | 20:35 |
| TheLordOfTime | so the key is invalid | 20:35 |
| TheLordOfTime | (in which case, time to create a new key) | 20:35 |
| dmXE | my key was going to expire a few months ago but i extended its duration | 20:36 |
| cjwatson | dmXE: Of your two keys registered in Launchpad, one apparently expired on 2011-08-31, and the other on 2013-11-06 | 20:36 |
| TheLordOfTime | dmXE: if you extended it you then have to upload the changes to the key to the keyservers | 20:37 |
| cjwatson | dmXE: Did you upload it to keyserver.ubuntu.com with the extended duration before the expiry date? | 20:37 |
| cjwatson | dmXE: It might not accept it now ... | 20:37 |
| TheLordOfTime | ^ that | 20:37 |
| * TheLordOfTime was ninja'd | 20:37 | |
| dmXE | no i didn't upload | 20:37 |
| cjwatson | dmXE: When I downloaded it from keyserver.ubuntu.com just now, I saw an expiry of 2013-11-06 | 20:37 |
| cjwatson | dmXE: Then Launchpad can't possibly know about the updated expiry | 20:37 |
| cjwatson | dmXE: I suspect you'll need a new key now | 20:37 |
| dmXE | ok. thank you very much | 20:38 |
| dmXE | i will create a new key, import it to launchpad and try again | 20:38 |
| cjwatson | You can always try uploading the extended-duration key just in case | 20:39 |
| cjwatson | Although it would seem like a bit of a hole in the expiry system if you could do that | 20:39 |
| dmXE | is it sufficient to use Sync and publish keys... function of Passwords and Keys program for this purpose? | 20:40 |
| cjwatson | I don't know, I don't use that | 20:40 |
| TheLordOfTime | cjwatson: I'd say they should try and push the key anyways, if it accepts it, then security bug against `sks` or whatever the keyserver backend is | 20:41 |
| TheLordOfTime | because that'd seem like a hugely bad thing | 20:41 |
| cjwatson | TheLordOfTime: Well, depending on what the stated security model of expiry dates actually is | 20:41 |
| cjwatson | Which I have not checked | 20:41 |
| TheLordOfTime | true. | 20:41 |
| TheLordOfTime | dmXE: that should work, yes. | 20:41 |
| dmXE | Ok I did that and am reuploading | 20:42 |
| cjwatson | https://help.launchpad.net/YourAccount/ImportingYourPGPKey does indeed point to "Sync and Publish Keys" | 20:42 |
| cjwatson | dmXE: ok, that worked as far as it went, but now you have a proper rejection | 20:43 |
| cjwatson | dmXE: which FWIW can be fixed by building the source package with the -sa option, since this is the first upload of this .orig.tar.gz (apparently) | 20:44 |
| dmXE | yes. so sync worked it seems | 20:44 |
| cjwatson | apparently so | 20:44 |
| * cjwatson -> away | 20:44 | |
| dmXE | othat is great | 20:44 |
| dmXE | It is accepted now. thank you everybody. | 20:54 |
| dmXE | just a small question: why doesn't launchpad send an email about the problems such as this one to the user? wouldn't it be helpful? | 20:56 |
| dobey | becasue it can't validate that you are who you say you are | 20:59 |
| dmXE | it looks to me like it's worth the risk. but maybe i am wrong. anyway... thank you for your time. bye... | 21:12 |
| TheLordOfTime | how long does it normally take for the launchpad PPAs to pick up a new upload? | 22:07 |
| TheLordOfTime | from near instant to 5 minutes or something? | 22:07 |
| dobey | somewhere between 0 and infinity | 22:08 |
| wgrant | TheLordOfTime: A minute or two. | 22:18 |
| TheLordOfTime | dobey: heh | 22:18 |
| TheLordOfTime | wgrant: that's what i thought, thanks. | 22:19 |
| TheLordOfTime | is there a way to cancel dep-wait'd builds in PPAs? | 22:41 |
| TheLordOfTime | because I've got some that're depwait'd and they'll FTBFS because of a third-party nginx module and I have to talk to the third-party module devs to see if they can fix it | 22:42 |
| wgrant | TheLordOfTime: You can retry them manually and then cancel them | 22:42 |
| TheLordOfTime | wgrant: no way to do that en masse or with an API call is there? | 22:42 |
| TheLordOfTime | i'd rather not have to do it for 6 separate pages :/ | 22:43 |
| wgrant | You could use an API call, but surely it's not that terrible to click through six pages. | 22:43 |
| TheLordOfTime | wgrant: on a netbook it is | 22:44 |
| TheLordOfTime | small screen, no external mouse, crap touchpad >.> | 22:45 |
| TheLordOfTime | wgrant: meh, i've cancelled them, but that should be an option, IMO, for dep-wait builds, to just force-cancel it without first telling it to retry *shrugs* | 22:45 |
| KI7MT | Heello all .. I have a bit of a dilemma and not sure what the right what should eb done next. Is this the right place to ask about bzr + launchpad? | 22:47 |
| wgrant | KI7MT: Sure | 22:48 |
| KI7MT | Ok .. kinda of a long story. | 22:48 |
| KI7MT | Last night I pushed an MP (merge proposal) to launchpad for ubuntu-doc, that got merged as was well .. except I'd made a blunder or two and had to fixe it, so I sent aother wiht the fixes. | 22:49 |
| KI7MT | After send the second one up, which is still awaiting merge, I fixed another bug | 22:50 |
| KI7MT | and I sent that up, after bzr commit --fixes lp:1234567 -m "Mindor text fix" | 22:51 |
| KI7MT | I then used bzr bundle > new-bug-fix.txt | 22:51 |
| KI7MT | And there's the problem, it pulled for whatever reason, parts of my second MP along wiht the minor bug fix, and I dont know whay or how to fix that. | 22:52 |
| wgrant | Hm, why were you using 'bzr bundle'? | 22:52 |
| wgrant | You don't need a bundle to use merge proposals. | 22:53 |
| KI7MT | wgrant, Normally, I would not, but that'w hat the ubuntu-docs directions said to do, as there's only like 6 folks that are commiters. | 22:53 |
| wgrant | I'd check the history on that wiki page; that instruction is probably more than 5 years old. | 22:54 |
| wgrant | ubuntu-docs just uses Launchpad merge proposals nowadays, AFAIK. | 22:54 |
| KI7MT | Here's the link, it's a short page: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DocumentationTeam/SystemDocumentation/Submitting | 22:55 |
| wgrant | "Another way it to make a merge proposal using Launchpad: " | 22:55 |
| wgrant | I'd use that method :) | 22:55 |
| KI7MT | wgrant, Yeah, Im not going to use the bundle again for sure. Quesiton , can I have more that one MP on LP for the same repo? | 22:56 |
| KI7MT | *more than one .. . | 22:56 |
| wgrant | KI7MT: You can only have one active MP between any one pair of branches. | 22:56 |
| wgrant | But that should be fine, since the old is merged now, right? | 22:57 |
| wgrant | So you can create a new MP, since the old one is no longer active. | 22:57 |
| KI7MT | Ok, so until they merge my second MP .. I can't send a second. What about working more fixes locally, how does that affect my local version> | 22:57 |
| KI7MT | sri my KB is seriously not workign well at all here, sri abt the typo's | 22:58 |
| wgrant | Hm, what are these new fixes? | 22:59 |
| wgrant | Are they fixes for problems that are blocking the previous merge proposal from being merged? | 22:59 |
| wgrant | Or are they unrelated fixes? | 23:00 |
| wgrant | In the latter case, you'd normally create a separate branch for them. | 23:00 |
| wgrant | And then propose that. | 23:00 |
| KI7MT | well, the first and second MP's were on the same set of files, the bug fix using bzr bundle, was totally unrelated. | 23:01 |
| wgrant | Right, totally unrelated usually means it should be a separate branch. | 23:01 |
| wgrant | No point conflating the two unrelated fixes. | 23:02 |
| KI7MT | wgrant, Well let me take that back then, the files I was working on / fixing were unrealted, but still part of the ubuntu-docs system docs. | 23:02 |
| wgrant | Sure | 23:03 |
| wgrant | But the changes aren't related, apart from being on the same project. | 23:03 |
| KI7MT | The bug fix was on Synaptic documentation, and the MP's were on the Online Accounts applicaiton. | 23:03 |
| wgrant | So it's simpler to review them separately. | 23:03 |
| wgrant | So it should be a separate MP, so a separate branch. | 23:03 |
| KI7MT | So you suggest, if I have a MP pending, pull the branch again, seperate location, and work fixes that way ? | 23:04 |
| wgrant | Right. Normally people have one branch per fix. | 23:04 |
| KI7MT | Oh, ok I didn't know that .. | 23:05 |
| KI7MT | Ok thank you that clears up the whole, and make it easy really. | 23:05 |
| wgrant | https://code.launchpad.net/~wgrant/launchpad/+branches?field.lifecycle=ALL for example | 23:05 |
| KI7MT | *whole deal | 23:05 |
| KI7MT | ok, so for each item,. module, widget, fix, you pull and use a seperate branch. | 23:06 |
| KI7MT | but then push that fix as an MP | 23:07 |
| KI7MT | SO one last question, you said I can only have one MP per papair, but I can have many pairs in my local repo ? | 23:09 |
| KI7MT | *per pair | 23:09 |
| KI7MT | wgrant, Thank you, I think I got it now. | 23:11 |
| TheLordOfTime | wgrant: to confirm: package-1.2.3-1~precise0.1 > package-1.2.3-1~precise0 in a PPA, right? | 23:13 |
| TheLordOfTime | i.e. the system won't yell at me for an older version? | 23:13 |
| TheLordOfTime | s/for/about/ | 23:13 |
| TheLordOfTime | ... nevermind, question answered on my own | 23:13 |
| * TheLordOfTime facedesks | 23:13 | |
| wgrant | TheLordOfTime: It is | 23:14 |
| wgrant | You can use dpkg --compare-versions to check | 23:14 |
| wgrant | $ dpkg --compare-versions 1.2.3-1~precise0.1 gt 1.2.3-1~precise0 && echo yes || echo no | 23:14 |
| wgrant | yes | 23:14 |
| TheLordOfTime | wgrant: yeah, i had already uploaded it but it was slow to complain is all | 23:14 |
| TheLordOfTime | s/complain/respond "accepted"/ | 23:14 |
| * TheLordOfTime blames cosmic rays | 23:14 | |
| TheLordOfTime | wgrant: similarly, 1.2.3-1 is greater than 1.2.3-1~precise0.1, right? I remember reading that ~something will basically say "this is before that actual version number" | 23:15 |
| TheLordOfTime | s/say/be interpreted as/ | 23:15 |
| wgrant | Right, '~' is less than '' | 23:15 |
| TheLordOfTime | wgrant: what's the underlying mechanism to determine that, by the way? | 23:20 |
| TheLordOfTime | probably not the best thing to be poking around about that, but i'm curious :P | 23:20 |
| wgrant | TheLordOfTime: I don't understand the question. | 23:20 |
| TheLordOfTime | wgrant: how does the system determine '~' is less than '', and 0.1 is greater than 0 and such? | 23:20 |
| * TheLordOfTime failed to word the question right at first, and apologizes | 23:21 | |
| wgrant | There is code in dpkg to implement the ordering defined by http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Version | 23:22 |
| TheLordOfTime | "The lexical comparison is a comparison of ASCII values modified so that all the letters sort earlier than all the non-letters and so that a tilde sorts before anything, even the end of a part." | 23:23 |
| TheLordOfTime | ahh that answers part of that. :) | 23:23 |
| TheLordOfTime | wgrant: thanks for the link. :) | 23:23 |
| wgrant | :) | 23:27 |
| TheLordOfTime | wgrant: in other news i fixed the FTBFS >.> i had to disable a module >.> | 23:44 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!