[05:50] <pitti> Good morning
[06:04] <tjaalton> Laney: hey, devede needs a merge & rebuild (transition to libpostproc52). the diff should probably be pushed to debian too?
[07:20] <cyphermox> good morning pitti, didrocks
[07:20] <pitti> bonjour cyphermox, ça va ?
[07:20] <cyphermox> pitti: bien sur, et toi?
[07:21] <didrocks> hey cyphermox! pitti :)
[07:21] <pitti> cyphermox: je vais bien aussi
[07:24] <cyphermox> super!
[07:25] <didrocks> cyphermox: thanks for the ofono* update ;)
[07:25] <didrocks> cyphermox: I copied your info in the general pending list, can you make (tomorrow) bfiller and others aware of no ofono-qt release?
[07:26] <cyphermox> yup
[07:27] <didrocks> thanks ;)
[07:32] <cyphermox> getting tired now :)
[07:35] <didrocks> getting late I guess, you should go to bed :)
[07:47] <sil2100> Good morning!
[07:49] <didrocks> hey sil2100, welcome back!
[07:49] <didrocks> how were your holidays?
[07:51] <sil2100> didrocks: hello! In overall good, although there were some minor problems here and there - but in overall I think I'm more or less rested :)
[07:51] <sil2100> didrocks: how were yours?
[07:51] <didrocks> sil2100: quite unexisting, just some good rest ;)
[07:52] <didrocks> unexciting*
[07:52] <didrocks> I'll let you backlog on some emails and will catch up with you after our meeting!
[07:52] <sil2100> Sure ;)
[09:07] <Laney> tjaalton: https://github.com/rastersoft/Devede/pull/22
[09:07] <Laney> do you want to work on the merge?
[09:07] <Laney> also, hi all happy friday!
[09:09] <tjaalton> Laney: ahh, cool
[09:10] <tjaalton> oh it went upstream, but not to debian yet
[09:10] <tjaalton> Laney: looks like grab-merge did mostly the right thing so it should be easy
[09:12] <Laney> cool
[09:12] <Laney> feel free to forward the diff to Debian if it looks like upstream won't take it
[09:12] <Laney> I'd probably change it to git format-patch patches so it's clear that they are now cherry-picks
[09:15] <seb128> good morning desktopers, happy friday!
[09:16] <Laney> hey seb128
[09:17] <Laney> first week of the year almost done!
[09:24] <seb128> oh yeah, first week, it feels like a while already ;-)
[09:25] <didrocks> hey seb128!
[09:25] <seb128> didrocks, lut, ça va ?
[09:25] <didrocks> happy Friday :)
[09:25] <didrocks> ça va :)
[09:25] <didrocks> et toi?
[09:25] <seb128> ça va bien ;-)
[09:26] <seb128> happy friday to you too !
[09:26] <didrocks> seb128: yesterday evening, I retried redeploying the juju magic and now I get: http://162.213.35.73
[09:27] <seb128> didrocks, so you got it hosted somewhere in the cloud?
[09:27] <didrocks> seb128: yeah, but on my account, not a common one
[09:28] <didrocks> seb128: however, there is this no rsync issue (as it's not the final IP I guess)
[09:28] <didrocks> seb128: can you just try to log in with your sso cred?
[09:28] <didrocks> you should be able to do nothing but I want to see if I can give you some rights
[09:28] <seb128> didrocks, works ;-)
[09:29] <didrocks> seb128: but you can't build, right?
[09:30] <seb128> didrocks, build what job? e.g prepare-silo ?
[09:30] <didrocks> seb128: whichever :)
[09:30] <seb128> didrocks, I tried to prepare-silo, got http://162.213.35.73/job/prepare-silo/4/console
[09:30] <didrocks> I guess you don't have access to "build"
[09:30] <didrocks> ah you do :)
[09:30] <seb128> yes, the button is there/working
[09:30] <didrocks> ok, so it seems there is no cred at all :p
[09:33] <seb128> Laney, what do you think about going on with bug #1265457 ?
[09:33] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1265457 in cogl (Ubuntu) "merge cogl 1.16 from debian " [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1265457
[09:34] <Laney> seb128: umm I don't have any objection in theory but I don't know about this case in particular
[09:35] <seb128> darkxst, hey, did you try rebuilding all cogl rdepends, do they build without error? can you handle the universe rebuild if we start that transition?
[09:39] <seb128> Laney, darkxst: I've commented on the bug asking some questions
[09:40] <Mirv> seb128: hi, I'd like to double check that properties-cpp (in NEW queue) was I think preNEWed by you? the Christmas just has made me forget, but I remember you had some small polishing suggestions (removing license statements from build files) and those were done.
[09:41] <seb128> Mirv, I've no idea, it's like a month old
[09:41] <darkxst> hi seb128
[09:41] <Mirv> seb128: ah, you approved it actually https://code.launchpad.net/~thomas-voss/properties-cpp/remove-license-statement-in-build-files/+merge/198927 :)
[09:41] <Mirv> so I think that was the story
[09:41] <darkxst> yes I rebuilt all rdepends, apart from ppa builders being spastic, there were no errors
[09:42] <seb128> Mirv, IRC logs seem to suggest I reviewed it
[09:42] <seb128> Mirv, right
[09:42] <Mirv> didrocks: IRC logs + that commit merge suggest seb128 reviewed it ^ :)
[09:43] <Mirv> damn Christmas holidays, we should just stop having any holidays
[09:44] <seb128> lol, speak for yourself ;-)
[09:46] <didrocks> great!
[09:46] <didrocks> clicking buttons :p
[09:47] <didrocks> Mirv: can you update the spreadsheet, please?
[09:47] <didrocks> oupsss, wrong button
[09:48]  * didrocks needs holidays
[09:48]  * didrocks refile a sync
[09:48] <seb128> lol
[09:48] <seb128> Laney, were is your ubuntu codesearch again? ;-)
[09:49] <Mirv> heh
[09:50] <pitti> seb128: http://ubuntu-codesearch.surgut.co.uk/ ?
[09:50] <pitti> Laney: ^ oh, is that your's? Many thanks!
[09:50] <seb128> pitti, thanks, last time I used it it didn't have a name but just an ip iirc
[09:51] <seb128> pitti, hey, how are you? happy friday!
[09:51] <pitti> seb128: and to you!
[09:52] <Laney> yeah, xnox set up dns for it
[09:53] <Laney> I ought to do the charm thing and set it up properly
[09:54] <Laney> sometimes updates randomly break everything
[09:54] <xnox> yeah, i got sick of not remembering the IP thus I've slapped my DNS on to it =)
[09:55] <xnox> Laney: i hope you did use a floating / static IP, such that i don't have to update my zones file too often =)
[09:55] <Laney> I don't know how to use any other kind of IP
[09:56] <xnox> =)
[10:01] <pitti> Laney: https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/trusty-adt-glib2.0/45/ARCH=i386,label=adt/consoleFull
[10:01] <pitti> /gdbus/bus-watch-name:
[10:01] <pitti> (/usr/lib/glib2.0/installed-tests/glib/gdbus-names:12401): GLib-GIO-CRITICAL **: Error while sending AddMatch() message: The connection is closed
[10:02] <pitti> Test glib/gdbus-names.test failed: Child process killed by signal 5
[10:02] <Laney> yeah
[10:02] <pitti> Laney: is that worth trying again?
[10:02] <Laney> it got dodgy lately
[10:02] <pitti> i. e. race condition or regression?
[10:02] <Laney> both
[10:02] <Laney> desrt was looking at it a bit yesterday
[10:02] <Laney> I'm actually filing a bug about it right now
[10:02] <Laney> because it started to make the package ftbfs too
[10:03] <pitti> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/2.39.2-0ubuntu2 built on the main arches, though
[10:03] <pitti> or was that only after 5 retries? :-)
[10:03] <xnox> Laney: i wonder if we should play with "packages" & codesearch a game similar to: http://regex.alf.nu/
[10:03] <Laney> i386/amd64 went in first time
[10:03] <Laney> the others got retried
[10:04] <darkxst> Laney or seb128, can you take a look at the gnome-themes-standard update in queue, this is needed to fix lots of theming issues under gnome-shell/gtk3.10
[10:04]  * pitti retries the autopkgtest then
[10:04] <Laney> pitti: check the history of the job
[10:05] <Laney> it was solid for a long time, then got flaky lately
[10:05] <Laney> I think with 2.39.2
[10:05] <Laney> but it could be something external that changed, of course
[10:06] <Laney> xnox: :D
[10:09] <seb128> darkxst, Laney: I'm looking at nautilus 3.10 first, I can try having a look to the theme later
[10:09] <seb128> darkxst, how come you don't have access to upload that one? (in what upload set are you btw?)
[10:10] <Laney> none!
[10:10] <seb128> not even MOTU?
[10:10] <seb128> you should apply for that ;-)
[10:23] <seb128> darkxst, the new nautilus' toolbar looks buggy
[10:26] <seb128> darkxst, http://ubuntuone.com/5CDyRasgb2yp3Ak9tRGNaX
[10:26] <seb128> the buttons are too small
[10:30] <seb128> larsu, I saw you landed your gedit fix for the sidepane color issue, should I try to backport the git commits?
[10:33] <darkxst> seb128, hmm, I tested it in Ambiance and it seemed identical to 3.8
[10:33] <seb128> darkxst, do you see the issue on my screenshot?
[10:34] <darkxst> no, I don't normally use ubuntu themes
[10:34] <seb128> darkxst, http://ubuntuone.com/5LF35MrCmwJbMOphrQz9qJ
[10:34] <seb128> that's with 3.8
[10:34] <seb128> see how the <> button have the same height than the breadcumb bar
[10:35] <seb128> e.g all the icons have the same height
[10:35] <seb128> in 3.10 the icons are smaller than the location bar
[10:35] <darkxst> yeh I see
[10:36] <darkxst> will look into it over the weekend
[10:36] <seb128> thanks
[10:36] <seb128> I'm going to run 3.10 over the w.e to see if I spot other issues
[10:38] <darkxst> ok
[11:04] <seb128> darkxst, other issue, the corners between the toolbar and the wm bar have some white pixels, seems it could be due to the "round corner" for the CSD?
[11:04] <seb128> http://ubuntuone.com/1QwHezAjewqTsD7QSfQjQN
[11:16] <darkxst> seb128, right that is probably a theme issue
[11:18] <darkxst> seb128, btw, I spoke with robert about bug 1228765
[11:18] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1228765 in Ubuntu GNOME "Need to implement DisplayConfig dbus interface within Unity" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1228765
[11:18] <darkxst> I have ripped out the display config code and seems best to put it in a new package as a stand-alone dbus service
[11:19] <darkxst> seem reasonable?
[11:21] <larsu> seb128: hey, I just got up because I worked long last night (and didn't have breakfast yet)
[11:21] <larsu> seb128: I couldn't find the right gedit branch
[11:21] <larsu> lp:ubuntu/gedit seems outdated
[11:22] <larsu> beackporting would be great. The gedit patch should be enough
[11:22] <larsu> *backporting
[11:23] <seb128> darkxst, that would work for me yes
[11:23] <seb128> larsu, good morning, happy friday!
[11:23] <seb128> larsu, I tried backported it, it fixes the color issue but then the combo is not vertically centered anymore?
[11:23] <seb128> larsu, there is like 2px padding on top and 0 on bottom
[11:24] <seb128> larsu, vcs is lp:~ubuntu-desktop/gedit/ubuntu, but don't worry I did the gedit backport ... is the padding one a theme thing? (I saw you patched adwaita upstream as well)
[11:24] <larsu> seb128: ah I didn't notice that. Mayve my Ambiance is to hacked up by now :)
[11:24] <larsu> I'll fix it after some breakfast
[11:25] <larsu> seb128: thanks for testing it!
[11:25] <seb128> larsu, http://ubuntuone.com/7SvYg2qNu4Q9LViJnTsm5h
[11:26] <larsu> seb128: they did quite a few changes on the adwaita gedit parts recently
[11:26] <seb128> larsu, https://bug721813.bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=265731 ... you have "border-bottom: 1px solid @borders;"
[11:26] <seb128> larsu, but solid looks weird, it makes a dark line at the bottom
[11:26] <larsu> I don't know if we want the border as well
[11:26] <seb128> larsu, anyway, no hurry, enjoy your tea first ;-)
[11:26] <larsu> they asked me to do that for adwaita
[11:26] <larsu> thanks :)
[11:56] <desrt> Laney: i think i'm probably going to disable the test....
[11:58] <Laney> desrt: as you wish
[12:00] <Laney> I wonder why it became so much more unreliable
[12:06] <desrt> race fairy
[12:07] <Laney> sun spots
[12:07]  * Laney builds a version with it disabled
[12:12] <Laney> of course, the latest ppc64el version finally built :-)
[12:13] <Laney> maybe you could get that into .3 then
[12:29] <Laney> dobey: looks like u1trial has borked
[12:29] <Laney> new twisted?
[12:40] <Laney> see: http://d-jenkins.ubuntu-ci:8080/view/Trusty/view/AutoPkgTest/job/trusty-adt-rhythmbox-ubuntuone/14/ARCH=amd64,label=adt/console
[12:56] <sil2100> seb128: hello! Happy new year!
[12:56] <seb128> sil2100, hey, happy new year! how are you?
[12:57] <sil2100> seb128: fine fine, I cought a cold in the last week of my holidays, but thankfully it wore off more or less now
[12:57] <sil2100> seb128: how about you?
[12:57] <sil2100> *caught
[12:58] <seb128> I'm good thanks
[12:58] <sil2100> seb128: could I kindly ask of you to make a preNEW review of a semi new package that we want to daily-release, once you have a free moment
[12:58] <sil2100> seb128: it's lp:mediascanner2
[12:59] <seb128> sil2100, not likely today, I've a ton of stuff still in my backlog
[12:59] <seb128> could didrocks maybe do this one?
[12:59] <seb128> if he doesn't please ping me again next week
[12:59] <sil2100> seb128: ok, I'll poke him or someone else from the required teams
[12:59] <seb128> thanks
[13:00] <seb128> sorry about that, but I've several import reviews to do which are already blocking others and I didn't get to them yet
[13:00] <sil2100> No problem :)
[13:02] <didrocks> seb128: I'll probably do it
[13:03] <seb128> didrocks, thanks
[13:31] <Laney> dobey: http://paste.ubuntu.com/6726582/ gets around it but I don't know if that's ideal
[13:31] <Laney> in particular I'm not sure what the extra value is for
[13:35] <dobey> Laney: apparently new twisted regressed and wasn't held in proposed when autopkgtests failed :-/
[13:36] <dobey> haven't had time to actually look into the issue though
[13:39] <Laney> dobey: Indeed
[13:40] <Laney> jibel: how come twisted wasn't held back? It made ubuntuone-dev-tools fail
[13:42] <Laney> I: [Wed Jan  8 00:34:51 2014] - Collected autopkgtest status for ubuntuone-dev-tools_13.10-0ubuntu1: PASS
[13:43] <Laney> mmm, it's never seen the FAIL AFAICT
[13:43] <jibel> Laney, and in the result history there is: ubuntuone-dev-tools 13.10-0ubuntu1 FAIL twisted 13.2.0-1ubuntu1 ubuntuone-dev-tools 13.10-0ubuntu1
[13:44] <Laney> I was looking in the britney logs
[13:44] <Laney> you think it's bad on that side?
[13:46] <Laney> jibel: going to lunch now, could you take it up with cjwatson if so?
[13:46] <Laney> biab
[13:47] <jibel> Laney, I'd wait before blaming any side
[13:47] <jibel> checking where it got this pass from
[14:29] <pitti> about 7 ubuntuone packages failed on that, and some definitively have direct depends on twistd stuff
[14:31] <Laney> pitti: yeah, ubuntuone-dev-tools does
[14:32] <larsu> seb128: so ... I'm not sure how far we want to copy Adwaita. Would you like the large titles as well? (where it says "Navigatuer de fichiers")?
[14:32] <seb128> larsu, do I look like a designer ? ;-)
[14:32] <larsu> seb128: I can't see you from here :P
[14:32] <larsu> I have the same problem though
[14:32] <larsu> hm, imgur not working
[14:33] <seb128> larsu, I would just copy stuff that don't look out of place
[14:33] <seb128> that's sort of the look the gedit guys designed
[14:33] <larsu> seb128: http://i.imgur.com/eoHAUp9.png ?
[14:33] <larsu> I'm not sure about no border on the bottom
[14:33] <seb128> with a dark line it looks weird
[14:33] <larsu> because white and @theme_bg_color are so similar
[14:34] <larsu> dark line?
[14:34] <larsu> oh, you mean at the top?
[14:34] <seb128> well, I copied the border snippet from your adwaita commit this morning
[14:34] <seb128> and that was adding a black line at the bottom
[14:34] <larsu> ah, bottom then
[14:34] <larsu> are you fine with the screenshot?
[14:34] <seb128> yes
[14:34] <seb128> but as said I'm not a designer
[14:34] <larsu> okay. Me too. Not a designer.
[14:34] <seb128> I just dislike stuff that not centered/aligned
[14:35] <larsu> I agree
[14:35] <seb128> which is why I commented about the combo position
[14:35] <larsu> good catch :)
[14:35]  * larsu readies a MR
[14:35] <larsu> will you apply the gedit fix or point me to the branch I can MR it on?
[14:37] <seb128> larsu, I've it ready, but I get those warnings now
[14:37] <seb128> (gedit:2230): Gtk-WARNING **: Unknown property: GtkToolItem.margin-end
[14:38] <larsu> seb128: might be that those got added > 3.10, let me check
[14:39] <seb128> larsu, https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/commit/?id=9921bec63a3e67e2c2e38ca734590909a9f734b5
[14:39] <larsu> ya, they did
[14:39] <seb128> right
[14:40] <larsu> so s/-end/-right/ for us. I'll send you a patch
[14:40] <seb128> larsu, no need
[14:40] <larsu> k
[14:40] <seb128> larsu, I'm doing a test build
[14:41] <seb128> larsu, do you feel like doing more gedit&look debugging? :p
[14:41] <larsu> sure
[14:42] <larsu> have you seen the new gedit?
[14:42] <larsu> gnome3ified
[14:42] <seb128> I saw screenshots, I told them I would try it to comment on how well it works under Unity, still on my todo for today
[14:43] <larsu> it doesn't work well ...
[14:43] <seb128> I was expecting that...
[14:43] <larsu> it looks shitty in Ambiance and you can't resize it
[14:43] <larsu> it's pretty awesome in adwaita though
[14:43] <larsu> but then ... this is what they're designing for
[14:43] <seb128> yeah, we discussed that on #gtk+ for an hour the other day
[14:43] <seb128> on how new GNOME app style works great for GNOME
[14:44] <seb128> but sucks out of it
[14:44] <seb128> the gedit guys are nice, they actually care about their users on other desktops
[14:46] <larsu> yep, they're awesome
[14:46] <seb128> larsu, well, anyway issues with gedit and with theming i've still on my list (just mentioned them, thinking about it I should probably bother the upstream guys)
[14:46] <larsu> feel free to bother me first :)
[14:46] <seb128> 1- if you right click in the textview in gedit, the font in the menu is monospace (same as the textview)
[14:46] <seb128> which is weird
[14:47] <seb128> I guess that's an upstream gedit/gtk issue though
[14:47] <seb128> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+bug/1242984
[14:47] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1242984 in gedit (Ubuntu) " Gedit context menu font is monospace" [Low,Incomplete]
[14:48] <seb128> 2- not gedit, but with the light theme, the checkmark/dots in the new dropdown menus are white on grey which is not visible
[14:48] <seb128> (that's a bug in the theme I guess)
[14:48] <seb128> dropdown menu, being e.g in evince or nautilus
[14:49] <seb128> 3- the baobab o-s issue
[14:50] <seb128> larsu, oh, found https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697127 ... https://bug697127.bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=252130 ... we should do the same I guess
[14:50] <ubot2> Gnome bug 697127 in general "gedit context menu uses fixed-width font" [Normal,Resolved: fixed]
[14:50] <seb128> larsu, if you mp the border tweaks can you include that?
[14:52] <seb128>  
[14:52] <seb128> ok, I'm going for some exercice, it's a bit sunny so let's go before it's night
[14:52] <seb128> back in ~1h
[14:53] <larsu> seb128: have fun!
[14:53] <larsu> I'll have a look at those issues
[14:53] <seb128> larsu, thanks, and thanks! ;-)
[14:59] <seb128> larsu, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/3.10.3-0ubuntu2
[14:59] <seb128> ok, that done, I'm out for an hour, bbl
[15:21] <chrisccoulson> who looks after mesa these days?
[15:23] <Laney> mlankhorst does
[15:39] <chrisccoulson> Laney, yeah, i've just subscribed him to my bug already. thanks :)
[15:39] <chrisccoulson> mlankhorst, bug 1267893 might be of interest to you ;)
[15:39] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1267893 in Oxide "Shutdown crash due to possible mesa race at startup" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1267893
[15:39] <Laney> (H)
[15:49] <mlankhorst> chrisccoulson: feel free to assign :P afk
[15:49] <chrisccoulson> mlankhorst, to you? :)
[15:49] <mlankhorst> yeah
[15:50] <chrisccoulson> mlankhorst, shall i move it to mesa too?
[16:04] <Sarvatt> chrisccoulson, mlankhorst: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/17161/ ?
[16:06] <chrisccoulson> Sarvatt, yes, that would prevent the crash. although, it feels like a bit of a band aid (glx is still registered twice on the display handle)
[16:07] <Laney> okay, I'm taking off a little early today after having short lunches/working later, see you guys next week!
[16:14] <larsu> Laney: have a nice weekend!
[16:16] <larsu> seb128: which dropdown do you mean? (your point 2 from before)
[16:20] <seb128> Laney, have a nice w.e !
[16:21] <seb128> larsu, e.g in nautilus the \/ menu
[16:21] <seb128> next to the icons for icon/list views
[16:23] <seb128> larsu, http://ubuntuone.com/4zwDVC3qOLj2qIaQfka7Ox
[16:23] <larsu> ah, those!
[16:23] <larsu> thanks
[16:23] <seb128> larsu, see the checkmark on the left of the "show sidepane f9" for example
[16:23] <larsu> how was your excersice?
[16:23] <seb128> very good, thanks!
[16:24] <seb128> it's a bit colder than yesterday, but 8°C is still warm for january
[16:24] <larsu> ya
[16:24] <larsu> same her
[16:24] <larsu> *here
[16:28] <larsu> doesn't seem to be a theme issue, but rather it's always drawn white
[16:28] <larsu> hm, not in adwaita
[17:21] <larsu> seb128: https://code.launchpad.net/~larsu/ubuntu-themes/radiance-dark-checks/+merge/201235
[17:21] <seb128> larsu, danke!
[17:22] <larsu> that diff doesn't look like the chnages that I did... weird
[17:22] <larsu> but they are correct (I think)
[17:23] <larsu> actually, the insensitive ones might still be incorrect
[17:24] <larsu> ah no they're fine. They always use the same png
[17:25] <sil2100> didrocks: today I also cleaned up some stuff related to appmenu-qt5, like creating the LP project, fixing packaging and finalizing the Qt5 patches
[17:25] <didrocks> sil2100: ah, excellent news!
[17:25] <didrocks> so next week, appmenu-qt5 in?
[17:25] <didrocks> :)
[17:25] <sil2100> didrocks: both required Qt5 changes are approved upstream, Timo already cherry-picked them to our 5.2 ;)
[17:25] <didrocks> ah, so only with 5.2
[17:26] <sil2100> I hope so! It's all ready and my TODO includes daily-releasing appmenu-qt5
[17:26] <sil2100> didrocks: we could back-port the patches to the old Qt5 if needed, no problem
[17:26] <didrocks> sil2100: let's see the timeline :)
[17:27] <sil2100> didrocks: just for now, since we're looking 'everything 5.2' we concentrated on that one, but I also tested the same changes on 5.0.2
[17:28] <didrocks> sounds legit, no worry!
[18:03]  * didrocks waves good evening and good week-end