[00:00] basically if you participate constructively in those channels then you might well end up as an operator [00:00] but there is no particular benefit to being an operator, it just means you share some of the workload in keeping the channel on topic, friendly and troll free [00:01] I am off for the night now, but do feel free to expand on the background to this request, I think there are some other operators who speak spanish and are in the -es channels who may be able to discuss further [00:01] We have the same requirements. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IRC/ES/RequerimientosOperador [00:23] I believe that loco teams have the right to manage their channels the way they see fit, provided they follow the Ubuntu Code of Conduct. They can set whatever requirements they wish to becoming an op. [00:24] Alos, " since m4v is a lamer..." is not how an Ubuntu member should be referring to a fellow user/member. [00:25] Aaron: I suggest you read the Code of Conduct again. [00:25] !coc [00:25] The Ubuntu Code of Conduct is the document that spells out etiquette in the Ubuntu community | http://www.ubuntu.com/project/about-ubuntu/conduct | For information on how to electronically sign the CoC, see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/SigningCodeofConduct | Watch http://static.screencasts.ubuntu.com/videos/2010/12/22/004-SigningCoC.ogv [01:06] lol sorry for my behavior but it had to be said... [01:06] i been in IRC for ages. [01:12] Aaron: It's not about time in IRC but, it's about your conduct to become an OP [01:54] In this situation the IRCC won't and can't dictate to a loco channel who they should make an op. I think m4v is a very capable of making this choice and I will abide by whatever he feels is best. [02:04] IdleOne: but... i'm not ircc, so i can op him, rite? [02:05] you could if you have the proper access in the channel I suppose, but -es has a process in place so i would advise against not following the process [02:06] IdleOne: ah you're right, i've been known to never op people against a process, so i'm not going to start now [02:06] Good plan :) [04:42] hmmm [04:42] that's odd [04:56] what is ? [05:40] IdleOne: by the way, #ubuntu-es is not a loco channel, but the loco council would like to have a talk about that topic soon :) [05:41] jose: you mean not an "approved loco channel" or whatever it is they are called now? [05:42] IdleOne: nope, #ubuntu-es is the general support channel in Spanish, #ubuntu-es-es is for the spanish loco [05:42] the loco council thinks that #ubuntu-es should be for the loco, but that'd need some changes and thoughts about where the support channel can go [05:44] Who is the current leader of that team/loco? [05:44] GatoLoko on IRC [05:48] well the status of the channel as far as the loco council is concerned is a separate issue. I still believe that as far as #ubuntu-es is concerned m4v and fellow channel ops are best placed to decide who can and can't be an op in that channel. [05:49] yeppers, +1 [06:16] it sucks, because none of the ops, are active. [06:16] only trolls [06:17] but it's all Good! [07:04] trolls ftw ;) [19:21] just advertised in -uk http://www.ebay.co.uk/usr/linuxiow with a comment that wrong channel